Copyright
©The Author(s) 1998.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 15, 1998; 4(2): 140-143
Published online Apr 15, 1998. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v4.i2.140
Published online Apr 15, 1998. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v4.i2.140
Table 1 Experimental groups and preservation time
Groups | Preservation time | ||
10 h | 18 h | 24 h | |
LR | 5 | 5 | 6 |
EC | 5 | 7 | 6 |
HC-A | 6 | 5 | 5 |
WMO-1 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
Table 2 Recipient survival rate on the 21st POD (%)
Groups | Preservation time | ||
10 h | 18 h | 24 h | |
LR | 100 | 60 | 0a |
EC | 100 | 100 | 60 |
HC-A | 100 | 80 | 20 |
WMO-1 | 100 | 100 | 60 |
Table 3 Mucosal Na+-K+ ATPase activity after 30 min of reperfusion (μmol Pi/mg protein·h, x-± s)
- Citation: Li YS, Li JS, Li N, Jiang ZW, Zhao YZ, Li NY, Liu FN. Evaluation of various solutions for small bowel graft preservation. World J Gastroenterol 1998; 4(2): 140-143
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v4/i2/140.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v4.i2.140