Published online Sep 28, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i36.5463
Peer-review started: June 9, 2020
First decision: July 29, 2020
Revised: July 30, 2020
Accepted: August 29, 2020
Article in press: August 29, 2020
Published online: September 28, 2020
Processing time: 106 Days and 20.6 Hours
There are few reports on the characteristics of major gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in patients exposed to different antithrombotics.
There are conflicting results when reporting GI bleeding causative lesions across different antithrombotics. In addition, severity and case fatality are poorly known.
The main objective was to describe the characteristics, causative lesions, management and fatalities related to major GI bleeding events for patients receiving an antithrombotic. A secondary objective was to compare the distribution of antithrombotics between upper and lower GI bleeding, and finally to compare the distribution of antithrombotics between patients with gastro-duodenal ulcer and patients with other identified causes of upper GI bleeding.
Over a three-year period (2013-2015), in two tertiary care hospitals in France, we prospectively identified adult patients admitted for major GI bleeding while receiving an antithrombotic. Patients were screened at emergency admission by computerised requests on electronic health records. All screened records were medically validated. Major bleeding was defined on pre-specified criteria. Data were collected from emergency department clinical records and hospital medical records.
We observed a high rate of identification of causative bleeding lesions. There was a higher proportion of direct oral anticoagulant use among patients with lower GI locations than among those with upper GI lesion locations. Dual antiplatelet regimen was more frequently encountered among patients with gastro-duodenal ulcers. Our data did not support differences in management and outcomes across the various antithrombotics. In-hospital mortality was low.
Our results suggest a different pattern of antithrombotic exposure between GI lesion locations.
Future research could assess potential difference between direct oral anticoagulants.