1
|
Weng ZH, Hu HK, Zhou ZS, Huang LS, Chen BB, Lin JR. Bibliometric analysis of preoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: evolution and future. Front Med (Lausanne) 2025; 12:1518640. [PMID: 40034388 PMCID: PMC11872925 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1518640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2024] [Accepted: 01/27/2025] [Indexed: 03/05/2025] Open
Abstract
Background Preoperative radiotherapy of rectal cancer has been a hot topic of research in recent years with the introduction of total neoadjuvant therapies and immunotherapeutic agents. We utilized bibliometrics and visualization analysis to examine studies in this field, aiming to identify current hotspots and research trends. Method We searched the Web of Science database for all publications related to preoperative radiotherapy of rectal cancer in the past 10 years. Using bibliometric analysis software, such as VOSviewer, CiteSpace and R-studio, we extracted and analyzed the data, summarizing the publication output of countries, institutions, authors, and journals in this field, and analyzing their relationships. We also summarized the keywords, burst words, and most cited articles, and analyzed the relationships among them. Results We found 794 publications in the field, sourced from 217 journals or books, involving 5,805 authors from various organizations and countries. Through bibliometric analysis, we observed a growing trend in the number of publications in preoperative radiotherapy of rectal cancer over the past 10 years. China, United States and Italy were the top countries in terms of publication output. Sun Yat-sen University, Fujian University, and Fudan University were the top three medical centers in terms of publication output, while Leiden University from Netherlands led globally in terms of citation impact. Professor Zhen Zhang, Sanjun Cai, and Ji Zhu were the top three authors with the highest publication output. The most highly cited journals in this field includes "The Lancet Oncology," "J Clinical Oncology," and "Annals of Oncology." Journals such as "Radiotherapy and Oncology," "Frontiers in Oncology," and "BMC Cancer" have the highest number of articles published. Based on the analysis of keywords and burst words, we found that "preoperative chemoradiation" and "oral capecitabine" were the research hotspots before 2016, while the focus shifted to "short-course radiotherapy" and "long-term outcomes" after 2017. Currently, the most frequently cited publications mainly summarize multicenter clinical studies and total neoadjuvant treatment models and immunotherapy. Conclusion Research on preoperative radiotherapy of rectal cancer is increasing year by year, and attracting attention from high-cited journals such as "The Lancet Oncology," "JCO," and "Annals of Oncology." Based on current data, the total neoadjuvant treatment models and radiation combined with immunotherapy are the research trends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen-Hong Weng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Hao-Kai Hu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zi-Shan Zhou
- Department of Health Management Clinic, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Li-Sheng Huang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Bin-Bin Chen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jia-Rui Lin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu X, Chen XL, Yuan Y, Pu H, Li H. Dual-energy CT quantitative parameters for prediction of prognosis in patients with resectable rectal cancer. Eur Radiol 2025:10.1007/s00330-025-11398-3. [PMID: 39921716 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-025-11398-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2024] [Revised: 12/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/05/2025] [Indexed: 02/10/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether quantitative parameters derived from dual-energy CT (DECT) could predict prognosis in patients with resectable rectal cancer (RC). MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred and thirty-four patients (recurrence/distant metastasis group, n = 36; non-metastasis/non-recurrence group, n = 98) with RC who underwent radical resection and DECT were retrospectively included. DECT quantitative parameters, including iodine concentration (IC), normalized iodine concentration (NIC), electron density (Rho), effective atomic number (Zeff), dual-energy index (DEI), the slope of the spectral Hounsfield unit curve (λHU) on arterial and venous phase images. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were employed to identify independent risk factors of prognosis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess the performance. Disease-free survival (DFS) curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Patients in the metastasis/recurrence group had higher Rho in arterial phase (A-Rho), NIC in venous phase (V-NIC), Rho in venous phase (V-Rho), Zeff in venous phase (V-Zeff), λHU in venous phase (V-λHU), pT stage, pN stage, serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen-199 levels and more frequent in extramural venous invasion than those in non-metastasis/non-recurrence group (all p < 0.05). V-NIC, V-λHU, and CEA were independent risk factors of recurrence/distant metastasis (all p < 0.05). The AUC of combined indicator integrating three independent risk factors achieved the best diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.900). In stratified survival analysis, patients with high V-NIC, V-λHU, and CEA had lower 3-year DFS than those with low V-NIC, V-λHU, and CEA. CONCLUSION Combining V-NIC, V-λHU, and CEA could be used to noninvasively predict prognosis in resectable RC. KEY POINTS Question TNM staging fails to accurately prognosticate; can quantitative parameters derived from dual-energy CT predict prognosis in patients with resectable rectal cancer? Findings Normalized iodine concentration (V-NIC) and the slope of the spectral Hounsfield unit curve in venous phase (V-λHU), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) are independent risk factors for recurrence/metastasis. Clinical relevance The combined indicator integrating V-NIC, V-λHU, and CEA could predict 3-year disease-free survival in patients with resectable rectal cancer and could aid in postoperative survival risk stratification to guide personalized treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xia Liu
