Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Meta-Anal. Dec 18, 2024; 12(4): 97779
Published online Dec 18, 2024. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v12.i4.97779
Published online Dec 18, 2024. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v12.i4.97779
Table 1 Glycated hemoglobin among patients with diabetes distress and control subjects, mean ± SD
Ref. | Country | Study type | Diabetes distress HbA1c | Total number | Controls HbA1c | Total number | Results |
Al-Ozairi et al[21] | Kuwait | Cross-sectional | 9.2 ± 3.5 | 69 | 8.4 ± 2.49 | 396 | Sig. |
Alzughbi et al[22] | Saudi Arabia | Cross-sectional | 9.4 ± 1.7 | 67 | 8.7 ± 1.7 | 233 | Sig. |
Ascher-Svanum et al[23] | Five European countries | Prospective | 9.91 ± 2.09 | 289 | 9.39 ± 1.97 | 677 | Sig. |
Asuzu et al[24] | United States | Cross-sectional | 7.9 ± 1.8 | 615 | 8.66 ± 1.8 | 615 | Not sig. |
Chen et al[25] | Taiwan | Cross-sectional | 10.98 + 7.56 | 255 | 10.39 + 2.09 | 255 | Not sig. |
Cummings et al[26] | United States | Prospective | 9.4 ± 0.3 | 45 | 8.8 ± 0.2 | 84 | Sig. |
Davis et al[27] | Australia | Prospective | 6.87 ± 0.7 | 435 | 7.6 ± 0.8 | 93 | Sig. |
Guo et al[28] | Singapore | Cross-sectional | 9.7 ± 1.4 | 62 | 9.4 ± 1.5 | 294 | Not sig. |
Hayashino et al[29] | Japan | Retrospective | 7.9 ± 1.4 | 371 | 7.5 ± 1.1 | 2747 | Not sig. |
Ismail et al[30] | United Kingdom | Prospective | 7.20 ± 1.61 | 111 | 6.98 ± 1.40 | 1540 | Sig. |
Khan and Choudhary[31] | United Kingdom | Cross-sectional | 8.7 ± 1.8 | 24 | 7.7 ± 0.9 | 59 | Sig. |
Matsuba et al[32] | Three Asian countries | Cross-sectional | 8.68 ± 1.63 | 671 | 7.77 ± 1.63 | 671 | Sig. |
Nguyen et al[33] | Vietnam | Cross-sectional | 7.7 ± 1.4 | 14 | 7.1 ± 1.5 | 98 | Sig. |
Pandit et al[12] | United States | Prospective | 9.3 ± 2.0 | 94 | 7.8 ± 1.7 | 391 | Sig. |
Park et al[34] | Korea | Retrospective | 7.27 ± 0.7 | 589 | 6.97 ± 0.6 | 1293 | Sig. |
Schmitt et al[35] | Germany | Cross-sectional | 8.8 ± 1.5 | 42 | 8.6 ± 1.7 | 221 | Not sig. |
Sidhu and Tang[36] | Canada | Cross-sectional | 7.0 ± 0.9 | 20 | 7.0 ± 1.1 | 19 | Not sig. |
Totesora et al[37] | Philippines | Cross-sectional | 9.0 ± 2.5 | 40 | 7.7 ± 1.7 | 47 | Sig. |
Table 2 Diabetes distress effects on glycemic control
Ref. | Country | Study type | Diabetes distress glycemic control | Total number | Controls, glycemic control | Total number | Results |
Bhaskara et al[38] | Indonesia | Cross-sectional | 53 | 75 | 19 | 49 | Sig. |
Huynh et al[39] | Vietnam | Cross-sectional | 118 | 152 | 236 | 365 | Sig. |
Lim et al[40] | Singapore | Cross-sectional | 58 | 146 | 91 | 379 | Sig. |
Sasi et al[41] | India | Cross-sectional | 144 | 270 | 126 | 270 | Sig. |
Totesora et al[37] | Philippines | Cross-sectional | 28 | 40 | 27 | 47 | Sig. |
Table 3 Diabetes distress and depression effects on glycemic control, mean ± SD
Ref. | Country | Study type | Diabetes distress HbA1c | Total number | Depression HbA1c | Total number | Results |
Al-Ozairi et al[21] | Kuwait | Cross-sectional | 9.2 ± 3.5 | 69 | 8.7 ± 2 | 44 | Sig. |
Ascher-Svanum et al[23] | United States | Prospective | 9.91 ± 2.09 | 289 | 9.62 ± 2.02 | 485 | Not sig. |
