Published online Jan 7, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i1.69
Peer-review started: July 4, 2020
First decision: August 8, 2020
Revised: August 15, 2020
Accepted: November 12, 2020
Article in press: November 12, 2020
Published online: January 7, 2021
Processing time: 178 Days and 22.3 Hours
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis (EUS-CPN) has gained popularity as a minimally invasive approach and is currently widely used to treat pancreatic cancer-associated pain. However, response to treatment is variable.
To identify the efficacy of EUS-CPN and explore determinants of pain response in EUS-CPN for pancreatic cancer-associated pain.
A retrospective study of 58 patients with abdominal pain due to inoperable pancreatic cancer who underwent EUS-CPN were included. The efficacy for palliation of pain was evaluated based on the visual analog scale pain score at 1 wk and 4 wk after EUS-CPN. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to explore predictors of pain response.
A good pain response was obtained in 74.1% and 67.2% of patients at 1 wk and 4 wk, respectively. Tumors located in the body/tail of the pancreas and patients receiving bilateral treatment were weakly associated with a good outcome. Multivariate analysis revealed patients with invisible ganglia and metastatic disease were significant factors for a negative response to EUS-CPN at 1 wk and 4 wk, respectively, particularly for invasion of the celiac plexus (odds ratio (OR) = 13.20, P = 0.003 for 1 wk and OR = 15.11, P = 0.001 for 4 wk). No severe adverse events were reported.
EUS-CPN is a safe and effective form of treatment for intractable pancreatic cancer-associated pain. Invisible ganglia, distant metastasis, and invasion of the celiac plexus were predictors of less effective response in EUS-CPN for pancreatic cancer-related pain. For these patients, efficacy warrants attention.
Core Tip: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis (EUS-CPN) is widely used to treat pancreatic cancer-associated pain. However, response to treatment is variable. The procedure is not always effective, is often variable, and yields transient results. The data on determinants of pain relief response following EUS-CPN are limited and still need to undergo further exploration. Our study found that invisible ganglia, presence of distant metastases, and celiac plexus invasion were considered to be significantly negative variables. The strongest predictor of response was celiac plexus invasion. Moreover, tumors located at the body/tail predicted a better response than those with tumors at the pancreatic head/neck.