Han CQ, Tang XL, Zhang Q, Nie C, Liu J, Ding Z. Predictors of pain response after endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis for abdominal pain caused by pancreatic malignancy. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27(1): 69-79 [PMID: 33505151 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i1.69]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Zhen Ding, MD, PhD, Doctor, Professor, Teacher, Division of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No. 1277 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan 430022, Hubei Province, China. 2017xh0122@hust.edu.cn
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2021; 27(1): 69-79 Published online Jan 7, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i1.69
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis [n (%), n = 58]
Independent variables
Total number
Age in yr, range (mean)
54–73 (67)
Gender, female/male
25/33
Symptom
Abdominal pain concomitant with jaundice Tumor largest dimension in mm, range (mean)
6 (10.3)
Ascites, slight or mild
24–100 (44.3)
Tumor location
4 (6.9)
Pancreatic head/neck
Pancreatic body/tail
18 (31.0)
Initial VAS score, range (mean)
40 (69.0)
Tramadol use before EUS-CPN
6-10 (8)
Dose in mg, range (mean)
51 (87.9)
Ganglia visualized
0-240 (40)
Invasion of celiac plexus
42 (72.4)
Distant metastasis
16 (27.6)
Injected alcohol dose in mL, range (mean)
26 (44.8)
Procedure method
5–20 (10)
Unilateral
Bilateral
33 (56.9)
Intra-procedural decrease in heart rate
25 (43.1)
decrease of ≥ 5 beats for ≥ 10 s
48 (82.8)
Table 2 Univariable analysis of variables associated with pain response after 1 wk in the enrolled cohort of 58 patients
Independent variables
OR
95%CI
P value
Age in yr
1.084
0.60-3.88
0.212
Gender, female/male
1.39
0.43-3.79
0.64
Symptom
Abdominal pain concomitant with jaundice
1.29
0.53–3.26
0.581
Tumor largest dimension
1.32
0.45-4.69
0.665
Ascites
1.772
0.59–6.84
0.437
Tumor location
Pancreatic head/neck
2.071
0.60-7.09
0.232
Pancreatic body/tail
0.617
0.65-10.40
0.094
Initial VAS score
2.231
0.76-5.41
0.132
Tramadol use before EUS-CPN
1.339
0.54-15.39
0.327
Invisible ganglia
3.574
1.80-14.24
0.003
Invasion of celiac plexus
7.922
2.24-25.93
0.001
Distant metastasis
5.94
1.31–11.82
0.015
Injected alcohol dose
3.825
1.12–13.42
0.437
Procedure method
Unilateral
1.677
0.84–11.48
0.591
Bilateral
0.489
0.11–1.12
0.087
Intra-procedural decrease in heart rate
1.011
0.91–2.08
0.933
Table 3 Multivariate analysis for predictors affecting pain response after 1 wk by endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis
Independent variables
OR
95%CI
P value
Ganglia invisible
4.9
2.25-17.91
0.011
Invasion of celiac plexus
13.2
3.02-46.27
0.003
Distant metastasis
6.84
2.34–19.15
0.022
Table 4 Univariable analysis of variables associated with pain response after 4 wk in the enrolled cohort of 58 patients
Independent variables
OR
95%CI
P value
Age in yr
1.091
0.63-3.94
0.209
Gender, female/male
1.124
0.47-3.99
0.532
Symptom
Abdominal pain concomitant with
1.384
0.43–4.82
0.618
jaundice
1.496
0.32-5.92
0.701
Tumor largest dimension
1.921
0.79–9.34
0.408
Ascites
Tumor location
3.59
0.40-10.06
0.184
Pancreatic head/neck
0.42
0.15-12.77
0.082
Pancreatic body/tail
2.93
0.42-8.17
0.101
Initial VAS score
2.91
0.24-19.40
0.149
Tramadol use before EUS-CPN
4.02
1.62-13.27
0.003
Invisible ganglia
8.84
2.11-23.32
0.001
Invasion of celiac plexus
7.83
1.81–15.77
0.009
Distant metastasis
4.90
1.32–17.91
0.394
Injected alcohol dose
Procedure method
2.87
0.44–17.41
0.502
Unilateral
0.54
0.16–1.99
0.093
Bilateral
0.94
0.42–3.12
0.858
Intra-procedural decrease in heart rate
Table 5 Multivariate analysis for predictors affecting pain response after 4 wk by endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis
Independent variables
OR
95%CI
P value
Invisible ganglia
5.85
2.66-22.73
0.037
Invasion of celiac plexus
15.11
4.01-51.22
0.001
Distant metastasis
8.59
2.16–27.02
0.019
Citation: Han CQ, Tang XL, Zhang Q, Nie C, Liu J, Ding Z. Predictors of pain response after endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis for abdominal pain caused by pancreatic malignancy. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27(1): 69-79