- Department of Radiology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiao-Li Chen
- Department of Radiology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Medical School, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Yi Yuan
- Department of Radiology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Hong Pu
- Department of Radiology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Hang Li
- Department of Radiology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Azimi A, Tabatabaei FS, Kolahdouzan K, Rashidian H, Nourbakhsh F, Parizi MA, Darzikolaee NM, Bayani R, Salarvand S, Sharifian A, Bagheri F, Rezaei S, Nabian N, Nazari R, Mohammadi N, Babaei M, Lashkari M, Farhan F, Aghili M, Couñago F, Gambacorta MA, Ghalehtaki R. Short-term and long-term oncological outcomes of chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer patients with or without oxaliplatin: a propensity score-matched retrospective analysis. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:172. [PMID: 39627803 PMCID: PMC11616289 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02562-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2024] [Accepted: 11/12/2024] [Indexed: 12/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Current approaches for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) typically recommend neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) with 5-fluorouracil (5FU) or its oral analogs followed by surgery as the standard of care. However, the question of whether intensifying concurrent chemotherapy by adding oxaliplatin to the 5FU-based backbone can yield better outcomes remains unresolved. This study aimed to investigate the benefits of incorporating oxaliplatin into fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) to increase locoregional control and survival. METHODS Among 290 patients with LARC admitted to the Iran Cancer Institute's radiation oncology department between January 2008 and December 2019, 29 received CAPEOX (capecitabine 625 mg/m²/bid on RT days and weekly oxaliplatin 50 mg/m²), whereas 293 received capecitabine (825 mg/m² twice daily or rarely 5FU in the first 4 days and last week of radiotherapy (RT)). Variables potentially affecting treatment outcomes were used for propensity score matching. Kaplan‒Meier and log-rank tests were employed for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) analyses and were adjusted with propensity score matching. RESULTS Data from 29 patients who received CAPEOX and 216 patients who received capecitabine were analyzed after propensity score matching without replacement. After propensity score matching, in the multivariate analysis, CAPEOX significantly increased the likelihood of achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR) by 4.38 times (CI: 1.90-10.08, p value < 0.001). However, CAPEOX did not demonstrate any statistically significant predictive value for DFS (P = 0.500) or OS (P = 0.449). CONCLUSION The addition of oxaliplatin resulted in a significantly higher rate of pCR without any translation into long-term survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amirali Azimi
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Sadat Tabatabaei
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Kasra Kolahdouzan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, IKHC, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hamideh Rashidian
- Cancer Research Center, Cancer Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Forouzan Nourbakhsh
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Maryam Abedini Parizi
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Nima Mousavi Darzikolaee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, IKHC, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Reyhaneh Bayani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, IKHC, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Samaneh Salarvand
- Department of Anatomical and Clinical Pathology, School of Medicine, IKHC, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Azadeh Sharifian
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Farzaneh Bagheri
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Saeed Rezaei
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Naeim Nabian
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Reza Nazari
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Negin Mohammadi
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Babaei
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Marzieh Lashkari
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Farshid Farhan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, IKHC, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahdi Aghili
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas Madrid La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital Foundation IRCCS, 00168, Roma, Italy
| | - Reza Ghalehtaki
