Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 7, 2013; 19(13): 2080-2086
Published online Apr 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i13.2080
Synchronous vs sequential laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystocholedocholithiasis
Yan-Bing Ding, Bin Deng, Xin-Nong Liu, Jian Wu, Wei-Ming Xiao, Yuan-Zhi Wang, Jian-Ming Ma, Qiang Li, Ze-Sheng Ju
Yan-Bing Ding, Bin Deng, Jian Wu, Wei-Ming Xiao, Yuan-Zhi Wang, Department of Gastroenterology, Yangzhou No. 1 People’s Hospital, The Second Clinical School of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225000, Jiangsu Province, China
Xin-Nong Liu, Jian-Ming Ma, Qiang Li, Ze-Sheng Ju, Department of Surgery, Yangzhou No. 1 People’s Hospital, The Second Clinical School of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225000, Jiangsu Province, China
Author contributions: Ding YB and Deng B contributed equally to this work; Liu XN, Ding YB and Deng B designed the research methods; Wu J, Wang YZ, Ma JM, Li Q and Ju ZS performed the research; Ding YB, Deng B, and Xiao WM analyzed the data; and Liu XN, Ding YB and Deng B wrote the paper.
Correspondence to: Xin-Nong Liu, PhD, Department of Surgery, Yangzhou No. 1 People’s Hospital, The Second Clinical School of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225000, Jiangsu Province, China. ybding66@163.com
Telephone: +86-514-82981199 Fax: +86-514-82981199
Received: November 26, 2012
Revised: January 4, 2013
Accepted: January 11, 2013
Published online: April 7, 2013
Processing time: 134 Days and 1.1 Hours
Abstract

AIM: To compare synchronous laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) and sequential LC combined with EST for treating cholecystocholedocholithiasis.

METHODS: A total of 150 patients were included and retrospectively studied. Among these, 70 were selected for the synchronous operation, in which the scheme was endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography combined with EST during LC. The other 80 patients were selected for the sequential operation, in which the scheme involved first cutting the papillary muscle under endoscopy and then performing LC. The indexes in the two groups, including the operation time, the success rate, the incidence of complications, and the length of the hospital stay, were observed.

RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of the numbers of patients, sex distribution, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, serum bilirubin, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, mean diameter of common bile duct stones, and previous medical and surgical history (P = 0.54, P = 0.18, P = 0.52, P = 0.22, P = 0.32, P = 0.42, P = 0.68, P = 0.70, P = 0.47 and P = 0.57). There was no significant difference in the surgical operation time between the two groups (112.1 ± 30.8 min vs 104.9 ± 18.2 min). Compared with the sequential operation group, the incidence of pancreatitis was lower (1.4% vs 6.3%), the incidence of hyperamylasemia (1.4% vs 10.0%, P < 0.05) was significantly reduced, and the length of the hospital stay was significantly shortened in the synchronous operation group (3 d vs 4.5 d, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: For treatment of cholecystocholedocholithiasis, synchronous LC combined with EST reduces incidence of complications, decreases length of hospital stay, simplifies the surgical procedure, and reduces operation time.

Keywords: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Endoscopic sphincterotomy; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Cholecystolithiasis; Choledocholithiasis