Published online Jun 26, 2015. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v3.i3.163
Peer-review started: October 21, 2014
First decision: December 26, 2014
Revised: April 13, 2015
Accepted: May 5, 2015
Article in press: May 6, 2015
Published online: June 26, 2015
Processing time: 253 Days and 18.7 Hours
AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) for the treatment of hematologic malignant diseases.
METHODS: We searched the Cochrane CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, AMED, CNKI, Wanfang Platform; China Sinomed and the clinical trial registry web sites and Googlescholar electronically up to June 19th, 2014 and hand searched related publications. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) researching on whether TCM as the adjuvant treatment improved the effect for hematologic malignant diseases were included. Two reviewers extracted data and evaluated the studies independently. Pooled risk ratios (RR) were calculated as outcome measures. Our primary outcomes were the overall response (OR) rate.
RESULTS: We retrieved 13143 references and included 11 RCTs involved 891 participants after screening. Because the non-significant heterogeneity we used the fixed effect model to combine data and TCM had a significantly higher OR and CR (complete response) rates than the control [RR = 1.17, 95%CI: (1.10, 1.25), P < 0.00001; RR = 1.24, 95%CI: (1.11, 1.37), P < 0.0001, respectively]. Only three studies included in the survival rate analysis. We combined them with random effects model and there was no significant difference between the TCM and control arms. Because of the low heterogeneity we used the fixed effect model to combine the non-hematologic adverse effects (AEs) data. Our results showed that TCM significantly decreased non-hematologic AEs rates we researched, the gastrointestinal reaction [RR = 0.50, 95%CI: (0.37, 0.68), P < 0.0001], liver and/or kidney injury [RR = 0.37, 95%CI: (0.26, 0.53), P < 0.00001] and heart injury [RR = 0.24, 95%CI: (0.09, 0.68), P = 0.007]. Additionally, TCM had a trend to decrease the infection rate [RR = 0.16, (0.02, 1.12), P = 0.07], but not statistically significantly.
CONCLUSION: TCM increases OR and CR rates for hematologic malignances and reduces treatment associated serious non-hematologic AEs. Therefore, TCM should be included in the treatment of hematologic malignances.
Core tip: We pooled all the studies complied to our inclusion criteria that were retrieved by extensively searching the related databases, journals and websites. Our result suggested that adding traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) increased overall response and complete response rates for malignant hematologic diseases treatment. Although it was based on the evidence of low level of GRADE quality, our result demonstrated that TCM reduced treatment associated serious non-hematologic adverse effects (AEs). Furthermore, considering the rare AEs and drugs interactions, TCM should be included in the hematologic malignances treatment, at least for adult acute leukemia.