Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have emerged as groundbreaking therapeutic agents in managing a spectrum of metabolic disorders, demonstrating remarkable efficacy across multiple organ systems and disease states. These compounds are not only well-established in the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity-conditions for which they have received widespread approval-but also exhibit promising potential in addressing cardiovascular disease (CVD) and Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Recent investigations have begun to illuminate the utility of GLP-1RAs in the management of type 1 diabetes (T1D), as well as neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease and various behavioral disorders. A plethora of clinical trials have consistently validated the capacity of GLP-1RAs to improve glycemic control, promote weight loss, and mitigate cardiovascular risk factors in individuals with T2D and obesity. While their application in T1D remains limited due to safety concerns-particularly regarding the risks of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemic ketoacidosis-emerging data suggest that GLP-1RAs may offer hepatoprotective benefits, potentially reducing liver fat content and decelerating the progression of MASLD. The neuroprotective attributes of GLP-1 RAs have garnered significant interest, with research indicating their potential to alleviate cognitive decline associated with neurodegenerative diseases. Furthermore, preliminary findings highlight the role of GLP-1 RAs in addressing behavioral disorders, emphasizing their extensive therapeutic promise. This comprehensive review synthesizes the current evidence supporting the diverse therapeutic applications of GLP-1RAs, positioning them as "magic drug" therapies for metabolic and neurological disorders. As ongoing research continues to explore innovative applications and combinations of GLP-1RAs, the landscape of disease management in metabolic and neurological contexts is poised for transformative advancements. This review will also critically assess safety considerations and underscore the need for personalized treatment strategies to optimize patient outcomes in these complex and often comorbid conditions.

Incretin mimetics, including glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide agonists, have become first-line treatment options for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. Their therapeutic status is attributed to their high level of efficacy as well as positive impact on related comorbidities, such as sleep apnea and heart failure. Multiple incretin mimetics are currently available with different durations of drug action, dosing frequencies, and delivery devices. Patients may benefit from education on the proper drug administration, anticipated adverse effects, and nutrition considerations with treatment. Practitioners must monitor progress and support the patient to achieve maintenance doses for optimal weight reduction and diabetes-related outcomes. This review aims to present the current literature supporting US Food and Drug Administration-approved indications of incretin mimetics, equip healthcare professionals to optimize care for patients who are prescribed these agents, and provide insights into potential future applications, which may include dual- or triple-mechanism agents that are injected or administered orally. Additional studies are anticipated with existing and future incretin mimetics for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, obesity, and related comorbidities in a rapidly developing therapeutic pipeline.

The last two decades have proffered many remarkable choices in managing type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Leading the list are glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs), the first of which, exenatide, was approved by the FDA in 2005. Two other major classes of drugs have also entered the market: dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, commonly known as gliptins and approved in 2006, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, with the first approval occurring in 2013. These drugs have revolutionized the treatment of diabetes. Additionally, on the horizon, the once-weekly basal insulin analog insulin icodec and the once-weekly combination of insulin icodec and semaglutide are expected to be available in the future. Beyond glycemic control, GLP1RAs have exhibited benefits in conditions associated with diabetes, including hypertension, dyslipidemia, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, as well as in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease. Additionally, emerging research suggests potential roles in certain types of cancer, infertility, and associative learning. Major cardiovascular events seem to be lower in patients on GLP1RAs. While some evidence is robust, other findings remain tenuous. It is important that clinicians are familiar with current research in order to provide optimal evidence-based care to patients. In the not-too-distant future, there may be a case to prescribe these drugs for benefits outside diabetes.

We are at the start of an exciting new era of very effective pharmacotherapy for patients with obesity, with the latest generation of drugs approaching the efficacy of obesity surgery. Clinical trials of obesity drugs tend to emphasise the importance of participation in some form of structured lifestyle intervention for all trial participants. This usually consists of advice to reduce calorie intake and increase moderate to vigorous physical activity. There is strong evidence that structured lifestyle modification programmes improve health in patients with obesity and related disorders. However, there is no specific evidence that they improve the response to obesity medications. This is because of the way that drug trials for patients with obesity have traditionally been designed, with participants in the active drug treatment group being compared to participants on placebo drug treatment, but with both groups always receiving the same structured lifestyle intervention. While this approach is entirely reasonable, it makes it impossible to draw any inferences about the efficacy of structured lifestyle modification to augment the response to drug therapy. Given this genuine equipoise, a critical step in ensuring that our treatment of patients with obesity is robustly evidence-based is to determine whether "drug plus lifestyle" offer any advantage over "drug plus placebo" in large, well-designed and adequately powered clinical trials. We also need to determine the cost-effectiveness of these programmes.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), and dual GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) or glucagon receptor agonists have emerged as promising agents to treat metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)/metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Although the beneficial effects of GLP-1RAs on glycemic control and weight are well-established, clinicians may be unfamiliar with other potential benefits of this class.

