Published online Aug 14, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i30.4685
Peer-review started: May 5, 2023
First decision: July 9, 2023
Revised: July 16, 2023
Accepted: July 27, 2023
Article in press: July 27, 2023
Published online: August 14, 2023
Processing time: 97 Days and 5.7 Hours
Upper gastrointestinal neoplasia, mainly including esophageal cancer and gastric cancer, is a common cancer with high mortality. Accurate prediction of lymph node metastasis (LNM) is of great significance for guiding clinical treatment and improving the prognosis of patients. In recent years, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become increasingly used in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal diseases, but its application in the detection of LNM remains limited.
Although previous studies have reported the diagnostic value of conventional EUS for LNM in upper gastrointestinal neoplasia, the relevant research conclusions were controversial, and the research results have varied widely. Therefore, we intend to further carry out this research through meta-analysis.
This study aimed to systematically search the literature and examine the diagnostic value of conventional EUS for LNM in upper gastrointestinal neoplasia by summarizing and analyzing the data.
We conducted a comprehensive search and screening of the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases from January 1, 2000 to October 1, 2022. Then, relevant study data were extracted, and the quality of the included studies was assessed based on the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. Afterward, a meta-analysis was performed using the statistical software Stata 14.0.
A total of 2986 patients in 22 studies were included. The results showed that the pooled sensitivity, specificity and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve of conventional EUS in the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal neoplasia LNM were acceptable, which were 0.62 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50-0.73], 0.80 (95%CI: 0.73-0.86) and 0.80 (95%CI: 0.76-0.83), respectively. However, the pooled positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were relatively poor, at 3.15 (95%CI: 2.46-4.03) and 0.47 (95%CI: 0.36-0.61), respectively. The pooled diagnostic score and diagnostic odds ratio were relatively small, at 1.90 (95%CI: 1.51-2.29) and 6.67 (95%CI: 4.52-9.84), respectively.
Conventional EUS has certain clinical value and can assist in the detection of LNM in upper gastrointestinal neoplasia, but it cannot be used as a confirmatory or exclusionary test. More high-quality studies are needed to further verify the diagnostic value of EUS and determine the best diagnostic criteria.
In the future, further clinical studies should be carried out to evaluate the diagnostic value of various EUS assistive technologies for LNM in upper gastrointestinal neoplasia and to evaluate the influence of neoadjuvant therapy on the diagnostic value of EUS for LNM in upper gastrointestinal neoplasia.