Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2015; 21(28): 8678-8686
Published online Jul 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i28.8678
Published online Jul 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i28.8678
Table 1 Analytical studies on pancreatic cancer screening
Study | Type of study (number of subjects) | Country | Duration of follow-up | Measured outcome |
Canto et al[12], 2006 | Prospective controlled study | About 3 yr | Different diagnostic rate of PC, tumor type and screening complications | |
(n = 227) | United States | |||
Kim et al[13], 2011 | Retrospective | Different tumor type, curative resection, median survival, 3-yr survival rate | ||
controlled study | Korea | - | ||
(n = 60) | ||||
Potjer et al[14], 2013 | Prospective controlled study | A minimum of 1 yr | Different tumor type, frequency and behavior of precursor lesions | |
(n = 241) | Netherland | |||
Lachter et al[15], 2007 | Retrospective | Different diagnostic rate of PC, the number of operations | ||
controlled study | Israel | - | ||
(n = 134) | ||||
Zubarik et al[16], 2011 | Prospective controlled study | Different diagnostic rate of PC, tumor type, screening complications and cost of detection | ||
(n = 670) | United States | 1 yr |
Table 2 Non-controlled studies on pancreatic cancer screening
Study (author/year) | Country | Study population n (HRIs%) | Period of time | Pancreatic tumor, n (%) | PC/death, n (%) |
Langer et al[17], 2009 | Germany | 76 (100) | 5 yr | 6 (7.9) | 0 (0)/0 (0) |
Rulyak et al[18], 2001 | United States | 35 (100) | 2 yr | 12 (34.3) | 0 (0)/0 (0) |
Sud et al[19], 2014 | United States | 30 (63.3) | 3 yr | 3 (10) | 2 (6.7)/0 (0) |
Al-Sukhni et al[20], 2012 | Canada | 262 (60.9) | 8 yr | 84 (32.1) | 3 (1.1)/2 (0.8%) |
Verna et al[21], 2010 | United States | 51 (100) | 3 yr | 20 (39.2) | 2 (3.9)/0 (0) |
Poley et al[22], 2009 | Netherland | 44 (47.7) | 2 yr | 10 (22.7) | 3 (6.8)/2 (4.5) |
Ludwig et al[23], 2011 | United States | 109 (100) | 7 yr | 9 (8.3) | 1 (0.9)/0 (0) |
Brentnall et al[24], 1999 | United States | 14 (100) | 15 mo | 7 (50) | 0 (0)/0 (0) |
Canto et al[25], 2012 | United States | 216 (90) | 28.8 mo | 92 (45.6) | 0 (0)/0 (0) |
Table 3 Studies on precursor lesions
Category | Surgery, n | Follow-up, n | Complications and prognosis |
PanIN | 17 | 0 | Just one patient had a fistula after surgery |
IPMN | 11 | 97 | No relapse or canceration after surgery or follow-up |
IPMN + PanIN | 6 | 0 | No relapse or canceration after surgery |
Mass lesions | 3 | 0 | One patient died after surgery; two patients relapsed then treated with chemotherapy |
Cytological HGD | 7 | 0 | No relapse or canceration after surgery; one patient had hemorrhage 13 mo later |
Table 4 Prospective studies on psychological function
Study | Country | Type of study (number of subjects) | Result |
Maheu et al[29], 2010 | Canada | Prospective controlled study (n = 198) | Non-significant increase in risk perception, cancer worry, or general distress |
Breitkopf et al[30], 2012 | United States | Prospective controlled study (n = 1406) | HRIs had a greater perceived risk of PC and higher levels of PC worry than controls |
- Citation: Lu C, Xu CF, Wan XY, Zhu HT, Yu CH, Li YM. Screening for pancreatic cancer in familial high-risk individuals: A systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(28): 8678-8686
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i28/8678.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i28.8678