Published online Dec 15, 1998. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v4.i6.524
Revised: September 20, 1998
Accepted: November 14, 1998
Published online: December 15, 1998
AIM: To study the antagonism of cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8) against the effect of morphine and its mechanism.
METHODS: The method and mechanical activities of rat duodenum in vitro were recorded simultaneously.
RESULTS: Acetylcholine (ACh) could increase the amplitude and the number of the spike potential (SPA and SPN) of rat duodenum in vitro, followed by the increase of the duodenal contraction amplitudes (CA), showing a positive correlation. Morphine, on the contrary, inhibited the potentiation of ACh, showing a negative correlation. CCK-8 could antagonize the effects of morphine, i.e. the SPA and SPN were increased again, followed by the increase of CA. CCK-A receptor antagonist Devazepide could reverse the antagonism of CCK-8 to the effect of morphine.
CONCLUSION: CCK-8 could antagonize the effect of morphine which inhibited the potentiation of ACh on the duodenal activities in vitro. The antagonistic effect of CCK-8 on morphine was mainly mediated by CCK-A receptor.
- Citation: Xu MY, Lu HM, Wang SZ, Shi WY, Wang XC, Yang DX, Yang CX, Yang LZ. Effect of devazepide reversed antagonism of CCK-8 against morphine on electrical and mechanical activities of rat duodenum in vitro. World J Gastroenterol 1998; 4(6): 524-526
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v4/i6/524.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v4.i6.524
Cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8) is a typical brain-gut peptide. Many data show that CCK-8 has been the strongest endogenous anti-opioid substance up to now. Faris pointed out that CCK-8 could block morphine analgesia in the rat tail flick test[1]. Han[2] and Xu[3] reported respectively that CCK-8 antagonized the analgesic effects of morphine and electroacupuncture (EA), and played an important role in the induction of morphine tolerance and EA tolerance using the behavioral changes and electrophysiological methods. Zetler indicated that morphine and opioid peptides antagonized the hyperfunction of contraction of guinea-pig ileum in vitro induced by CCK-8 like peptide[4]. Valeri proved that endogenous opioid peptides could antagonize the effects of CCK-8, in the similar experiment[5]. But few report about the anti-opioid effect of CCK-8 on the duodenum in vitro was found.
In this experiment, the method of simultaneously recording the electrical and mechanical activities of rat duodenum in vitro was adopted so as to inquire into the antagonism of CCK-8 to the effect of morphine and its mechanism.
Twenty-five Wistar rats (Grade II, 195 g-295 g), Animal Department of Tumour Institute of Heilongjiang Province, were used.
Tyrode’s solution (made by ourselves); Acetylcholine (ACh, 300 nmol/L, Shanghai Third Reagent Factory, China); morphine hydrochloridum (330 nmol/L, Shenyang First Pharmaceutical Factory, China); CCK-8 (0.7 nmol/L, Squibb, USA); Devazepide (10 nmol/L, Merck Sharp and Dohme Researched Laboratories, USA).
A rat was given peritoneal anaesthesia with 20% urethan (5 mL/kg), the peritoneum was opened and one or two segments of 2 cm duodenum were cut off under pylorus. The duodenal segments were put into a bathtube containing 50 mL Tyrode’s solution which was 38¡æ and saturated with oxygen. Then the bathtube was maintained at 38 °C in CS-501 superthermostat. One end of duodenal segment was fixed with resting load of 5 g and the other end was connected with a LZ-1 tension transducer according to longitudinal axis of jejunum. Thus contractions of duodenal smooth muscle were recorded. The electrical activities of duodenum were led out by silver adsorptive electrode. Through bioelectrical amplifier, the electrical activities, mechanical contraction and time scale were simultaneously recorded by ST-41 multipurpose polygraph. The parameters were modulated as follows: time constant 0.3 s, high frequency wave filter 30 Hz, electrical gain 3, mechanical gain 4, recording paper velocity 5 mm/s[6].
Firstly, normal electrical and mechanical activities of every segment of duodenum was simultaneously recorded. Then 200 μL of ACh was injected quickly into the bathtube by a microinjector. Sixty seconds after the injection of ACh, 50 μL of morphine hydrochloridum was administered. At 120 s and 240 s, 40 μL CCK-8 and 20 μL Devazepide were added respectively.
Each value was expressed as x-±s. All data were analyzed with paired t test.
Before the injection of ACh, the amplitudes and numbers of the spike potential (SPA and SPN) of 44 duodenal segments and their corresponding contraction amplitudes (CA) respectively averaged 0.70 ± 0.04 mV, 2.41 ± 0.13 and 16.58 mm ± 0.65 mm. At 60 seconds after the injection of ACh, the SPA, SPN and corresponding CA increased to 0.97 mV ± 0.05 mV, 2.46 ± 0.11 and 24.50 mm ± 0.99 mm, respectively. At this time, morphine was administered. The SPA, SPN and CA decreased to 0.63 mV ± 0.04 mV, 2.38 ± 0.08 and 14.73 mm ± 0.69 mm respectively at 60 s after the injection of morphine. At 120 s after adding CCK-8, the SPA, SPN and CA increased to 0.84 mV ± 0.04 mV, 3.29 ± 0.09 and 22.77 mm ± 0.68 mm, respectively. Moreover, all of them showed significant differences (P < 0.01) when the latter was compared with the corresponding item of the former (Figure 1).