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, IKHC, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Radiation Oncology Ward, Cancer Institute, IKHC, Qarib Street, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xiao WW, Chen G, Gao YH, Lin JZ, Wu XJ, Luo HL, Lu ZH, Wang QX, Sun R, Cai PQ, Zhu CM, Liu M, Li JB, Wang YR, Jin Y, Wang F, Luo HT, Li CL, Pan ZZ, Xu RH. Effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with or without PD-1 antibody sintilimab in pMMR locally advanced rectal cancer: A randomized clinical trial. Cancer Cell 2024; 42:1570-1581.e4. [PMID: 39094560 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2024.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) was the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) proteins. In this randomized phase 2 trial (ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT04304209), 134 pMMR LARC patients were randomly (1:1) assigned to receive NACRT or NACRT and the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody sintilimab. As the primary endpoint, the total complete response (CR) rate is 26.9% (18/67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 16.0%-37.8%) and 44.8% (30/67, 95% CI 32.6%-57.0%) in the control and experimental arm, respectively, with significant difference (p = 0.031 for chi-squared test). Response ratio is 1.667 (95% CI 1.035-2.683). Immunohistochemistry shows PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score is associated with the synergistic effect. The safety profile is similar between the arms. Adding the PD-1 antibody sintilimab to NACRT significantly increases the CR rate in pMMR LARC, with a manageable safety profile. PD-L1 positivity may help identify patients who might benefit most from the combination therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Wei Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, The State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China; United Laboratory of Frontier Radiotherapy Technology of Sun Yat-sen University & Chinese Academy of Sciences Ion Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Guangzhou, China
| | - Gong Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, The State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuan-Hong Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, The State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun-Zhong Lin
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, The State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Jun Wu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, The State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hui-Long Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, The State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhen-Hai Lu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, The State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qiao-Xuan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, The State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rui Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, The State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China
| | - Pei-Qiang Cai
- Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, The State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chong-Mei Zhu
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, The State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China
| | - Min Liu
- Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, The State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ji-Bin Li
- Department of Statistics, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, The State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yi-Rui Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, The State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ying Jin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, The State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Feng Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, The State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hai-Tao Luo
- Shenzhen Engineering Center for Translational Medicine of Precision Cancer Immunodiagnosis and Therapy, YuceBio Technology Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, China
| | - Cai-Ling Li
- Shenzhen Engineering Center for Translational Medicine of Precision Cancer Immunodiagnosis and Therapy, YuceBio Technology Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, China
| | - Zhi-Zhong Pan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, The State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rui-Hua Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, The State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nazari R, Piozzi GN, Ghalehtaki R, Ahmadi-Tafti SM, Behboudi B, Mousavi Darzikolaee N, Aghili M, Gambacorta MA. Role of Oxaliplatin in the Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: a Review of Evidence. Clin Med Insights Oncol 2024; 18:11795549241236409. [PMID: 38510317 PMCID: PMC10952988 DOI: 10.1177/11795549241236409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
The treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is a challenging situation for radiation oncologists and colorectal surgeons. Most current approaches recommend neoadjuvant fluorouracil or capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery as a standard of care. Intensification of concurrent chemotherapy by adding oxaliplatin to fluorouracil or capecitabine backbone to get better outcomes is the matter that has remained unresolved. In this review, we searched Medline and Google Scholar databases and selected 28 prospective phase II and III clinical trials that addressed this question. We discussed the potential advantages and drawbacks of incorporating oxaliplatin into concurrent chemoradiation therapy. We tried to define whether adding oxaliplatin to concurrent chemoradiation with excellent performance and high-risk features benefits some subpopulations. The available literature suggests that by adding oxaliplatin there are some benefits in enhancing response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, however, without any translated improvements in long-term outcomes including overall and disease-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reza Nazari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Reza Ghalehtaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyed Mohsen Ahmadi-Tafti
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
| | - Behnam Behboudi
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
| | - Nima Mousavi Darzikolaee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahdi Aghili