Davis et al[27] | Australia | Prospective | 6.87 ± 0.7 | 435 | 7.5 ± 1.28 | 50 | Sig. |
Hayashino et al[29] | Japan | Retrospective | 7.9 ± 1.4 | 371 | 7.6 ± 1.2 | 862 | Sig. |
Ismail et al[30] | United Kingdom | Prospective | 7.20 ± 1.61 | 111 | 7.11 ± 1.37 | 232 | Not sig. |
Nanayakkara et al[13] | Australia | Retrospective | 9.3 ± 2.1 | 177 | 8.85 ± 2.0 | 698 | Sig. |
Sidhu and Tang[36] | Canada | Cross-sectional | 7.0 ± 0.9 | 21 | 7.0 ± 0.9 | 6 | Not sig. |
Table 4 The risk of bias assessment and questionnaires used to assess diabetes distress and depression among patients with diabetes
Ref. | Questionnaires used | Selection bias | Comparability bias | Outcome | Total score |
Al-Ozairi et al[21] | The PAID, patient health questionnaire-9 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 8 |
Alzughbi et al[22] | The 17-item diabetes distress scale and the patient health questionnaire-9 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 8 |
Ascher-Svanum et al[23] | Severity of depressed/anxious mood (EuroQol-5D item) and diabetes-related distress (psychological distress domain of the diabetes health profile-18) | 4 | 2 | 3 | 9 |
Asuzu et al[24] | The 17-item diabetes distress scale, and patient health questionnaire | 5 | 2 | 2 | 9 |
Chen et al[25] | The short-form problem areas in diabetes scale, psychological factors questionnaire | 4 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
Cummings et al[26] | The 17-item diabetes distress scale | 4 | 2 | 3 | 9 |
Davis et al[27] | The PAID, patient health questionnaire-9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 9 |
Guo et al[28] | The PAID, patient health questionnaire-9 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 |
Hayashino et al[29] | The PAID questionnaire, center for epidemiological studies-depression | 4 | 2 | 3 | 9 |
Ismail et al[30] | The patient health questionnaire-9 and PAID scores | 4 | 2 | 3 | 9 |
Khan and Choudhary[31] | Diabetes distress scale-2 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 8 |
Matsuba et al[32] | Diabetes distress scale-25-item | 5 | 1 | 2 | 8 |
Nguyen et al[33] | The 17-item diabetes distress scale | 5 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
Pandit et al[12] | The 17-item diabetes distress scale | 5 | 2 | 2 | 9 |
Park et al[34] | The problem areas in diabetes scale | 5 | 1 | 2 | 8 |
Schmitt et al[35] | Center for epidemiologic studies depression scale, diabetes distress scale | 5 | 1 | 2 | 8 |
Sidhu and Tang[36] | Diabetes distress scale, patient health questionnaire-9 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 8 |
Totesora et al[37] | PAID-20 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 8 |
Bhaskara et al[38] | Diabetes distress scale | 5 | 1 | 2 | 8 |
Huynh et al[39] | Diabetes distress scale | 5 | 1 | 2 | 8 |
Lim et al[40] | The problem area in diabetes | ||||
Sasi et al[41] | Diabetes distress scale | 5 | 1 | 2 | 8 |
- Citation: Mirghani HO. Diabetes distress, the mediator of the poor glycemic control and depression: A meta-analysis. World J Meta-Anal 2024; 12(4): 97779
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v12/i4/97779.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v12.i4.97779