Figure 2 showed the electrical and mechanical change curves of one segment of duodenum simultaneously recorded by multipurpose polygraph. It indicated that the SPA and SPN of the duodenal segment increased, followed by the increase of the CA after the injection of ACh, showing the enhancement of duodenal activities. Whereas the SPA, SPN and corresponding CA were reduced when morphine was administrated, showing that morphine inhibited the excitatory effects of ACh. At this moment, the injection of CCK-8 increased the SPA, SPN as well as CA, suggesting an antagonism of morphine effect by CCK-8. On the basis of the above, after CCK-A receptor antagonist Devazepide was administrated, the SPA and SPN were decreased again, accompanied by the reduction of CA. It showed that Devazepide reversed the anti-morphine effect of CCK-8. Moreover, every contraction wave occured after the beginning of spike potential over the slow potential and the ratio between slow potential and contraction wave was 1:1.
The statistical analytical results of 22 duodenal segments are shown in Table 1.
Items | Control | Ach | Morphine | CCK-8 | Devazepide |
n = 22 | 300 nmol/L | 330 nmol/L | 0.7 nmol/L | 10 nmol/L | |
(0 s) | (60 s) | (120 s) | (240 s) | (325 s) | |
SPA (mV) | 0.70 ± 0.07 | 0.94 ± 0.09b | 0.59 ± 0.06d | 0.81 ± 0.07f | 0.54 ± 0.05h |
SPN | 2.71 ± 0.23 | 3.88 ± 0.15b | 2.71 ± 0.09d | 3.52 ± 0.13f | 2.66 ± 0.18h |
CA (mm) | 16.40 ± 1.00 | 24.44 ± 1.63b | 13.54 ± 1.04d | 22.73 ± 1.00f | 13.67 ± 0.66h |
CCK-8 was the first brain-gut peptide found in human. CCK-8 existed in brain and peripheral tissues of animals and human[7]. Previous works indicated that an antagonistic interaction might occur between CCK and opioid peptides. Our experimental results demonstrated that CCK-8 per second did not show any effect, but could selectively antagonize the effects of morphine which inhibited the potentiation of ACh to rat duodenum in vitro with the electrical and mechanical activities. The conclusion was similar to those previous reports[4,5].
Recent receptor binding studies have confirmed the existence of 2 distinct CCK receptor subtypes, i.e. CCK-A and CCK-B receptor were present in both brain and peripheral tissues[8]. Devazepide was considerably more potent in inhibiting CCK binding to peripheral-type receptor (CCK-A) than to brain-type receptor (CCK-B)[9]. This results showed that Devazepide could reverse the antagonism of CCK-8 to the effect of morphine, therefore it was inferred that CCK-A receptor participates in the anti-morphine effect of CCK-8.
To sum up, our present work firstly demonstrated that CCK-8 could antagonize the elimination of morphine on the potentiations of ACh to duodenal activities, and these effects were mediated by CCK-A receptor. It is suggested that CCK-like peptides and opioid substances together with cholinergic system could regulate the gastrointestinal activities, and provided a new experimental basis for further research in the clinical treatment of the intestinal motility disturbances.
Project supported by the Scientific Technological Foundation of Provincial Education Committee of Heilongjiang in China, No. 95-8.
1. | Faris PL, Komisaruk BR, Watkins LR, Mayer DJ. Evidence for the neuropeptide cholecystokinin as an antagonist of opiate analgesia. Science. 1983;219:310-312. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 483] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 496] [Article Influence: 12.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
2. | Han JS, Ding XZ, Fan SG. Is cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8) a candidate for endogenous anti-opioid substrates? Neuropeptides. 1985;5:399-402. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 81] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 83] [Article Influence: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
3. | Xu MY, Sun MZ, Zhang LM, Han JS. CCK antagonizes morphine action on activities of pain-related neurons in nucleus parafascicularis. China J Physiol Sci. 1992;8:6-12. [Cited in This Article: ] |
4. | Zetler G. Antagonism of cholecystokinin-like peptides by opioid peptides, morphine or tetrodotoxin. Eur J Pharmacol. 1979;60:67-77. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 57] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 57] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
5. | Valeri P, Morrone LA, Pimpinella G, Romanelli L. Some pharmacological characteristics of the guinea pig ileum opioid system activated by cholecystokinin. Neuropharmacology. 1990;29:231-236. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 21] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21] [Article Influence: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
6. | Yang XP, Xu MY, Ni J, Wang SZ, Bian SL, Gu CR. Electrical change and mechanical contraction of rat jejunum in vitro and their relationship. J Harbin Med Univ. 1994;28:87-90. [Cited in This Article: ] |
7. | Vanderhaeghen JJ, Signeau JC, Gepts W. New peptide in the vertebrate CNS reacting with antigastrin antibodies. Nature. 1975;257:604-605. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 597] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 624] [Article Influence: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
8. | Hill DR, Campbell NJ, Shaw TM, Woodruff GN. Autoradiographic localization and biochemical characterization of peripheral type CCK receptors in rat CNS using highly selective nonpeptide CCK antagonists. J Neurosci. 1987;7:2967-2976. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
9. | Chang RS, Lotti VJ. Biochemical and pharmacological characterization of an extremely potent and selective nonpeptide cholecystokinin antagonist. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986;83:4923-4926. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 310] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 332] [Article Influence: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |