Brief Article
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2012; 18(6): 546-550
Published online Feb 14, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i6.546
Ambispective comparative study of two surgical strategies for liver hydatidosis
Jose M Ramia, Francisco Ruiz-Gomez, Roberto De la Plaza, Pilar Veguillas, Jose Quiñones, Jorge García-Parreño
Jose M Ramia, Francisco Ruiz-Gomez, Roberto De la Plaza, Pilar Veguillas, Jose Quiñones, Jorge García-Parreño, Department of Surgery, Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Guadalajara University Hospital, Guadalajara 19002, Spain
Author contributions: Ramia JM, Ruiz F, De la Plaza R, Veguillas P, Quiñones J and Garcia-Parreño J designed research; Ramia JM, Ruiz F and De la Plaza R performed research; Ramia JM; De la Plaza R, Quiñones J and Veguillas P analyzed data; and Ramia JM wrote the paper.
Correspondence to: Jose M Ramia, MD, PhD, Department of Surgery, Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Guadalajara University Hospital, Guadalajara 19002, Spain. jose_ramia@hotmail.com
Telephone: +34-61-6292056 Fax: +439-49-209216
Received: March 23, 2011
Revised: November 12, 2011
Accepted: November 19, 2011
Published online: February 14, 2012
Abstract

AIM: To investigate the morbidity, mortality, recurrence and technical aspects of two distinct surgical strategies that were implemented in successive periods.

METHODS: Ninty-two patients with 113 cysts underwent surgical procedures. The study was divided into 2 periods. Data from first period (P1) were compiled retrospectively. The surgical strategy was conservative surgery. The second period (P2) included a prospective study conducted according to a protocol following the criterion that radical procedures should be performed whenever it is technically feasible.

RESULTS: Patients of both periods showed no statistically significant differences in age, gender, cyst location or mortality. Among the P2 group, patients exhibited more preoperative jaundice, and cyst size was smaller (P < 0.05). Changes in surgical strategy increased the rate of radical surgery, decreases morbidity and in-hospital stay (P < 0.001). A negative result in P2 was the death of two old patients (4.8%) who had undergone conservative treatments. The rate of radical surgery in P2 was around 75%.

CONCLUSION: Radical surgery should be the technique of choice whenever it is feasible, because it diminishes morbidity and in-hospital stay. Conservative surgery must be employed only in selected cases.

Keywords: Hydatid disease, Surgery, Morbidity, Liver