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sychev S, Ponomarenko A, Chernyshov S, Alekseev M, Mamedli Z, Kuzmichev D, Polynovskiy A, Rybakov E. Total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials. Ann Coloproctol 2023; 39:289-300. [PMID: 37038270 PMCID: PMC10475801 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2022.00920.0131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the efficacy of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for rectal carcinoma in comparison with conventional chemoradiotherapy (CRT). METHODS A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was done using NetMetaXL and WinBUGS. This study was registered in PROSPERO on March 3, 2022 (No. CRD-42022307867). RESULTS Outcomes of 2,719 patients from 10 randomized trials between 2010 and 2022 were selected. Of these 1,191 (44%) had conventional long-course CRT (50-54 Gy) and capecitabine, 506 (18%) had induction chemotherapy followed by CRT (50-54 Gy) and capecitabine (iTNT), 230 (9%) had long-course CRT (50-54 Gy) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (cTNT), and 792 (29%) undergone modified short-course radiotherapy (25 Gy) with subsequent chemotherapy (mTNT). Total pathologic complete response (pCR) was 20% in the iTNT group, 21% in the mTNT group, 22% in the cTNT group, and 12% in the CRT group. Statistically significant difference in pCR rates was detected when comparing iTNT with CRT (odds ratio [OR], 1.76; 95% credible interval [CrI], 1.06-2.8), mTNT with CRT (OR, 1.90; 95% CrI, 1.25-2.74), and cTNT with CRT groups (OR, 2.54; 95% CrI, 1.26-5.08). No differences were found in R0 resection rates. No significant difference was found in long-term outcomes. CONCLUSION The early administration of systemic chemotherapy in the TNT regimen has improved short-term outcomes, though long-term results are underreported. Randomized trials with survival as the endpoint are necessary to evaluate the possible advantages of TNT modes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergey Sychev
- Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology, Moscow, Russia
| | | | | | - Mikhail Alekseev
- Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Zaman Mamedli
- N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Dmitriy Kuzmichev
- N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Andrey Polynovskiy
- N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Evgeny Rybakov
- Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
van den Berg K, Schaap DP, Voogt ELK, Buffart TE, Verheul HMW, de Groot JWB, Verhoef C, Melenhorst J, Roodhart JML, de Wilt JHW, van Westreenen HL, Aalbers AGJ, van 't Veer M, Marijnen CAM, Vincent J, Simkens LHJ, Peters NAJB, Berbée M, Werter IM, Snaebjornsson P, Peulen HMU, van Lijnschoten IG, Roef MJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Bloemen JG, Willems JMWE, Creemers GJM, Nederend J, Rutten HJT, Burger JWA. Neoadjuvant FOLFOXIRI prior to chemoradiotherapy for high-risk ("ugly") locally advanced rectal cancer: study protocol of a single-arm, multicentre, open-label, phase II trial (MEND-IT). BMC Cancer 2022; 22:957. [PMID: 36068495 PMCID: PMC9446695 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09947-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The presence of mesorectal fascia (MRF) invasion, grade 4 extramural venous invasion (EMVI), tumour deposits (TD) or extensive or bilateral extramesorectal (lateral) lymph nodes (LLN) on MRI has been suggested to identify patients with indisputable, extensive locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), at high risk of treatment failure. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether or not intensified chemotherapy prior to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy improves the complete response (CR) rate in these patients. Methods This multicentre, single-arm, open-label, phase II trial will include 128 patients with non-metastatic high-risk LARC (hr-LARC), fit for triplet chemotherapy. To ensure a study population with indisputable, unfavourable prognostic characteristics, hr-LARC is defined as LARC with on baseline MRI at least one of the following characteristics; MRF invasion, EMVI grade 4, enlarged bilateral or extensive LLN at high risk of an incomplete resection, or TD. Exclusion criteria are the presence of a homozygous DPD deficiency, distant metastases, any chemotherapy within the past 6 months, previous radiotherapy within the pelvic area precluding standard chemoradiotherapy, and any contraindication for the planned treatment. All patients will be planned for six two-weekly cycles of FOLFOXIRI (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and irinotecan) prior to chemoradiotherapy (25 × 2 Gy or 28 × 1.8 Gy with concomitant capecitabine). A resection will be performed following radiological confirmation of resectable disease after the completion of chemoradiotherapy. A watch and wait strategy is allowed in case of a clinical complete response. The primary endpoint is the CR rate, described as a pathological CR or a sustained clinical CR one year after chemoradiotherapy. The main secondary objectives are long-term oncological outcomes, radiological and pathological response, the number of resections with clear margins, treatment-related toxicity, perioperative complications, health-related costs, and quality of life. Discussion This trial protocol describes the MEND-IT study. The MEND-IT study aims to evaluate the CR rate after intensified chemotherapy prior to concomitant chemoradiotherapy in a homogeneous group of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and indisputably unfavourable characteristics, defined as hr-LARC, in order to improve their prognosis. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04838496, registered on 02–04-2021 Netherlands Trial Register: NL9790. Protocol version Version 3 dd 11–4-2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K van den Berg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - D P Schaap
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - E L K Voogt
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - T E Buffart
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H M W Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - J W B de Groot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Isala Oncology Centre, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - C Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Melenhorst
