Published online Sep 15, 2003. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i9.2092
Revised: January 23, 2003
Accepted: March 10, 2003
Published online: September 15, 2003
AIM: Our research attempted to evaluate the overall functional reserve of cirrhotic liver by combination of hepatic functional blood flow, liver volume, and Child-Pugh’s classification, and to discuss its value of clinical application.
METHODS: Ninety two patients with portal hypertension due to hepatic cirrhosis were investigated. All had a history of haematemesis and hematochezia, esophageal and gastric fundus varices, splenomegaly and hypersplenia. A 2-year follow-up was routinely performed and no one was lost. Twenty two healthy volunteers were used as control group. Blood and urine samples were collected 4 times before and after intravenous D-sorbitol infusion. The hepatic clearance (CLH) of D-sorbitol was then calculated according to enzymatic spectrophotometric method while the total blood flow (QTOTAL) and intrahepatic shunt (RINS) were detected by multicolor Doppler ultrasound, and the liver volume was measured by spiral CT. Data were estimated by t-test, variance calculation and chi-squared test. The relationships between all these parameters and different groups were investigated according to Child-Pugh classification and postoperative complications respectively.
RESULTS: Steady blood concentration was achieved 120 mins after D-sorbitol intravenous infusion, which was (0.358 ± 0.064) mmol·L-1 in cirrhotic group and (0.189 ± 0.05) mmol·L-1 in control group (P < 0.01). CLH = (812.7 ± 112.4) mL·min-1, QTOTAL = (1280.6 ± 131.4) mL·min-1, and RINS = (36.54 ± 10.65)% in cirrhotic group and CLH = (1248.3 ± 210.5) mL·min-1, QTOTAL = (1362.4 ± 126.9) mL·min-1, and RINS = (8.37 ± 3.32)% in control group (P < 0.01). The liver volume of cirrhotic group was 1057 ± 249 cm3, 851 ± 148 cm3 and 663 ± 77 cm3 in Child A, B and C group respectively with significant difference (P < 0.001). The average volume of cirrhotic liver in Child B, C group was significantly reduced in comparison with that in control group (P < 0.001). The patient, whose liver volume decreased by 40% with the CLH below 600 mL·min-1, would have a higher incidence of postoperative complications. There was no strict correspondent relationship between CLH, liver volume and Child-Pugh’s classification.
CONCLUSION: The hepatic clearance of D-sorbitol, CT measured liver volume can be reliably used for the evaluation of hepatic functional blood flow and liver metabolic volume. Combined with the Child-Pugh’s classification, it could be very useful for further understanding the liver functional reserve, therefore help determine reasonable therapeutic plan, choose surgical procedures and operating time.