Published online Oct 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i37.10604
Peer-review started: April 22, 2015
First decision: June 2, 2015
Revised: June 17, 2015
Accepted: September 2, 2015
Article in press: September 2, 2015
Published online: October 7, 2015
Processing time: 160 Days and 2.6 Hours
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the fifth most common cancer in the world, shows increasing incidence worldwide. Curative treatments such as hepatectomy, liver transplantation, and radiofrequency ablation are applied in only 30%-60% of cases. Most remaining patients receive transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Patients with intermediate-stage HCCs are regarded as good candidates for TACE. However, the intermediate stage includes non-homogeneous patients. Some movements are underway to stratify patients using prognostic factors to identify patient groups exhibiting greater benefit from TACE than other patient groups. This review describes two substaging systems that subclassify intermediate-stage HCCs and discusses the importance of dividing intermediate-stage patients.
Core tip: There are movements to divide the intermediate stage of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) because of the diversity of intermediate-stage patients. This review describes two substaging systems (Bolondi substaging system and substaging system proposed by Japanese Society of Transcatheter Hepatic Arterial Embolization) that subclassify intermediate-stage HCCs and discusses the importance of dividing intermediate-stage patients.