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - J M L Roodhart
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - J H W de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - A G J Aalbers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M van 't Veer
- Department of Research and Education, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - C A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - J Vincent
- Department of Medical Oncology, Elkerliek Hospital, Helmond, the Netherlands
| | - L H J Simkens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - N A J B Peters
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Jans Hospital, Weert, the Netherlands
| | - M Berbée
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - I M Werter
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | - P Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H M U Peulen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - I G van Lijnschoten
- Department of Pathology, PAMM Laboratory for Pathology and Medical Microbiology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - M J Roef
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - J G Bloemen
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - J M W E Willems
- Department of Medical Oncology, Anna Hospital, Geldrop, the Netherlands
| | - G J M Creemers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - J Nederend
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - H J T Rutten
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - J W A Burger
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Li A, Huang T, Zheng R, Chi P, Li Z, Wang X, Xu B. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and triweekly oxaliplatin versus capecitabine monotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a propensity-score matched study. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:789. [PMID: 35850711 PMCID: PMC9295262 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09855-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Distant metastasis has been the main failure pattern for locoregionally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients, and intensified neoadjuvant chemotherapy has become a popular research topic. The present study aimed to compare the survival outcomes, acute toxicities and surgical complications in LARC patients who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy with triweekly oxaliplatin and capecitabine (triweekly XELOX) or capecitabine. Methods: Between 2007 and 2017, patients with clinically staged II-III rectal cancer who were treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy using either triweekly XELOX (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 plus capecitabine 825 mg/m2) or capecitabine were included. Variables potentially influencing chemotherapy treatment selection were used to generate propensity scores (PS). The association between chemotherapy regimens and survival endpoints, including distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), were evaluated and adjusted with PS. The acute toxicities and surgical complications were also compared. Results A total of 810 patients were included in the analysis; 277 (34.2%) patients received triweekly XELOX, and 533 (65.8%) received capecitabine. The pathological complete response (pCR) rates were 20.2 and 19.9% (P = 0.912) for the groups treated with triweekly XELOX and capecitabine, respectively. The 5-year DMFS, OS and DFS with triweekly XELOX versus capecitabine were 75.6% vs. 77.6% (P = 0.555), 79.2% vs. 83.3% (P = 0.101), and 69.9% vs. 73.7% (P = 0.283), respectively. Triweekly XELOX was not associated with an increased risk of severe toxicity during chemoradiotherapy, but it increased the risk of postoperative complications compared to capecitabine. After PS adjustment, the differences between the two groups remained insignificant in pCR rate, survival outcomes, and acute toxicities, and the difference in surgical complications disappeared. Conclusions Triweekly XELOX or capecitabine concurrent with neoadjuvant radiotherapy leads to similar long-term survival outcomes, acute toxicities and surgical complications in LARC patients. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09855-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anchuan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Xinquan Road 29, Fuzhou, 350001, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, China.,Fujian Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Precision Radiotherapy for Tumors, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, China.,Clinical Research Center for Radiology and Radiotherapy of Fujian Province (Digestive, Hematological and Breast Malignancies), Fuzhou, 350001, China
| | - Tingxuan Huang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Xinquan Road 29, Fuzhou, 350001, China.,Fujian Medical University Cancer Center, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, China
| | - Rong Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Xinquan Road 29, Fuzhou, 350001, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, China.,Fujian Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Precision Radiotherapy for Tumors, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, China.,Clinical Research Center for Radiology and Radiotherapy of Fujian Province (Digestive, Hematological and Breast Malignancies), Fuzhou, 350001, China
| | - Pan Chi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China
| | - Zhihua Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Hospital of Zhangzhou, Zhangzhou, 363100, China
| | - Xiaozhong Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Xinquan Road 29, Fuzhou, 350001, China. .,Fujian Medical University Cancer Center, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
