Copyright
©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2010; 16(16): 2010-2016
Published online Apr 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i16.2010
Published online Apr 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i16.2010
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of subjects in the NaP, PEG and control groups n (%)
Characteristics | NaP group (n = 224) | PEG group (n = 113) | Control group (n = 672) | P |
Age (yr) | 46.9 ± 8.6 | 51.1 ± 10.5 | 46.9 ± 8.6 | < 0.001 |
Gender | 0.453 | |||
Male | 149 (67) | 81 (72) | 475 (71) | |
Female | 75 (33) | 32 (28) | 197 (29) | |
Body mass index (kg/m2) | 23.4 ± 3.1 | 23.8 ± 2.7 | 23.6 ± 2.9 | 0.496 |
Hypertension | 50 (22) | 34 (30) | 188 (28) | 0.186 |
Diabetes mellitus | 29 (13) | 23 (20) | 134 (20) | 0.056 |
Serum phosphate1 (mg/dL) | 88.9 ± 14.5 | 95.3 ± 17.4 | 91.6 ± 17.4 | 0.004 |
Table 2 Comparison of the creatinine level and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) among NaP, PEG and control groups (mean ± SD)
Evaluation time | Creatinine level (mg/dL) | GFR (mL/min per 1.73 m2) | ||||||
NaP group | PEG group | Control group | P | NaP group | PEG group | Control group | P | |
Baseline | 1.12 ± 0.15 | 1.12 ± 0.16 | 1.12 ± 0.15 | 0.985 | 69.03 ± 7.74 | 68.91 ± 7.95 | 69.57 ± 6.67 | 0.467 |
Follow-up 12–24 mo later | 1.15 ± 0.15 | 1.15 ± 0.18 | 1.15 ± 0.15 | 0.928 | 66.46 ± 7.78 | 66.47 ± 8.26 | 67.42 ± 6.39 | 0.118 |
Table 3 Multivariate linear regression model on change in creatinine and GFR from baseline to 12-24 mo
Variable | Creatinine (R2 = 0.016) | GFR (R2 = 0.053) | ||
Correlation coefficient (95% CI) | P | Correlation coefficient (95% CI) | P | |
Baseline | -0.018 (-0.057 to 0.021) | 0.366 | -0.135 (-0.187 to -0.083) | < 0.001 |
Group effect (NaP, PEG and control groups) | 0.002 (-0.004 to 0.009) | 0.489 | -0.247 (-0.685 to 0.191) | 0.269 |
Age at baseline creatinine and GFR measurement | 0.000 (0.000 to 0.001) | 0.433 | -0.036 (-0.077 to 0.006) | 0.094 |
Hypertension | 0.007 (-0.009 to 0.023) | 0.365 | -0.748 (-1.774 to 0.277) | 0.152 |
Diabetes mellitus | -0.016 (-0.034 to 0.002) | 0.079 | 1.082 (-0.076 to 2.240) | 0.067 |
Body mass index | 0.001 (-0.001 to 0.003) | 0.208 | -0.038 (-0.162 to 0.086) | 0.545 |
Serum phosphate | -0.001 (-0.004 to 0.003) | 0.733 | 0.020 (-0.205 to 0.246) | 0.859 |
Table 4 Description of the design, demographic characteristics, and effect estimate in previous studies
Design | Population | Race (%) | Control | Timing of Follow-up | Association between NaP exposure and incident kidney injury | |
Abaskharoun et al[9] | RC | Any patients who had outpatient CFS | Not reported | PEG | 3 mo-9 yr | No |
Brunelli et al[10] | CC | Any patients who had outpatient CFS | White 46%, Non-white 52%, Unknown 2.3% | Any non-NaP preparation | Within 6 mo | No |
Hurst et al[11] | RC | Any patients who had screening CFS | White 54%, Black 19%, Unknown 27% | PEG | Within 1 yr | Yes |
Khurana et al[12] | RC | Any patients1 | White 84%, Black 8%, Hispanic 7%, Asian 0.5% | No bowel preparation | 6-9 mo/ 12-18 mo | Yes |
Russmann et al[13] | RC | Any patients who had CFS | Not reported | PEG | Within 6 mo | No |
Singal et al[14] | RC | Any patients who had CFS | White 27%, Black 53%, Hispanic 20%, Asian 0.3% | PEG | Within 1 yr | Yes |
- Citation: Seol DC, Hong SN, Kim JH, Sung IK, Park HS, Lee JH, Shim CS. Change in renal function after sodium phosphate preparation for screening colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(16): 2010-2016
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i16/2010.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i16.2010