Published online Aug 14, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i30.4231
Peer-review started: May 12, 2022
First decision: May 28, 2022
Revised: May 31, 2022
Accepted: July 18, 2022
Article in press: July 18, 2022
Published online: August 14, 2022
Processing time: 89 Days and 21 Hours
Alcohol intake is a risk factor for cancer development and metastatic disease progression. Extracellular vesicle (EV)-mediated interorgan communication is assumed to be significant in boosting tumorigenic pathways and disease progression. Recent research indicates that exosomes have a variety of roles in the development of cancer during pathophysiological conditions. The involvement of EV signaling during cancer progression in the alcohol environment is unknown. Therefore, understanding communication networks and the role of EVs as biomarkers can contribute significantly to developing strategies to address the serious public health problems associated with alcohol consumption and cancer.
Core Tip: In this letter to the editor, we discussed the reality that alcohol consumption is a risk factor that acts by itself to favor the appearance of the carcinogenic process and its harmful evolution towards metastatic pathology. One of the hypotheses that have been suggested as important in metastasis and communication between cells and/or organs is the traffic of extracellular vesicles/exosomes that can play or promote tumorigenesis locally and even at a distance from the primary tumor. Unraveling these communication mechanisms and therapeutic possibilities may lead to new ways to combat cancer’s worsening, as metastasis, in the future.
- Citation: Muro M, Collados-Ros A, Legaz I. Alcohol-related diseases and liver metastasis: Role of cell-free network communication. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(30): 4231-4234
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i30/4231.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i30.4231
We have read with great attention and particular interest the review by Kuracha et al[1] entitled: “Role of cell-free network communication in alcohol-associated disorders and liver metastasis”. The authors highlight the many implications of extracellular vesicle (EV) (exosome) communications across organs in this review, focusing on the role of EVs in alcohol-related illnesses and cancer metastasis. It is crucial to consider the impact of EV cargo and release along a multi-organ axis on tumorigenic pathways and metastatic disease.
Alcohol consumption negatively impacts people’s health and quality of life, contributing to more than 5% of the global disease burden and early death[2,3]. Alcohol intake has been linked to several neoplastic diseases, including colorectal, head and neck, esophageal, liver, breast, and pancreatic cancers[4,5]. On the other hand, recent research suggests that exosomes have different functions in disease progression during pathophysiological circumstances. Exosomes from tumors have been found to operate as regulatory factors in cancer development, promoting cell migration and proliferation and creating a pre-metastatic niche for cells resistant to treatment[6,7].
Hepatocytes and non-parenchymal cells produce and release EVs at higher rates in response to alcohol-mediated stress[8]. The EVs produced can alter gene expression and target cell function, prolonging liver damage[8]. Bidirectional exosomal communication between organs, including the liver, brain, intestine, and lungs, can also happen in addition to intra-organ transmission mediated by EVs. The gut-liver axis maintains bilateral interactions in an environment where alcohol is present, which results in gut dysbiosis and the progression of liver impairment[9,10].
In addition to persistent alcoholism, endotoxin transfer during sepsis and brain inflammation are caused by loss of intestinal barrier integrity. Alcohol dependency and its regulatory consequences, such as altered immunological function and neurological and endocrine signaling, are hypothesized to be influenced by alcohol-induced gut dysbiosis[11,12]. Acute respiratory distress syndrome, bacterial infection, and hepatopulmonary syndrome are also linked to persistent alcohol exposure on the liver-lung axis (ARDS)[13,14].
The significance of alcohol-induced EV communication in cancer initiation and progression is unknown until now because of the high prevalence of alcohol drinking and cancer-related risk. The therapeutic significance of the function of these exosomes has been highlighted by identifying EVs as critical mediators of communication networks within and across organ systems[7,15,16]. Clinical evaluation of EVs in body fluids provides another measure for understanding exosomes as valid and valuable diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets.
Communication between malignant and non-cancerous cells, mediated by nanometric vesicles, is thought to be an essential part of tumor growth and its subsequent spread through the body. By promoting oncogene overexpression, stromal cell remodeling, immune system regulation, and angiogenesis, tumor-derived exosomes may control the course of cancer[17]. Cancer cells’ ability to grow anchorage-independently is thought to be enhanced, and their morphological changes may be modulated by the transfer of tumor-causing material through EVs[18].
Additionally, miRNA-enriched EVs have also been demonstrated in cell-cell communications and the conversion of cells into populations with enhanced motility[19]. The involvement of EV signaling during cancer progression in the alcohol environment is unknown. Recent studies have shown that the exosomal content (proteins, miRNA, non-coding RNA) can help diagnose and treat cancer[20-22]. Therefore, comprehending EVs and communication networks as biomarkers can considerably aid in developing methods to deal with the serious public health issues brought on by alcohol intake and cancer.
Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.
