Published online Jun 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i21.6608
Revised: February 20, 2014
Accepted: March 12, 2014
Published online: June 7, 2014
Processing time: 213 Days and 16.8 Hours
AIM: To evaluate the value of positron emission tomography (PET)/computerized tomography (CT) in surveillance of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with different carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) concentrations.
METHODS: One hundred and six postoperative CRC patients who had suspected recurrence or metastasis and received fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT within one week were included in this study. The final diagnosis was confirmed by histological examination or clinical follow-up over at least six months.
RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FDG PET/CT were 95.2%, 82.6%, and 92.5%, and 94.8%, 81.4% and 92.8%, respectively, in the case- and lesion-based analyses. The sensitivity and accuracy of FDG PET/CT significantly differed from CT in both analyses (χ2 = 8.186, P = 0.004; χ2 =6.201, P = 0.013; χ2 =13.445, P = 0.000; χ2 =11.194, P = 0.001). In the lesion-based analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FDG PET/CT in the abnormal CEA group were 97.8%, 82.6%, and 95.6%, compared with 81.3%, 80%, and 80.6% for patients with normal CEA levels. In case-based analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FDG PET/CT were 97.2%, 77.8%, and 95% in abnormal CEA group. Only in lesion-based analysis, the sensitivity and accuracy of FDG PET/CT in the abnormal CEA group were significantly superior to those in the normal CEA group (χ2 =6.432, P = 0.011; χ2 =7.837, P = 0.005). FDG PET/CT changed the management in 45.8% of patients with positive scans.
CONCLUSION: FDG PET/CT showed superior diagnostic value and is an advisable option in surveillance of postoperative CRC patients with a vague diagnosis.
Core tip: In this paper, fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computerized tomography (CT) showed an excellent diagnostic performance and its sensitivity and accuracy were significantly superior to those of CT. FDG PET/CT changed the management in some metastatic patients who might obtain the chance for a second remission. The study also showed that FDG PET/CT was effective similarly in the patients with normal and abnormal carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels but had a tendency to increase with the CEA level. FDG PET/CT was an advisable option for surveillance of postoperative colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with a vague diagnosis and should be recommended in surveillance of post-operative CRC patients even with normal CEA.