We examined the pleiotropic effects of GLP-1RAs and how they relate to gastroenterologists for MASLD/MASH treatment. Our narrative review of English articles included four GLP-1RAs (subcutaneous semaglutide, liraglutide, dulaglutide, and efpeglenatide), a dual GLP-1/GIP agonist (tirzepatide), a dual GLP-1/glucagon receptor agonist (survodutide), MASLD/MASH, related disorders, clinical management, treatment outcomes and landscape.

In Phase I - III trials, GLP-1RAs are associated with clinically relevant hepatic improvements including MASH resolution, liver fat reduction, and preventing worsening fibrosis. Effects on cardiometabolic parameters align with type 2 diabetes/obesity Phase III data, comprising substantial improvements in glycemic, weight, and cardiovascular outcomes. Promising data also suggest benefits in common comorbidities, including obstructive sleep apnea, polycystic ovary syndrome, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.GLP-1RAs represent a valuable pharmacotherapeutic option for gastroenterologists managing individuals with MASLD/MASH and cardiometabolic comorbid conditions.

The effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on lipid components are unclear. We aim to quantify the lipid lowering effects of GLP1-RAs.

A comprehensive database search for placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on GLP-1RA treatment was conducted until January 2023. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed, and outcomes were analyzed using a random-effects model to calculate weighted mean differences (MDs) in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary endpoint was the mean difference in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Secondary endpoints included total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides, high density lipoprotein-C (HLD-C), and very low-density lipoprotein-C (VLDL-C). Subgroup analyses and meta-regression accounted for covariates.

GLP-1RAs modestly reduced LDL-C (MD -2.93, 95% CI (-5.01, -0.85), p = 0.01), consistent across treatment durations: ≤12 weeks (MD: -5.39, 95% CI (-10.36, -0.42), p = 0.03) and >12 weeks (MD: -2.39, 95% CI (-4.70, -0.007), p = 0.04). GLP-1RA reduced TC by ∼7 mg/dl. There was no significant reduction in triglycerides (MD = -7.19, 95% CI (-15.01, 0.62), p = 0.07) or VLDL-C (MD = -3.99, 95%, CI (-8.73, 0.75), p = 0.10). GLP-1RA did not increase HDL-C (MD = -0.12, 95% CI (-0.73, 0.49), p = 0.69). Weight change did not influence LDL-C (tau2 = 28.38, I2 = 99.83, R2 = 0.0, p = 0.67) or TC (tau2 = 93.6, I2 = 99.86, R2 = 0.0, p = 0.92).

GLP-1RA treatment modestly decreased LDL-C and TC but did not significantly affect triglycerides, VLDL-C, or HDL-C.

This review examines the impact of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on lipid profiles in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or obesity, crucial for optimizing cardiovascular risk management.

GLP-1RAs affect lipid levels by reducing intestinal apolipoprotein B48 production and mesenteric lymph flow, while increasing catabolism of apolipoprotein B100. It remains unknown whether these effects are direct or indirect, but the improvements in lipid levels are strongly correlated to the drug-induced weight loss. Clinical trials demonstrate improvements in lipid profiles, with different effects per agent and dose. We deem it unlikely that improved lipid levels are sufficient to explain the beneficial effects of GLP-1RA on cardiovascular risk, especially given the improvement of many other risk factors (body weight, glycemic control, inflammation) while using these agents. Posthoc mediation analyses of large cardiovascular outcome trials may shed some light on the relative importance of each risk factor.

GLP-1RAs improve lipid profiles in clinical trials, but their complete cardiovascular benefits likely involve multifactorial mechanisms beyond lipid modulation.

