Published online Jul 28, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i28.4697
Peer-review started: May 7, 2021
First decision: June 6, 2021
Revised: June 8, 2021
Accepted: July 7, 2021
Article in press: July 7, 2021
Published online: July 28, 2021
Processing time: 79 Days and 21.4 Hours
There is little data available on the role of new anti-reflux plastic stents (ARPSs).
To compare the use of ARPSs with that of traditional plastic stents (TPSs) for patients with biliary strictures.
Consecutive patients with biliary strictures who underwent first endoscopic biliary stenting between February 2016 and May 2019 were included. The onset of stent-related cholangitis, stent patency, clinical success, and other adverse events were evaluated.
Sixty-seven patients in the ARPS group and 66 patients in the TPS group were included in the final analyses. Fewer patients experienced stent-related cholangitis in the ARPS group than that in the TPS group (8 patients vs 18 patients; P = 0.030). The median time till the onset of first stent-related cholangitis was later in the ARPS group than that in the TPS group (128.5 d vs 76 d; P = 0.039). The cumulative median stent patency in the ARPS group was 185 d, which was significantly longer than that in the TPS group (133 d; P = 0.001). The clinical success rates and other adverse events did not significantly differ between both groups.
Placement of new ARPS might be a safe and effective optional therapeutic strategy to reduce the risk of stent-related cholangitis and prolong stent patency.
Core Tip: This is a retrospective study to compare the use of new anti-reflux plastic stents (ARPSs) with that of traditional plastic stents (TPSs) for patients with biliary strictures. Fewer patients experienced stent-related cholangitis in the ARPS group than in the TPS group (8 vs 18 patients; P = 0.030). The cumulative median stent patency in the ARPS group was 185 d, which was significantly longer than that in the TPS group (133 d).