Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2013; 19(23): 3649-3657
Published online Jun 21, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i23.3649
Published online Jun 21, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i23.3649
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the patients
Characteristics | 5-yr survival group | 10-yr survival group | P value |
No. of patients | 1516 | 520 | |
Mean age (yr) | 50.45 ± 12.32 | 50.37 ± 11.59 | 0.102 |
Female/male patients | 166/1350 | 58/462 | 0.935 |
No. of tumors | 0.000 | ||
1 | 1285 | 484 | |
2 | 206 | 33 | |
≥ 3 | 25 | 2 | |
No. of treatments | 0.000 | ||
Surgery | 1100 | 410 | |
TACE | 2356 | 576 | |
RFA | 656 | 109 | |
Mean | 2.71 (4112/1516) | 2.11 (1095/520) | |
Microvascular invasion | 7 | 3 | |
Histology | 0.381 | ||
Well | 320 | 104 | |
Moderate | 580 | 184 | |
Poor | 382 | 144 | |
HBsAg | 0.104 | ||
Positive | 948 | 342 | |
Negative | 568 | 178 | |
Cirrhosis | 0.000 | ||
Absence | 1396 (91.1%) | 508 (97.7%) | |
Present | 120 (7.9%) | 12 (2.3%) | |
Position of lesion | 0.246 | ||
Left lobe | 87 | 126 | |
Right lobe | 1334 | 423 | |
Both lobes | 25 | 5 | |
Lesion diameter, n (cm) | 0.651 | ||
≤ 3 | 214 (2.26 ± 0.62)1 | 82 (2.27 ± 0.69)1 | |
> 3- ≤ 5 | 404 (4.22 ± 0.60)1 | 143 (4.20 ± 0.61)1 | |
> 5-< 10 | 560 (12.44 ± 1.98)1 | 190 (7.31 ± 1.28)1 | |
≥ 10 | 338 (7.24 ± 1.40)1 | 105 (11.94 ± 1.80)1 | |
Mean | 1516 (6.89 ± 3.69) | 520 (6.58 ± 3.44) | |
Child-Pugh classification | 0.383 | ||
Class A | 1466 | 505 | |
Class B | 50 | 15 | |
TNM stage | 0.109 | ||
I | 387 | 90 | |
II | 1096 | 422 | |
III | 33 | 8 | |
α-fetoprotein, ng/mL | |||
≤ 100 | 712 (22.50 ± 23.59)1 | 261 (19.78 ± 17.93)1 | 0.528 |
100-400 | 186 (257.92 ± 92.89)1 | 48 (204.91 ± 81.92)1 | 0.129 |
≥ 400 | 618 (16661.32 ± 28889.57)1 | 211 (15302.74 ± 23346.16)1 | 0.853 |
Liver function, mean ± SD | |||
Total bilirubin, mg/dL | 19.65 ± 10.03 | 21.04 ± 38.16 | 0.080 |
AST, U/L | 50.82 ± 26.46 | 51.72 ± 37.24 | 0.145 |
ALT, U/L | 48.71 ± 27.35 | 45.32 ± 30.95 | 0.053 |
γ-glutamyltransferase, U/L | 71.54 ± 43.62 | 64.42 ± 46.07 | 0.069 |
Table 2 Comparison of treatment modalities between 5-year survival group and 10-year survival group for hepatocellular carcinoma
Treatment modalities by tumor type | 5-yr survival group | 10-yr survival group | P value between groups | P value between overall groups |
No. of treatment modalities | 0.092 | |||
Surgery alone | 609 | 235 | ||
TACE alone | 214 | 80 | ||
Surgery + TACE | 458 | 125 | ||
TACE + RFA | 85 | 28 | ||
Surgery + TACE + RFA | 150 | 52 | ||
Tumor size ≤ 5 cm (maximum diameter) | 0.097 | |||
Surgery alone | 244 (3.53 ± 1.03) | 100 (3.48 ± 1.06) | 0.217 | |
TACE alone | 92 (2.59 ± 1.16) | 38 (3.58 ± 1.16) | 0.087 | |
