Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 7, 2022; 28(25): 2920-2936
Published online Jul 7, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i25.2920
Published online Jul 7, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i25.2920
Table 1 The reaction system
Position | Reagent |
Wells 1 and 7 | Proteinase K: 20 μL |
Lysate: 200 μL | |
Wells 2 and 8 | Buffer KCL: 750 μL |
Wells 3 and 9 | Buffer GW1: 750 μL |
Wells 4 and 10 | Buffer GW2: 750 μL |
Wells 5 and 11 | Buffer MW3: 750 μL |
Wells 6 and 12 | Buffer GE: 100 μL |
Table 2 Clinical data analysis of colorectal cancer patients
Clinical feature | Stratification | Number of people (%) |
Age (years old) | ≥ 60 | 30 (60.00) |
< 60 | 20 (40.00) | |
Sex | Male | 26 (52.00) |
Female | 24 (48.00) | |
Tumor location | Sigmoid colon + left hemicolon | 11 (22.00) |
Right hemicolon | 10 (20.00) | |
Rectum | 29 (58.00) | |
Tumor size (cm) | ≥ 6 | 12 (24.00) |
< 6 | 38 (76.00) | |
Degree of tumor differentiation | High + medium high | 12 (24.00) |
Moderately | 25 (50.00) | |
Low medium + low | 12 (24.00) | |
TNM classification | I + II | 33 (66.00) |
III + IV | 17 (34.00) |
Table 3 Summary of gene mutations in colorectal cancer patients
Gene | Tumor tissue | Preoperative feces | Postoperative stools | |||
Total number of mutations | Mutation frequency | Total number of mutations | Mutation frequency | Total number of mutations | Mutation frequency | |
TP53 | 40 | 62.00% (31/50) | 27 | 59.26% (16/27) | 7 | 31.58% (6/19) |
APC | 15 | 24.00% (12/50) | 3 | 11.11% (3/27) | 0 | 0 |
KRAS | 30 | 58.00% (29/50) | 11 | 37.04% (10/27) | 0 | 0 |
PIK3CA | 13 | 22.00% (11/50) | 1 | 3.70% (1/27) | 2 | 10.53% (2/19) |
FBXW7 | 5 | 10.00% (5/50) | 1 | 3.70% (1/27) | 0 | 0 |
GNAS | 2 | 4.00% (2/50) | 1 | 3.70% (1/27) | 0 | 0 |
PTEN | 11 | 22.00% (11/50) | 1 | 3.70% (1/27) | 0 | 0 |
ABL1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3.70% (1/27) | 0 | 0 |
PDGFRA | 12 | 24.00% (12/50) | 8 | 29.63% (8/27) | 6 | 31.58% (6/19) |
ATM | 1 | 2.00% (1/50) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
SMAD4 | 1 | 2.00% (1/50) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BRAF | 2 | 4.00% (2/50) | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10.53% (2/19) |
PTPN11 | 1 | 2.00% (1/50) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
NRAS | 1 | 2.00% (1/50) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
CTNNB1 | 3 | 6.00% (3/50) | 1 | 3.70% (1/27) | 0 | 0 |
STK11 | 2 | 4.00% (2/50) | 1 | 3.70% (1/27) | 0 | 0 |
AKT1 | 1 | 2.00% (1/50) | 1 | 3.70% (1/27) | 0 | 0 |
CDKN2A | 3 | 6.00% (3/50) | 4 | 7.41% (2/27) | 3 | 5.26% (1/19) |
HRAS | 21 | 42.00% (21/50) | 12 | 40.74% (11/27) | 8 | 42.11% (8/19) |
EGFR | 2 | 4.00% (2/50) | 2 | 7.41% (2/27) | 1 | 5.26% (1/19) |
IDH1 | 2 | 4.00% (2/50) | 2 | 7.41% (2/27) | 1 | 5.26% (1/19) |
NOTCH1 | 2 | 4.00% (2/50) | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5.26% (1/19) |