| | - Benhua Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Xinquan Road 29, Fuzhou, 350001, China. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, China. .,Fujian Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Precision Radiotherapy for Tumors, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, China. .,Clinical Research Center for Radiology and Radiotherapy of Fujian Province (Digestive, Hematological and Breast Malignancies), Fuzhou, 350001, China. .,Department of Medical Imagine Technology, College of Medical Technology and Engineering, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Feng W, Yu B, Zhang Z, Li J, Wang Y. Current status of total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2021; 18:546-559. [PMID: 34818447 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) plus total mesorectal excision (TME) has been the standard regimen for treatment of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), because it significantly reduces the rate of local recurrence and enables sphincter preservation. However, distant metastasis remains the major reason for treatment failure, and the value of postoperative chemotherapy is still controversial. Recent studies have examined the use of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), defined as induction and/or consolidation chemotherapy (CONCT) with radiotherapy (RT) or nCRT prior to surgery. The results indicated that TNT may increase the rates of chemotherapy compliance and pathological complete response (pCR), and probably improve the success rate of sphincter preservation surgery. TNT may also improve disease-free survival and overall survival, and even reduce the rate of relapse. Here, we critically appraise the existing literature on three different TNT schemes used for LARC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Bin Yu
- The Second Department of Surgery, Hebei Medical University Fourth Affiliated Hospital and Hebei Provincial Tumor Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Zhenya Zhang
- The Second Department of Surgery, Hebei Medical University Fourth Affiliated Hospital and Hebei Provincial Tumor Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Juan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hebei Medical University Fourth Affiliated Hospital and Hebei Provincial Tumor Hospital & Hebei Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Yuxiang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hebei Medical University Fourth Affiliated Hospital and Hebei Provincial Tumor Hospital & Hebei Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shijiazhuang, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
PelvEx Collaborative, Voogt ELK, Nordkamp S, Aalbers AGJ, Buffart T, Creemers GJ, Marijnen CAM, Verhoef C, Havenga K, Holman FA, Kusters M, Marinelli AWKS, Melenhorst J, Abdul Aziz N, Abecasis N, Abraham-Nordling M, Akiyoshi T, Alberda W, Albert M, Andric M, Angenete E, Antoniou A, Auer R, Austin KK, Aziz O, Baker RP, Bali M, Baseckas G, Bebington B, Bedford M, Bednarski BK, Beets GL, Beets-Tan RGH, Berbée M, Berg J, Berg PL, Beynon J, Biondo S, Bloemen JG, Boyle K, Bordeianou L, Bremers AB, Brunner M, Buchwald P, Bui A, Burgess A, Burling D, Burns E, Campain N, Carvalhal S, Castro L, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Ceha HM, Chan KKL, Chang GJ, Chang M, Chew MH, Chok AK, Chong P, Christensen HK, Clouston H, Codd M, Collins D, Colquhoun AJ, Corr A, Coscia M, Cosimelli M, Coyne PE, Crobach ASLP, Crolla RMPH, Croner RS, Damjanovic L, Daniels IR, Davies M, Davies RJ, Delaney CP, de Roos MAJ, de Wilt JHW, den Hartogh MD, Denost Q, Deseyne P, Deutsch C, de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel R, de Vries M, Dieters M, Dietz D, Domingo S, Doukas M, Dozois EJ, Duff M, Eglinton T, Enrique-Navascues JM, Espin-Basany E, Evans MD, Eyjólfsdóttir B, Fahy M, Fearnhead NS, Feshtali S, Flatmark K, Fleming F, et alPelvEx Collaborative, Voogt ELK, Nordkamp S, Aalbers AGJ, Buffart T, Creemers GJ, Marijnen CAM, Verhoef C, Havenga K, Holman FA, Kusters M, Marinelli AWKS, Melenhorst J, Abdul Aziz N, Abecasis N, Abraham-Nordling M, Akiyoshi T, Alberda W, Albert M, Andric M, Angenete E, Antoniou A, Auer R, Austin KK, Aziz O, Baker RP, Bali M, Baseckas G, Bebington B, Bedford M, Bednarski BK, Beets GL, Beets-Tan RGH, Berbée M, Berg J, Berg PL, Beynon J, Biondo S, Bloemen JG, Boyle K, Bordeianou L, Bremers AB, Brunner M, Buchwald P, Bui A, Burgess A, Burling D, Burns E, Campain N, Carvalhal S, Castro L, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Ceha HM, Chan KKL, Chang GJ, Chang M, Chew MH, Chok AK, Chong P, Christensen HK, Clouston H, Codd M, Collins D, Colquhoun AJ, Corr A, Coscia M, Cosimelli M, Coyne PE, Crobach ASLP, Crolla RMPH, Croner RS, Damjanovic L, Daniels IR, Davies M, Davies RJ, Delaney CP, de Roos MAJ, de Wilt JHW, den Hartogh MD, Denost Q, Deseyne P, Deutsch C, de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel R, de Vries M, Dieters M, Dietz D, Domingo S, Doukas M, Dozois EJ, Duff M, Eglinton T, Enrique-Navascues JM, Espin-Basany E, Evans MD, Eyjólfsdóttir B, Fahy M, Fearnhead NS, Feshtali S, Flatmark K, Fleming F, Folkesson J, Frizelle FA, Frödin JE, Gallego MA, Garcia-Granero E, Garcia-Sabrido JL, Geboes K, Gentilini L, George ML, George V, Ghouti L, Giner F, Ginther N, Glyn T, Glynn R, Golda T, Grabsch HI, Griffiths B, Harris DA, Hagemans JAW, Hanchanale V, Harji DP, Helewa RM, Helgason H, Hellawell G, Heriot AG, Heyman S, Hochman D, Hoff C, Hohenberger W, Holm T, Hompes R, Horsthuis K, Hospers G, Houwers J, Iversen H, Jenkins JT, Kaffenberger S, Kandaswamy GV, Kapur S, Kanemitsu Y, Kats-Ugurlu G, Kelley SR, Keller DS, Kelly ME, Keymeulen K, Khan MS, Kim H, Kim HJ, Koh CE, Kok NFM, Kokelaar R, Kontovounisios C, Kristensen HØ, Kroon HM, Kumar S, Lago V, Lakkis Z, Lamberg T, Larsen SG, Larson DW, Law WL, Laurberg S, Lee PJ, Leseman-Hoogenboom MM, Limbert M, Lydrup ML, Lyons A, Lynch AC, Mantyh C, Mathis KL, Margues CFS, Martling A, Meijer OWM, Meijerink WJHJ, Merchea A, Merkel S, Mehta AM, McArthur DR, McDermott FD, McGrath JS, Malde S, Mirnezami A, Monson JRT, Morton JR, Nederend J, Negoi I, Neto JWM, Ng JL, Nguyen B, Nielsen MB, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Nilsson PJ, Nilsson ML, Oei