Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Stem Cells. Apr 26, 2014; 6(2): 94-110
Published online Apr 26, 2014. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v6.i2.94
“Ins” and “Outs” of mesenchymal stem cell osteogenesis in regenerative medicine
Dean T Yamaguchi
Dean T Yamaguchi, Research Service, Veteran Administration Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System and David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90073, United States
Author contributions: Yamaguchi DT solely contributed to this review.
Supported by Veterans Administration Merit Review Award 2 I01 BX000170-05
Correspondence to: Dean T Yamaguchi, MD, PhD, Research Service, Veteran Administration Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System and David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California at Los Angeles, 11301 Wilshire Blvd, Bldg 114, Rm 330, Los Angeles, CA 90073, United States. dean.yamaguchi@va.gov
Telephone: +1-310-2683459 Fax: +1-310-2684856
Received: October 20, 2013
Revised: January 15, 2014
Accepted: January 17, 2014
Published online: April 26, 2014
Processing time: 190 Days and 11.9 Hours
Abstract

Repair and regeneration of bone requires mesenchymal stem cells that by self-renewal, are able to generate a critical mass of cells with the ability to differentiate into osteoblasts that can produce bone protein matrix (osteoid) and enable its mineralization. The number of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) diminishes with age and ex vivo replication of hMSCs has limited potential. While propagating hMSCs under hypoxic conditions may maintain their ability to self-renew, the strategy of using human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) to allow for hMSCs to prolong their replicative lifespan is an attractive means of ensuring a critical mass of cells with the potential to differentiate into various mesodermal structural tissues including bone. However, this strategy must be tempered by the oncogenic potential of TERT-transformed cells, or their ability to enhance already established cancers, the unknown differentiating potential of high population doubling hMSCs and the source of hMSCs (e.g., bone marrow, adipose-derived, muscle-derived, umbilical cord blood, etc.) that may provide peculiarities to self-renewal, differentiation, and physiologic function that may differ from non-transformed native cells. Tissue engineering approaches to use hMSCs to repair bone defects utilize the growth of hMSCs on three-dimensional scaffolds that can either be a base on which hMSCs can attach and grow or as a means of sequestering growth factors to assist in the chemoattraction and differentiation of native hMSCs. The use of whole native extracellular matrix (ECM) produced by hMSCs, rather than individual ECM components, appear to be advantageous in not only being utilized as a three-dimensional attachment base but also in appropriate orientation of cells and their differentiation through the growth factors that native ECM harbor or in simulating growth factor motifs. The origin of native ECM, whether from hMSCs from young or old individuals is a critical factor in “rejuvenating” hMSCs from older individuals grown on ECM from younger individuals.

Keywords: Mesenchymal stem cell; Telomerase reverse transcriptase; Extracellular matrix; Osteogenesis; Regenerative medicine; Tissue engineering; Proliferation; Differentiation

Core tip: When human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) transformed human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) are used to prolong replicative potential and osteogenic differentiation, consideration should be given to using lower population doubling hTERT-transformed hMSCs to avoid potential oncogenesis. An inducible hTERT system may also avoid oncogenic transformation. Demonstration of in vivo bone forming capacity of hTERT-transformed cells should be used as standard in determining osteogenic differentiation of such cells rather than in vitro culture mineralization; the CD146 marker may be a suggested surface marker for hTERT-transformed hMSCs that may have the capacity to form bone in vivo. Native ECM from early population doubling hMSCs or hMSCs from a younger source may be best when seeking to extend the proliferative and differentiating potential of hMSCs from either young or older sources.