Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Stem Cells. Dec 26, 2020; 12(12): 1591-1602
Published online Dec 26, 2020. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v12.i12.1591
Figure 1
Figure 1 Surgical marking to identify lower thoracic and upper lumbar spine.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Surgical images. A and B: Surgical image of the spinal cord; C and D: The spinal cord before removal.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Control group showing extensive vacuolization. A: H&E × 200; B: H&E × 400. Highlighted by a single arrow.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Control group showing minimum gliosis. A: H&E × 200; B: H&E × 400. Highlighted by a single arrow.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Spinal cord injury treated with rat embryonic stem cells showing vacuolization at the peripheral area of a longitudinal section of the spinal cord. A: H&E × 200; B: H&E × 400.
Figure 6
Figure 6 Section (× 400 HPF) shows reactive gliosis in rat embryonic stem cells-treated spinal cord injury.
Figure 7
Figure 7 Spinal cord injury treated with autologous bone marrow-derived neurocytes showing limited vacuolization. A: H&E × 200; B: H&E × 400.
Figure 8
Figure 8 Autologous bone marrow-derived neurocytes-treated spinal cord injury showing prominent gliosis. A: H&E × 200; B: H&E × 400.
Figure 9
Figure 9 Comparison of glial fibrillary acidic protein staining. A: Rat embryonic stem cells; B: Autologous bone marrow-derived neurocytes.