This study evaluates the effects of liraglutide on albuminuria, oxidative stress, and inflammation in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients with different urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) categories. We enrolled 107 patients with T2D who were initiating liraglutide for glycemic control. Patients were categorized into 3 groups: group I (UACR < 30 mg/g); group II (30 mg/g ≤ UACR ≤ 300 mg/g); group III (UACR > 300 mg/g). We observed the changes in body mass index, fasting plasma glucose, glycated hemoglobin, lipid profile, serum liver enzymes, creatinine, uric acid, cystatin C, UACR, as well as oxidative stress and inflammation biomarkers such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione peroxidase before and after 3 months of liraglutide treatment. After 3-month liraglutide treatment, fasting plasma glucose, glycated hemoglobin, and body mass index significantly decreased in all 3 groups regardless of the baseline UACR (all P < .05). UACR significantly decreased in groups II (P = .005) and III (P = .001). Patients with higher UACR at baseline showed significantly greater albuminuria reduction (P < .001). Compared with baseline, TNF-α, IL-6, MCP-1, and MDA were remarkably decreased, while SOD and glutathione peroxidase were significantly increased in all 3 groups (P < .05). UACR at baseline showed a positive correlation with TNF-α, IL-6, and MDA, and a negative correlation with SOD at baseline. The change in UACR was negatively correlated with UACR, TNF-α, and MDA at baseline, while it was positively correlated with SOD at baseline, and also positively correlated with the change in MCP-1. Liraglutide ameliorated albuminuria in T2D patients with microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria. The renoprotective effect of liraglutide was associated with the alleviation of oxidative stress and inflammation. These findings may provide new therapeutic strategies for patients with diabetic kidney disease.

Incretin-based therapies have emerged as effective treatments for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity. However, not all patients achieve optimal outcomes with existing treatments, highlighting the need for more effective solutions.

We present a comprehensive evaluation of Tirzepatide (TZP), a novel dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide/glucagon-like peptide-1 (GIP/GLP-1) receptor agonist, for managing obesity and T2D. We conducted a systematic search of Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception to April 2024. The focus of the review is on the development and therapeutic potential of TZP, with detailed exploration on pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety. Furthermore, it reviews TZP's impacts on glycemic control, weight management, and its potential cardiovascular (CV) benefits.

TZP represents a significant advancement in the dual-targeted approach to treating T2D and obesity. Its unique mechanism of action offers superior efficacy in reducing glycemic levels and body weight compared to existing therapies. New data suggesting improvements in CV outcomes indicate that TZP could set a new standard in the treatment paradigm. While long-term data on efficacy and safety are still forthcoming, current evidence positions TZP as a promising option for patients who have not reached their therapeutic goals with existing treatments.

In recent years, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists have garnered increasing attention for their potential cardiovascular benefits beyond glycemic control in patients with diabetes. Understanding the research landscape surrounding GLP-1 agonists and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) is crucial for informing clinical practice and guiding future research endeavors. This bibliometric analysis aimed to comprehensively assess the scholarly output and trends in this field, shedding light on the evolving landscape of GLP-1 agonists' role in cardiovascular health.

The publications concerning GLP-1 agonists in CVDs were gathered from the Web of Science Core Collection, and visualizations were created utilizing Excel 2019, Cite Space, and VOS viewer software.

Using bibliometric and visual methods, the research hotspots and trends regarding GLP-1 agonists in cardiovascular diseases were pinpointed. Additionally, a thriving interest in GLP-1 agonists research within cardiovascular medicine was observed, with a notable surge in publications from 2016 onwards. The analysis revealed that the United States and China are the leading contributors, accounting for over 50% of the total publications. The University of Copenhagen and the University of Toronto emerged as the most prolific institutions in this field. Co-citation analysis highlighted the influential role of landmark clinical trials, such as the LEADER, ELIXA, and EXSCEL. Keyword trend analysis identified the emergence of newer GLP-1 agonists, such as tirzepatide and semaglutide, as well as a growing focus on topics like 'healthy obesity' and chronic kidney disease. These findings suggest that the research landscape is evolving, with a focus on expanding the therapeutic applications of GLP-1 agonists beyond glycemic control. Overall, this bibliometric analysis provided insights into the current state and future directions of research on GLP-1 agonists and their impact on cardiovascular health, guiding future research endeavors, and informing clinical practice.