VHL | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3.70% (1/27) | 0 | 0 |
KIT | 7 | 14.00% (7/50) | 2 | 7.41% (2/27) | 4 | 21.05% (4/19) |
MET | 9 | 18.00% (9/50) | 5 | 18.52% (5/27) | 4 | 21.05% (4/19) |
MLH1 | 3 | 6.00% (3/50) | 2 | 7.41% (2/27) | 2 | 10.53% (2/19) |
MPL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5.26% (1/19) |
Table 4 Fecal gene mutation results in the control groups
Group | Genes | Location | Amino acid mutation | Mutation frequency |
Normal control | PDGFRA | Exon 19 | V824V | 2 |
KIT | Exon 10 | K546K | 1 | |
HRAS | Exon 2 | H27H | 1 | |
Intestinal benign disease | PDGFRA | Exon 19 | V824V | 3 |
HRAS | Exon 2 | H27H | 1 | |
KIT | Exon 10 | M541L | 1 | |
STK11 | Exon 8 | F354L | 1 |
Table 5 Comparison of pathogenic mutation sites in preoperative stools vs tumor tissues
Gene | Positive rate of pathogenic gene mutation sites | |
Preoperative feces | Tumor tissues | |
TP53 | 37.04% (10/27) | 46.00% (23/50) |
APC | 11.11% (3/27) | 18.00% (9/50) |
KRAS | 25.93% (7/27) | 54.00% (27/50) |
PIK3CA | 3.70% (1/27) | 22.00% (11/50) |
FBXW7 | 3.70% (1/27) | 6.00% (3/50) |
GNAS | 3.70% (1/27) | 4.00% (2/50) |
PTEN | 3.70% (1/27) | 0 |
ABL1 | 3.70% (1/27) | 0 |
PDGFRA | 3.70% (1/27) | 0 |
ATM | 0 | 2.00% (1/50) |
SMAD4 | 0 | 2.00% (1/50) |
BRAF | 0 | 2.00% (1/50) |
PTPN11 | 0 | 2.00% (1/50) |
NRAS | 0 | 2.00% (1/50) |
CTNNB1 | 0 | 2.00% (1/50) |
VHL | 3.70% (1/27) | 0 |
Table 6 Comparison of pathogenic mutation sites in preoperative stools vs normal control stools
Gene | Positive rate of pathogenic gene mutation sites | χ2 | P value | |
Preoperative feces | Normal control group | |||
TP53 | 37.04% (10/27) | 0 | 7.328 | 0.007 |
APC | 11.11% (3/27) | 0 | 0.878 | 0.349 |
KRAS | 25.93% (7/27) | 0 | 4.219 | 0.040 |
PIK3CA | 3.70% (1/27) | 0 | Fisher exact test | 1 |
FBXW7 | 3.70% (1/27) | 0 | Fisher exact test | 1 |
GNAS | 3.70% (1/27) | 0 | Fisher exact test | 1 |
PTEN | 3.70% (1/27) | 0 | Fisher exact test | 1 |
ABL1 | 3.70% (1/27) | 0 | Fisher exact test | 1 |
PDGFRA | 3.70% (1/27) | 0 | Fisher exact test | 1 |
Table 7 Comparison of pathogenic mutation sites in preoperative stools vs benign control group
Gene | Positive rate of pathogenic gene mutation sites | χ2 | P value | |
Preoperative feces | Benign control group | |||
TP53 | 37.04% (10/27) | 0 | 7.328 | 0.007 |
APC | 11.11% (3/27) | 0 | 0.878 | 0.349 |
KRAS | 25.93% (7/27) | 0 | 4.219 | 0.040 |
PIK3CA | 3.70% (1/27) | 0 | Fisher exact test | 1 |
FBXW7 | 3.70% (1/27) | 0 | Fisher exact test | 1 |
GNAS | 3.70% (1/27) | 0 | Fisher exact test | 1 |
PTEN | 3.70% (1/27) | 0 | Fisher exact test | 1 |
ABL1 | 3.70% (1/27) | 0 | Fisher exact test | 1 |
PDGFRA | 3.70% (1/27) | 0 | Fisher exact test | 1 |
Table 8 Comparison of pathogenic mutation sites in preoperative stools vs postoperative stools
Gene | Positive rate of pathogenic gene mutation sites | χ2 | P value | |
Preoperative feces | Postoperative stools | |||