Surgery + TACE | 133 (3.90 ± 1.02) | 43 (3.47 ± 1.03) | 0.192 | |
TACE + RFA | 72 (3.10 ± 1.16) | 21 (2.93 ± 1.10) | 0.824 | |
Surgery + TACE + RFA | 82 (3.88 ± 0.91) | 26 (3.42 ± 0.98) | 0.314 | |
Tumor size > 5 cm (maximum diameter) | 0.106 | |||
Surgery alone | 365 (8.16 ± 2.27) | 135 (8.532 ± 2.71) | 0.130 | |
TACE alone | 122 (9.31 ± 2.94) | 42 (9.36 ± 2.26) | 0.925 | |
Surgery + TACE | 325 (9.59 ± 3.16) | 82 (9.09 ± 2.50) | 0.624 | |
TACE + RFA | 13 (11.68 ± 3.74) | 7 (10.47 ± 5.59) | 0.548 | |
Surgery + TACE + RFA | 68 (7.19 ± 3.02) | 26 (10.65 ± 4.63) | 0.131 | |
Uninodular HCC | 0.039 | |||
Surgery alone | 531 | 223 | ||
TACE alone | 178 | 75 | ||
Surgery + TACE | 382 | 113 | ||
TACE + RFA | 57 | 24 | ||
Surgery + TACE + RFA | 100 | 50 | ||
Multinodular HCC | ||||
Surgery alone | 78 | 12 | ||
TACE alone | 36 | 5 | ||
Surgery + TACE | 76 | 12 | ||
TACE + RFA | 28 | 4 | 0.445 | |
Surgery + TACE + RFA | 50 | 2 | ||
AFP > 400 ng/mL (AFP value) | 0.289 | |||
Surgery alone | 280 (16053.09 ± 27804.11) | 102 (18092.07 ± 26818.62) | 0.450 | |
TACE alone | 66 (15876.11 ± 30406.63) | 28 (10984.83 ± 18402.28) | 0.270 | |
Surgery + TACE | 188 (21164.79 ± 31964.15) | 47 (25114.26 ± 31807.02) | 0.385 | |
TACE + RFA | 32 (742.50 ± 0.00) | 12 (22597.20 ± 28745.64) | 0.667 | |
Surgery + TACE + RFA | 56 (1884.33 ± 953.25) | 19 (8789.88 ± 21862.41) | 0.091 | |
AFP < 400 ng/mL (AFP value) | 0.065 | |||
Surgery alone | 329 (45.50 ± 71.08) | 133 (56.35 ± 91.86) | 0.853 | |
TACE alone | 148 (38.60 ± 71.56) | 52 (38.09 ± 48.30) | 0.355 | |
Surgery + TACE | 270 (66.35 ± 98.86) | 78 (43.02 ± 74.45) | 0.738 | |
TACE + RFA | 69 (133.34 ± 145.64) | 16 (44.81 ± 43.02) | 0.579 | |
Surgery + TACE + RFA | 94 (96.06 ± 138.35) | 33 (15.43 ± 8.21) | 0.064 |
Table 3 Comparison of treatmentefficacy between the 5-year survival group and 10-year survival group for hepatocellular carcinoma
Characteristics | 5-yr survival group | P value | 10-yr survival group | P value | P value between groups |
AFP the first time before and after treatment (ng/mL) | |||||
Surgery | 0.002 | 0.000 | |||
Before surgery | 1020 (4596.63 ± 17193.11) | 358 (7419.90 ± 18412.64) | 0.049 | ||
After surgery | 1020 (1133.25 ± 4530.36) | 358 (1255.09 ± 4337.24) | 0.070 | ||
TACE | 0.039 | 0.002 | |||
Before TACE | 496 (4510.68 ± 15115.73) | 162 (2827.99 ± 9506.04) | 0.446 | ||
After TACE | 496 (1732.58 ± 7631.56) | 162 (502.21 ± 1526.13) | 0.711 | ||
Liver function the first time before and after treatment | |||||
Total bilirubin (mg/dL) | 0.721 | 0.353 | |||
Before treatment | 68.32 ± 58.98 | 19.63 ± 12.65 | 0.078 | ||
After treatment | 67.22 ± 69.45 | 18.76 ± 11.56 | 0.120 | ||
AST (U/L) | 0.983 | 0.730 | |||
Before treatment | 51.99 ± 28.41 | 52.69 ± 40.86 | 0.137 | ||
After treatment | 50.87 ± 27.50 | 52.42 ± 39.77 | 0.695 | ||