S, Oliver A, O’Dwyer ST, Oppedijk V, Palmer G, Pappou E, Park J, Patsouras D, Pellino G, Peterson AC, Peulen HMU, Poggioli G, Proud D, Quinn M, Quyn A, Rajendran N, Radwan RW, Rasheed S, Rasmussen PC, Rausa E, Regenbogen SE, Renehan A, Richir MC, Rocha R, Rochester M, Rohila J, Rothbarth J, Rottoli M, Roxburgh C, Rozema T, Safar B, Sagar PM, Sahai A, Saklani A, Sammour T, Sayyed R, Schizas AMP, Schwarzkopf E, Scripcariu V, Selvasekar C, Shaikh I, Shida D, Simpson A, Skeie-Jensen T, Slangen JJG, Smart NJ, Smart P, Smith JJ, Snaebjornsson P, Solbakken AM, Solomon MJ, Sørensen MM, Sorrentino L, Speetjens FM, Spillenaar Bilgen EJ, Steele SR, Steffens D, Stitzenberg K, Stocchi L, Stylianides NA, Swartling T, Sumrien H, Sutton PA, Swartking T, Tan EJ, Taylor C, Tekkis PP, Teras J, Terpstra V, Thurairaja R, Toh EL, Tsarkov P, Tsukada Y, Tsukamoto S, Tuech JJ, Turner WH, Tuynman JB, van Duyn EB, van Grevenstein WMU, van Grieken NCT, van Iersel L, van Lijnschoten G, van Meerten E, van Ramshorst GH, Westreenen HLV, van Zoggel D, Vasquez-Jimenez W, Velema LA, Verdaasdonk E, Verheul HMW, Versteeg KS, Vizzielli G, Uehara K, Wakeman C, Warrier S, Wasmuth HH, Weber K, Weiser MR, Wheeler JMD, Wijffels NAT, Wild J, Willems JMWE, Wilson M, Winter DC, Wolthuis A, Wumkes ML, Yano H, Yip B, Yip J, Yoo RN, Zappa MA, Zimmerman DDE, Rutten HJT, Burger JWA. Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone as neoadjuvant treatment for locally recurrent rectal cancer: study protocol of a multicentre, open-label, parallel-arms, randomized controlled study (PelvEx II). BJS Open 2021; 5:zrab029. [PMID: 34089596 PMCID: PMC8179511 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab029] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Revised: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A resection with clear margins (R0 resection) is the most important prognostic factor in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). However, this is achieved in only 60 per cent of patients. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the addition of induction chemotherapy to neoadjuvant chemo(re)irradiation improves the R0 resection rate in LRRC. METHODS This multicentre, international, open-label, phase III, parallel-arms study will enrol 364 patients with resectable LRRC after previous partial or total mesorectal resection without synchronous distant metastases or recent chemo- and/or radiotherapy treatment. Patients will be randomized to receive either induction chemotherapy (three 3-week cycles of CAPOX (capecitabine, oxaliplatin), four 2-week cycles of FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin) or FOLFORI (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan)) followed by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery (experimental arm) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery alone (control arm). Tumours will be restaged using MRI and, in the experimental arm, a further cycle of CAPOX or two cycles of FOLFOX/FOLFIRI will be administered before chemoradiotherapy in case of stable or responsive disease. The radiotherapy dose will be 25 × 2.0 Gy or 28 × 1.8 Gy in radiotherapy-naive patients, and 15 × 2.0 Gy in previously irradiated patients. The concomitant chemotherapy agent will be capecitabine administered twice daily at a dose of 825 mg/m2 on radiotherapy days. The primary endpoint of the study is the R0 resection rate. Secondary endpoints are long-term oncological outcomes, radiological and pathological response, toxicity, postoperative complications, costs, and quality of life. DISCUSSION This trial protocol describes the PelvEx II study. PelvEx II, designed as a multicentre, open-label, phase III, parallel-arms study, is the first randomized study to compare induction chemotherapy followed by neoadjuvant chemo(re)irradiation and surgery with neoadjuvant chemo(re)irradiation and surgery alone in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer, with the aim of improving the number of R0 resections.
Collapse
|
11
|
Phase II randomized trial of capecitabine with bevacizumab and external beam radiation therapy as preoperative treatment for patients with resectable locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma: long term results. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:1164. [PMID: 33246428 PMCID: PMC7694337 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07661-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Preoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine is considered as a standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer. The “Tratamiento de Tumores Digestivos” group (TTD) previously reported in a randomized Ph II study that the addition of Bevacizumab to capecitabine-RT conferred no differences in the pre-defined efficacy endpoint (pathological complete response). We present the follow-up results of progression-free survival, distant relapse-free survival, and overall survival data at 3 and 5 years. Methods Patients (pts) were randomized to receive 5 weeks of radiotherapy (45 Gy/25 fractions) with concurrent Capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily, 5 days per week with (arm A) or without (arm b) bevacizumab (5 mg/kg once every 2 weeks). Results In our study, the addition of bevacizumab to capecitabine and radiotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting shows no differences in pathological complete response (15.9% vs 10.9%), distant relapse-free survival (81.0 vs 80.4 and 76.2% vs 78.2% at 3 and 5 years respectively), disease-free survival (75% vs 71.7 and 68.1% vs 69.57% at 3 and 5 years respectively) nor overall survival at 5-years of follow-up (81.8% vs 86.9%). Conclusions the addition of bevacizumab to capecitabine plus radiotherapy does not confer statistically significant advantages neither in distant relapse-free survival nor in disease-free survival nor in Overall Survival in the short or long term. Trial registration EudraCT number: 2009–010192-24. Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT01043484. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-020-07661-z.