TP53 | 37.04% (10/27) | 0 | 6.947 | 0.008 |
APC | 11.11% (3/27) | 0 | 0.804 | 0.370 |
KRAS | 25.93% (7/27) | 0 | 3.974 | 0.046 |
PIK3CA | 3.70% (1/27) | 5.26% (1/19) | Fisher exact test | 1 |
FBXW7 | 3.70% (1/27) | 0 | Fisher exact test | 1 |
GNAS | 3.70% (1/27) | 0 | Fisher exact test | 1 |
PTEN | 3.70% (1/27) | 0 | Fisher exact test | 1 |
ABL1 | 3.70% (1/27) | 0 | Fisher exact test | 1 |
PDGFRA | 3.70% (1/27) | 0 | Fisher exact test | 1 |
BRAF | 0 | 5.26% (1/19) | Fisher exact test | 1 |
MPL | 0 | 5.26% (1/19) | Fisher exact test | 1 |
Table 9 Analysis of pathogenic mutation sites in tumor tissues
Table 10 Analysis of pathogenic mutation sites in preoperative feces
Table 11 Colorectal cancer diagnosis results by TP53 and KRAS mutations in preoperative stools, n (%)
Gene | TP | FP | FN | TN | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV |
TP53 | 16 | 0 | 11 | 20 | 59.26 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 64.52 |
KRAS | 10 | 0 | 17 | 20 | 37.04 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 54.05 |
TP53 or KRAS | 18 | 0 | 9 | 20 | 66.67 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 68.97 |
Table 12 "Undetected" gene mutation sites in tumor tissues
Gene | Location | Amino acid mutation | Mutation start position | Mutation end position | Number of cases | Undetected sites/total mutation sites |
TP53 | Exon 4 | A84G | 7579436 | 7579436 | 4 | |
Exon 5 | P152A | 7578476 | 7578476 | 1 | ||
Exon 8 | L289P | 7577072 | 7577072 | 1 | 6/40 | |
APC | Exon 17 | S13461 | 112175328 | 112175328 | 1 | |
K1573fs | 112175953 | 112175954 | 1 | |||
E1327fs | 112175213 | 112175217 | 1 | 3/15 | ||
FBXW7 | Exon 7 | R2781 | 153258983 | 153258983 | 1 | |
Exon 12 | R266C | 153247289 | 153247289 | 1 | 2/5 | |
NOTCH1 | Exon 26 | R1599P | 139399350 | 139399350 | 2 | 2/2 |
EGFR | Exon 20 | I821T | 55249164 | 55249164 | 1 | 1/2 |
Table 13 "Undetected" gene mutation sites in preoperative feces
Gene | Location | Amino acid mutation | Mutation start position | Mutation end position | Number of cases | Undetected sites/total mutation sites |
TP53 | Exon 4 | A84G | 7579436 | 7579436 | 1 | |
Exon 5 | S166P | 7578434 | 7578434 | 1 | ||
Exon 7 | N247D | 7577542 | 7577542 | 3 | ||
Exon 8 | L289P | 7577072 | 7577072 | 1 | 6/27 | |
CDKN2A | Exon 2 | V51A | 21971206 | 21971206 | 2 | |
L63P | 21971170 | 21971170 | 1 | 3/4 | ||
HRAS | Exon 2 | G12R | 534289 | 534289 | 1 | 1/10 |
EGFR | Exon 20 | I821T | 55249164 | 55249164 | 1 | 1/2 |
IDH1 | Exon 4 | R119Q | 209113151 | 209113151 | 1 | 1/2 |
PDGFRA | Exon 13 | G594fs | 55141059 | 55141059 | 1 | 1/8 |
- Citation: He SY, Li YC, Wang Y, Peng HL, Zhou CL, Zhang CM, Chen SL, Yin JF, Lin M. Fecal gene detection based on next generation sequencing for colorectal cancer diagnosis. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(25): 2920-2936
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i25/2920.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i25.2920