ALT (U/L) | 0.104 | 0.262 | |||
Before treatment | 52.46 ± 37.21 | 50.69 ± 53.10 | 0.291 | ||
After treatment | 54.60 ± 42.26 | 51.16 ± 50.09 | 0.126 | ||
γ-glutamyltransferase (U/L) | 0.366 | 0.017 | |||
Before treatment | 19.30 ± 8.09 | 69.85 ± 93.75 | 0.122 | ||
After treatment | 19.53 ± 8.32 | 58.79 ± 67.08 | 0.670 | ||
Time to first tumor recurrence or metastasis (d) | 0.012 | 0.045 | |||
Surgery alone | 90 (1031.36 ± 662.61) | 38 (3246.38 ± 2047.29) | 0.003 | ||
TACE alone | 32 (675.64 ± 412.31) | 12 (1882.77 ± 1324.08) | 0.015 | ||
Surgery + TACE | 225 (1012.00 ± 818.86) | 70 (2778.30 ± 6296.35) | 0.007 | ||
Surgery + TACE + RFA | 90 (798.41 ± 492.01) | 52 (2553.20 ± 1746.48) | 0.016 |
Table 4 Comparison of univariate analysis for various prognostic factors between 5-year survival and 10-year survival groups for hepatocellular carcinoma
Factor | 5-yr survival group | 10-yr survival group | ||
Exp (B) 95%CI | P value | Exp (B) 95%CI | P value | |
Sex (men and women) | 0.787 (0.678-0.913) | 0.002 | 0.875 (0.667-1.146) | 0.332 |
Age (yr) (< 50 and ≥ 50) | 0.516 (0.462-0.575) | 0.000 | 1.097 (0.838-1.438) | 0.500 |
Diameter of largest tumor | 0.971 (0.921-1.023) | 0.274 | 0.961 (0.879-1.051) | 0.384 |
Child-Pugh classification | 0.070 (0.060-0.082) | 0.000 | 0.559 (0.334-0.938) | 0.028 |
No. of tumors | 1.452 (1.284-1.642) | 0.000 | 0.390 (0.261-0.582) | 0.000 |
Pretreatment serum AFP level | 1.041 (0.987-1.099) | 0.138 | 0.933 (0.851-1.022) | 0.137 |
Cirrhosis | 0.832 (0.775-0.893) | 0.000 | 10.539 (8.164-13.606) | 0.000 |
TNM stage | 0.739 (0.662-0.862) | 0.000 | 0.911 (0.739-1.124) | 0.384 |
Treatment methods | 1.152 (1.109-1.197) | 0.000 | 1.043 (0.975-1.115) | 0.220 |
Microvascular invasion | 1.038 (0.494-2.181) | 0.922 | 1.233 (0.396-3.838) | 0.718 |
Table 5 Comparison of multivariate analysis for various prognostic factors between 5-year survival and 10-year survival groups for hepatocellular carcinoma
Group | Sex | Age | Micro-vascular | Pretreatment | Diameter of tumor | Treatment methods | TNM stage | Child-Pugh | No. of tumors | Cirrhosis |
invasion | AFP level | classification | ||||||||
5-yr survival | 0.344 | 0.004 | 0.033 | 0.080 | 0.211 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.040 | 0.000 |
(P value) | ||||||||||
10-yr survival | 0.983 | 0.962 | 0.370 | 0.783 | 0.847 | 0.215 | 0.695 | 0.029 | 0.025 | 0.000 |
(P value) |
- Citation: Wu KT, Wang CC, Lu LG, Zhang WD, Zhang FJ, Shi F, Li CX. Hepatocellular carcinoma: Clinical study of long-term survival and choice of treatment modalities. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(23): 3649-3657
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i23/3649.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i23.3649