Collapse
|
12
|
Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Treatment Outcomes. Ann Surg 2020; 271:440-448. [PMID: 31318794 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 241] [Impact Index Per Article: 48.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The addition of induction chemotherapy to concomitant neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer could increase pathological downstaging and act on occult micrometastatic disease, leading ultimately to a better outcome. A systematic review was carried out of the existing literature on the treatment outcomes of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) on locally advanced rectal cancer. TNT was defined as chemotherapy using cycles of induction and/or consolidation in conjunction with standard chemoradiotherapy prior to surgery. METHODS A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed according to the PRISMA statement up until January 2019. The primary endpoints were complete pathologic response (pCR), disease-free survival, and overall survival rates. RESULTS A total of 28 studies (3 retrospective and 25 prospective for a total of 3579 patients) were included in the final analysis (n = 2688 treated with TNT and n = 891 with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy therapy). The pooled pCR rate was 22.4% (95% CI 19.4%-25.7%) in all patients treated with TNT (n = 27 studies with data available). In n = 10 comparative studies with data available, TNT was found to increase the odds of pCR by 39% (1.40, 95% CI 1.08-1.81, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS The addition of induction or consolidation chemotherapy to standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy results in a higher pCR rate. Given that the comparative analysis was derived from few randomized publications, large confirmatory trials should be carried out before a strong recommendation is made in favor of TNT.
Collapse
|
13
|
Fu HT, Xu YY, Tian JJ, Fu JX, Nie SL, Tang YY, Chen P, Zong L. Long-term efficacy of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin chemotherapy on stage III colon cancer: A meta-analysis. World J Meta-Anal 2020; 8:27-40. [DOI: 10.13105/wjma.v8.i1.27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Revised: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 10/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many clinical studies for the long-term survival or efficacy of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) in colon cancer have already been studied, but its clinical benefit is controversial.
AIM To evaluate the long-term efficacy of XELOX regimen in comparison with other adjuvant chemotherapy protocols in colon cancer.
METHODS By searching the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases, a total of 12 randomized controlled trials involving 6698 stage III colon cancer cases (XELOX protocol: n = 3298 cases; other adjuvant chemotherapy protocol: n = 3268 cases) were included. The parameter outcomes included the overall survival and the disease-free survival. The quality control of selected literature was based on the Jadad scale and the GRADE system.
RESULTS In comparison to other adjuvant chemotherapy regimen, XELOX regimen showed a better overall survival (odds ratio = 1.29, 95% confidence interval: 1.15-1.44, P < 0.0001) and a better disease-free survival (odds ratio = 1.32, 95% confidence interval: 1.18-1.46, P < 0.0001) for colon cancer patients, suggesting the XELOX regimen can be a good option for postoperative treatment of stage III colon cancer.
CONCLUSION The XELOX regimen can be a preferred option for adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong-Tao Fu
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of South China, Hengyang 421000, Hunan Province, China
| | - Ying-Ying Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Yizheng People’s Hospital, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225000, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Jing-Jing Tian
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410013, Hunan Province, China
| | - Jia-Xin Fu
- Department of General Surgery, Northern Jiangsu People’s Hospital, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225000, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Shao-Ling Nie
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410000, Hunan Province, China
| | - Yan-Yan Tang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410000, Hunan Province, China
| | - Ping Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Northern Jiangsu People’s Hospital, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225000, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Liang Zong
- Department of General Surgery, Northern Jiangsu People’s Hospital, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225000, Jiangsu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zaborowski A, Stakelum A, Winter DC. Systematic review of outcomes after total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2019; 106:979-987. [PMID: 31074508 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2018] [Revised: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in surgical technique and the development of combined-modality therapy have led to significantly improved local control in rectal cancer. Distant failure rates however, remain high, ranging between 20 and 30 per cent. Additional systemic chemotherapy in the preoperative period has been proposed as a means of eradicating subclinical micrometastases and improving long-term survival. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the current evidence regarding induction chemotherapy in combination with standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, in terms of oncological outcomes, in patients with rectal cancer. METHODS A systematic review of the literature was performed to evaluate oncological outcomes and survival in patients with rectal cancer who underwent induction chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, followed by surgical resection. Four major databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane) were searched. The review included all original articles published in English reporting long-term outcomes, specifically survival data, and was limited to prospective studies only. RESULTS A total of 686 studies were identified. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, ten studies involving 648 patients were included. Median follow-up was 53·7 (range 26-80) months. Five-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 74·4 and 65·4 per cent respectively. Weighted mean local recurrence and distant failure rates were 3·5 (range 0-7) and 20·6 (range 5-31) per cent respectively. CONCLUSION Total neoadjuvant therapy should be considered in patients with high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer owing to improved chemotherapy compliance and disease control. Further prospective studies are required to determine whether this approach translates into improved disease-related survival or increases the proportion of patients suitable for non-operative management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Zaborowski
- Centre for Colorectal Disease, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - A Stakelum
- Centre for Colorectal Disease, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - D C Winter
- Centre for Colorectal Disease, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|