Incretin receptor agonists (IRAs), primarily composed of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor agonists (GIPRAs), work by mimicking the actions of the endogenous incretin hormones in the body. GLP-1RAs have been approved for use as monotherapy and in combination with GIPRAs for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In addition to their role in glucose regulation, IRAs have demonstrated various benefits such as cardiovascular protection, obesity management, and regulation of bone turnover. Some studies have suggested that IRAs not only aid in glycemic control but also exhibit anti-atherosclerotic effects. These agents have been shown to modulate lipid abnormalities, reduce blood pressure, and preserve the structural and functional integrity of the endothelium. Furthermore, IRAs have the ability to mitigate inflammation by inhibiting macrophage activation and promoting M2 polarization. Research has also indicated that IRAs can decrease macrophage foam cell formation and prevent vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) phenotype switching, which are pivotal in atheromatous plaque formation and stability. This review offers a comprehensive overview of the protective effects of IRAs in atherosclerotic disease, with a focus on their impact on atherogenesis.

Diabetes leads to a significantly accelerated incidence of various related macrovascular complications, including peripheral vascular disease and cardiovascular disease (the most common cause of mortality in diabetes), as well as microvascular complications such as kidney disease and retinopathy. Endothelial dysfunction is the main pathogenic event of diabetes-related vascular disease at the earliest stage of vascular injury. Understanding the molecular processes involved in the development of diabetes and its debilitating vascular complications might bring up more effective and specific clinical therapies. Long-acting glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 analogs are currently available in treating diabetes with widely established safety and extensively evaluated efficacy. In recent years, autophagy, as a critical lysosome-dependent self-degradative process to maintain homeostasis, has been shown to be involved in the vascular endothelium damage in diabetes. In this review, the GLP-1/GLP-1R system implicated in diabetic endothelial dysfunction and related autophagy mechanism underlying the pathogenesis of diabetic vascular complications are briefly presented. This review also highlights a possible crosstalk between autophagy and the GLP-1/GLP-1R axis in the treatment of diabetic angiopathy.

Type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a complicated long-term disorder associated with metabolism that is identified by insulin resistance, imbalance in glucose regulation and reduced secretion of insulin. GLP-1(Glucagon-like peptide-1) is an incretin mimetic that has excellent effects on the regulation of blood glucose levels and also the management of disorders associated with vital organs. GLP-1 agonist is an effective class of drug for the treatment of type-2 diabetes mellitus and associated complications. Liraglutide is one of the potent drugs of this class having similar effects as biological GLP-1. This review includes clinical trials and patents related to the pharmaceutical formulation, synthesis and biological action of liraglutide.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use has increased over the last decade for glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular risk reduction, and weight loss. Clinical trials indicate that gastrointestinal adverse effects are commonly experienced and severe hypoglycemia is rare; however, there is little data regarding glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist in overdose.

We performed a retrospective chart review evaluating and characterizing glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exposures reported to a single poison center between 2006 and 2023. Patient demographics, circumstances of exposure, clinical effects, and outcomes were abstracted from charts. Descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize demographic information and clinical factor data.

A total of 152 charts met inclusion criteria. Therapeutic errors accounted for 91% of exposures. Most patients (67%) reported no symptoms, although not all patients were followed to a definitive outcome. Nausea, vomiting, generalized weakness, and abdominal pain were the predominant symptoms reported. Most patients (62%) were monitored and closely followed in the home setting. Hypoglycemia was rare but occurred in the setting of a single agent glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exposure in two patients. Two additional patients who developed hypoglycemia involved co-administration of insulin. 21% of the exposures were related to errors on initial use of the pen.

Exposures to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist have increased substantially over the years. Effects from an exposure tended to be mild and primarily involve gastrointestinal symptoms. Hypoglycemia was rare. Therapeutic and administration errors were common. Education on pen administration may help to reduce errors.

This randomized, open-label, parallel-group, controlled trial compared the effects of dulaglutide and trelagliptin on beta-cell function in patients with type 2 diabetes.

For 24 weeks, participants received dulaglutide (0.75 mg/week) or trelagliptin (100 mg/week), after which beta-cell function was evaluated using a glucagon stimulation test-based disposition index. The primary endpoint was the change in disposition index over the 24-week treatment period.

Fifty patients with type 2 diabetes who received metformin with or without basal insulin were randomized to receive dulaglutide or trelagliptin. Forty-eight patients completed the 24-week dulaglutide (n = 23) or trelagliptin (n = 25) treatment. The dulaglutide group reduced HbA1c levels more than the trelagliptin group (dulaglutide: - 0.77% ± 0.07% vs. trelagliptin: - 0.57% ± 0.07%; p = 0.04). Change in disposition index during the 24 weeks did not differ between the groups (dulaglutide: - 0.07 ± 1.08 vs. trelagliptin: + 0.59 ± 1.04; p = 0.66), but the dulaglutide group increased HOMA2-%β levels more than the trelagliptin group (dulaglutide: + 26.2 ± 4.3% vs. trelagliptin: + 5.4 ± 4.1%; p = 0.001). The dulaglutide group showed greater body fat mass reduction than the trelagliptin group (dulaglutide: - 1.2 ± 0.3 kg vs. trelagliptin: - 0.3 ± 0.2 kg; p = 0.02) without skeletal muscle mass loss.

