Clinical Research
Copyright ©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 21, 2008; 14(15): 2364-2369
Published online Apr 21, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.2364
Efficacy, risk factors and complications of endoscopic polypectomy: Ten year experience at a single center
Pierluigi Consolo, Carmelo Luigiano, Giuseppe Strangio, Maria Grazia Scaffidi, Giuseppa Giacobbe, Giovanna Di Giuseppe, Agata Zirilli, Luigi Familiari
Pierluigi Consolo, Carmelo Luigiano, Giuseppe Strangio, Maria Grazia Scaffidi, Giuseppa Giacobbe, Giovanna Di Giuseppe, Luigi Familiari, Department of Medicine and Pharmacology University Hospital “G. Martino”, Via Consolare Valeria, Messina 98100, Italy
Agata Zirilli, Department of Statistics, University of Messina, Messina 98100, Italy
Author contributions: Consolo P and Familiari L contributed equally to this work; Consolo P, Luigiano C, Strangio G, Scaffidi MG and Familiari L designed research; Luigiano C, Giacobbe G and Di Giuseppe G performed research; Zirilli A analyzed data; Luigiano C and Scaffidi M wrote the paper.
Correspondence to: Carmelo Luigiano, MD, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Department of Medicine and Pharmacology, University Hospital “G. Martino”, Via Consolare Valeria, Messina 98100, Italy. carmeluigiano@libero.it
Telephone: +39-90-2212312
Fax: +39-90-693917
Received: December 14, 2007
Revised: March 10, 2008
Published online: April 21, 2008
Abstract

AIM: To examine the efficacy and complications of colonoscopic resection of colorectal polypoid lesions.

METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1354 polypectomies performed on 1038 patients over a ten-year period. One hundred and sixty of these were performed for large polyps, those measuring ≥ 20 mm. Size, shape, location, histology, the technique of polypectomy used, complications, drugs assumption and associated intestinal or extra intestinal diseases were analyzed. For statistical analysis, the Pearson χ2 test, NPC test and a Binary Logistic Regression were used.

RESULTS: The mean patient age was 65.9 ± 12.4 years, with 671 men and 367 women. The mean size of polyps removed was 9.45 ± 9.56 mm while the size of large polyps was 31.5 ± 10.8 mm. There were 388 pedunculated and 966 sessile polyps and the most common location was the sigmoid colon (41.3%). The most frequent histology was tubular adenoma (55.9%) while for the large polyps was villous (92/160 -57.5%). Coexistent malignancy was observed in 28 polyps (2.1%) and of these, 20 were large polyps. There were 17 procedural bleeding (1.3%) and one perforation. The statistical analysis showed that cancer is correlated to polyp size (P < 0.0001); sessile shape (P < 0.0001) and bleeding are correlated to cardiac disease (P = 0.034), tubular adenoma (P = 0.016) and polyp size.

CONCLUSION: The endoscopic resection is a simple and safe procedure for removing colon rectal neoplastic lesions and should be considered the treatment of choice for large colorectal polyps. The polyp size is an important risk factor for malignancy and for bleeding.

Keywords: Colonoscopy; Polypectomy; Large polyps; Colorectal neoplastic lesions; Endoscopic resection