Scientometrics
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2022; 28(38): 5648-5657
Published online Oct 14, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i38.5648
Comparison of evaluation indexes for Gastroenterology and Hepatology journals in different databases
Jia-Yuan Li, Zhi-Han Yan, Ze Xiang, Ce Gao, Jian Wu
Jia-Yuan Li, Ze Xiang, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310009, Zhejiang Province, China
Zhi-Han Yan, Department of Hepatology, Wuxi Fifth People's Hospital Affiliated to Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214005, Jiangsu Province, China
Ce Gao, Jian Wu, Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Gusu School, Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou 215008, Jiangsu Province, China
Author contributions: Wu J designed the study and revised the manuscript; Li JY and Yan ZH performed the data analysis and manuscript drafting; Xiang Z and Gao C searched the literature and collected the data; Li JY wrote the paper; Wu J reviewed the results and made critical comments on the manuscript; All authors reviewed and approved the final version; Li JY and Yan ZH contributed equally to this work.
Supported by the Youth Medical Talent of Jiangsu Province, No. QNRC2016475.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with this manuscript.
PRISMA 2009 Checklist statement: The authors have read the PRISMA 2009 Checklist, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the PRISMA 2009 Checklist.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Jian Wu, MD, PhD, Professor, Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Gusu School, Nanjing Medical University, No. 242 Guangji Road, Suzhou 215008, Jiangsu Province, China. wujianglinxing@163.com
Received: August 9, 2022
Peer-review started: August 9, 2022
First decision: August 25, 2022
Revised: September 4, 2022
Accepted: September 21, 2022
Article in press: September 21, 2022
Published online: October 14, 2022
Processing time: 63 Days and 14.9 Hours
ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS
Research background

The evaluation of journal quality is very important for researchers. Journal Impact Factor (JIF) and CiteScore (CS) are two of the most popular and authoritative journal evaluation indicators. With the ongoing scientometric research into their advantages and disadvantages, there is a consequent emergence of new journal evaluation indicators. The logical next-step is comparative judgement of the reliability and innovative novelty of such new journal evaluation indexes.

Research motivation

The recently-launched Reference Citation Analysis database of Baishideng Publishing Group is an open multidisciplinary citation analysis database founded in artificial intelligence technology. Based on this database, Journal Article Influence Index (JAII) has been proposed as a new journal evaluation indicator.

Research objectives

To compare the advantages and disadvantages of JAII with those of JIF and CS.

Research methods

For comparisons between JAII and 2021 JIF/2021 CS, we conducted statistical analyses and provided an intuitive method for visual representation of the related data.

Research results

For lower-quality journals, JAII, 2021 JIF, and 2021 CS had a good linear correlation. However, their results of assessments of higher-quality journals varied widely. These three evaluation indexes have their own advantages and disadvantages, including the avoidance of time randomness and ability for near-real time evaluation of the JAII.

Research conclusions

JAII is a comprehensive assessment tool to assess the quality and performance of journals.

Research perspectives

In the future, we hope to better explain the current existent nonlinear relationship among the three evaluation indexes, and combine a variety of journal evaluation indicators to allow for more comprehensive evaluation of journal quality by scientometric-focused and general researchers.