Peer-review model: Single blind
Specialty type: Biology
Country/Territory of origin: Spain
Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification
Grade A (Excellent): 0
Grade B (Very good): B, B, B
Grade C (Good): 0
Grade D (Fair): 0
Grade E (Poor): 0
P-Reviewer: Chu HK, China; Luo JH, China; Qin Y, China S-Editor: Chen YL L-Editor: A P-Editor: Chen YL
1. | Kuracha MR, Thomas P, Tobi M, McVicker BL. Role of cell-free network communication in alcohol-associated disorders and liver metastasis. World J Gastroenterol. 2021;27:7080-7099. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in CrossRef: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
2. | Wallace AE, Weeks WB. Substance abuse intensive outpatient treatment: does program graduation matter? J Subst Abuse Treat. 2004;27:27-30. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 26] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23] [Article Influence: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
3. | World Health Organization. Global status report on alcohol and health 2018. July 12, 2019. [cited 3 May 2022]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565639. [Cited in This Article: ] |
4. | Bagnardi V, Rota M, Botteri E, Tramacere I, Islami F, Fedirko V, Scotti L, Jenab M, Turati F, Pasquali E, Pelucchi C, Galeone C, Bellocco R, Negri E, Corrao G, Boffetta P, La Vecchia C. Alcohol consumption and site-specific cancer risk: a comprehensive dose-response meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2015;112:580-593. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 820] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 791] [Article Influence: 87.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
5. | IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Alcohol consumption and ethyl carbamate. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2010;96:3-1383. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
6. | Becker A, Thakur BK, Weiss JM, Kim HS, Peinado H, Lyden D. Extracellular Vesicles in Cancer: Cell-to-Cell Mediators of Metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2016;30:836-848. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 1100] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1358] [Article Influence: 169.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
7. | Raposo G, Stoorvogel W. Extracellular vesicles: exosomes, microvesicles, and friends. J Cell Biol. 2013;200:373-383. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 4900] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5824] [Article Influence: 529.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
8. | Shim YR, Jeong WI. Recent advances of sterile inflammation and inter-organ cross-talk in alcoholic liver disease. Exp Mol Med. 2020;52:772-780. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19] [Article Influence: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
9. | Dasarathy S, Brown JM. Alcoholic Liver Disease on the Rise: Interorgan Cross Talk Driving Liver Injury. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2017;41:880-882. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
10. | Stärkel P, Schnabl B. Bidirectional Communication between Liver and Gut during Alcoholic Liver Disease. Semin Liver Dis. 2016;36:331-339. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 63] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 68] [Article Influence: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
11. | Leclercq S, Matamoros S, Cani PD, Neyrinck AM, Jamar F, Stärkel P, Windey K, Tremaroli V, Bäckhed F, Verbeke K, de Timary P, Delzenne NM. Intestinal permeability, gut-bacterial dysbiosis, and behavioral markers of alcohol-dependence severity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:E4485-E4493. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 474] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 622] [Article Influence: 62.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
12. | Mutlu EA, Gillevet PM, Rangwala H, Sikaroodi M, Naqvi A, Engen PA, Kwasny M, Lau CK, Keshavarzian A. Colonic microbiome is altered in alcoholism. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2012;302:G966-G978. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 479] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 539] [Article Influence: 44.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
13. | Afshar M, Smith GS, Terrin ML, Barrett M, Lissauer ME, Mansoor S, Jeudy J, Netzer G. Blood alcohol content, injury severity, and adult respiratory distress syndrome. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76:1447-1455. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 21] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24] [Article Influence: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
14. | Moss M, Parsons PE, Steinberg KP, Hudson LD, Guidot DM, Burnham EL, Eaton S, Cotsonis GA. Chronic alcohol abuse is associated with an increased incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome and severity of multiple organ dysfunction in patients with septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:869-877. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 220] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 226] [Article Influence: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
15. | Mathivanan S, Ji H, Simpson RJ. Exosomes: extracellular organelles important in intercellular communication. J Proteomics. 2010;73:1907-1920. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 1718] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1875] [Article Influence: 133.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
16. | Record M, Carayon K, Poirot M, Silvente-Poirot S. Exosomes as new vesicular lipid transporters involved in cell-cell communication and various pathophysiologies. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1841:108-120. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 502] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 579] [Article Influence: 52.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
17. | Maia J, Caja S, Strano Moraes MC, Couto N, Costa-Silva B. Exosome-Based Cell-Cell Communication in the Tumor Microenvironment. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2018;6:18. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 346] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 452] [Article Influence: 75.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
18. | Quaglia F, Krishn SR, Daaboul GG, Sarker S, Pippa R, Domingo-Domenech J, Kumar G, Fortina P, McCue P, Kelly WK, Beltran H, Liu Q, Languino LR. Small extracellular vesicles modulated by αVβ3 integrin induce neuroendocrine differentiation in recipient cancer cells. J Extracell Vesicles. 2020;9:1761072. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 32] [Article Influence: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
19. | Baroni S, Romero-Cordoba S, Plantamura I, Dugo M, D'Ippolito E, Cataldo A, Cosentino G, Angeloni V, Rossini A, Daidone MG, Iorio MV. Exosome-mediated delivery of miR-9 induces cancer-associated fibroblast-like properties in human breast fibroblasts. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7:e2312. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 173] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 221] [Article Influence: 27.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
20. | Xu Z, Chen Y, Ma L, Liu J, Guo Y, Yu T, Zhang L, Zhu L, Shu Y. Role of exosomal non-coding RNAs from tumor cells and tumor-associated macrophages in the tumor microenvironment. Mol Ther. 2022;. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 40] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 120] [Article Influence: 60.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
21. | Jiang J, Li J, Zhou X, Zhao X, Huang B, Qin Y. Exosomes Regulate the Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Cancer. Front Oncol. 2022;12:864980. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20] [Article Influence: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
22. | Zhang K, Erkan EP, Jamalzadeh S, Dai J, Andersson N, Kaipio K, Lamminen T, Mansuri N, Huhtinen K, Carpén O, Hietanen S, Oikkonen J, Hynninen J, Virtanen A, Häkkinen A, Hautaniemi S, Vähärautio A. Longitudinal single-cell RNA-seq analysis reveals stress-promoted chemoresistance in metastatic ovarian cancer. Sci Adv. 2022;8:eabm1831. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 21] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 58] [Article Influence: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |