Published online Mar 28, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i12.1899
Peer-review started: November 30, 2022
First decision: December 20, 2022
Revised: December 29, 2022
Accepted: March 9, 2023
Article in press: March 9, 2023
Published online: March 28, 2023
Processing time: 116 Days and 3.4 Hours
Lugol chromoendoscopy (LCE) has served as a standard screening technique in high-risk patients with esophageal cancer. Nevertheless, LCE is not suitable for the general population screening given its side effects. Linked color imaging (LCI) is a novel image-enhanced endoscopic technique that can distinguish subtle differences in mucosal color. It would be beneficial for the general population if LCE can provide similar diagnostic performance to LCI.
We compared the diagnostic performance of LCI with LCE in detecting esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and precancerous lesions. If LCI can replace LCE in detecting esophageal neoplastic lesions, it would be useful for esophageal screening in the general population.
As a novel image-enhanced endoscopic technique, LCI has been confirmed to be superior to white light imaging (WLI) in detecting neoplastic lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract. We aimed to confirm that the diagnostic performance of LCI is comparable to LCE for the surveillance of ESCC.
This was a single-center, prospective, registered clinical study. In this noninferiority study, we prospectively enrolled 543 patients who underwent WLI, LCI and LCE successively. We compared the sensitivity and specificity of LCI and LCE in the detection of esophageal neoplastic lesions. We further used L*a*b* color space to evaluate the color differences of LCI.
In total, 43 patients were analyzed. The sensitivity of LCI was similar to that of LCE, whereas the specificity of LCI was greater than that of LCE. The LCI procedure time in the esophageal examination was significantly shorter than that of LCE. However, the color difference in LCI was similar in different pathological types.
Our study showed that LCI is efficient and specific for the surveillance of ESCC without causing discomfort. In the future, LCI, as a promising screening strategy, could replace LCE in the screening of esophageal neoplastic lesions in the general population.
Because of the low detection rate of esophageal cancer, we were only able to enroll a limited number of neoplastic lesions. In the future, we need to conduct a multicenter study and collect more neoplastic lesions to further evaluate the usefulness of LCI. Further evaluation of the validity of LCI in diagnosing the depth of invasion of ESCC is also warranted.