Dulaglutide and trelagliptin had similar effects on beta-cell function according to the glucagon stimulation test-based disposition index. However, dulaglutide promoted improved HOMA2-%β levels compared to trelagliptin and body fat mass was reduced without loss of skeletal muscle mass (UMIN-CTR 000024164).

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13340-024-00717-6.

Currently, metabolic surgery (MS) constitutes the most effective means for durable weight loss of clinically meaningful magnitude, type 2 diabetes remission and resolution of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, as well as other obesity-related comorbidities. Accumulating evidence on the mechanisms through which MS exerts its actions has highlighted the altered secretion of hormonally active peptides of intestinal origin with biological actions crucial to energy metabolism as key drivers of MS clinical effects. The initial success of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists regarding weight loss and metabolic amelioration have been followed by the development of unimolecular dual and triple polyagonists, additionally exploiting the effects of glucagon and/or glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) which achieves a magnitude of weight loss approximating that of common MS operations. Through the implementation of such therapies, the feasibility of a "medical bypass", namely the replication of the clinical effects of MS through non-surgical interventions may be foreseeable in the near future. Apart from weight loss, this approach ought to be put to the test also regarding other clinical outcomes, such as liver steatosis and steatohepatitis, cardiovascular disease, and overall prognosis, on which MS has a robustly demonstrated impact. Besides, a medical bypass as an alternative, salvage, or combination strategy to MS may promote precision medicine in obesity therapeutics.

GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) are increasingly used to treat adolescent obesity. However, the effect on endogenous GLP-1 secretory patterns following treatment in adolescents is unknown. The GLP-1RA exenatide was shown to significantly lower BMI and 2-hour glucose in adolescents with obesity, in the placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trial Combat-JUDO. The aim of this study was to evaluate effects of weekly injections of 2 mg exenatide extended release on secretory patterns of endogenous hormones during OGTT.

This study was a pre-planned sub-study of the Combat-JUDO trial, set at the Pediatric clinic at Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden and Paracelsus Medical University, Austria. 44 adolescents with obesity were included and randomized 1:1 to treatment:placebo. 19 patients in the treatment group and 18 in the placebo group completed the trial. Before and after treatment, GLP-1, glucose, insulin, glucagon and glicentin levels were measured during OGTT; DPP-4 and proinsulin were measured at fasting. A per-protocol approach was used in the analyses.

Exenatide treatment did not affect GLP-1 levels during OGTT. Treatment significantly lowered DPP-4, proinsulin and the proinsulin-to-insulin ratio at fasting, increased glicentin levels but did not affect insulin, C-peptide or glucagon levels during OGTT.

Weekly s.c. injections with 2 mg of exenatide maintains endogenous total GLP-1 levels and lowers circulating DPP-4 levels. This adds an argument in favor of using exenatide in the treatment of pediatric obesity.

clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02794402.

Obesity drives type 2 diabetes (T2DM) development. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) has lower weight reduction than other bariatric procedures. Liraglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, improves weight and glycaemic control in patients with T2DM. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of liraglutide 1.8 mg in participants undergoing LAGB.

GLIDE, a pilot randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, evaluated LAGB with either liraglutide 1.8 mg or placebo in participants with T2DM and obesity. Participants were randomised (1:1) to 6-months therapy post-LAGB, with further 6 months off-treatment follow-up. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c from randomisation to the end of treatment, secondary outcomes included body weight change. A sample size of 58 (29 per group) had 80% power to detect a 0.6% difference in HbA1c between groups.

Twenty-seven participants were randomised to liraglutide (n = 13) or placebo (n = 14). Multivariate analysis showed no difference between placebo and liraglutide arms in HbA1c at 6 months (HbA1c:0.2 mmol/mol, -11.3, 11.6, p = 0.98) however, at 12 months HbA1c was significantly higher in the liraglutide arm (HbA1c:10.9 mmol/mol, 1.1, 20.6, p = 0.032). There was no difference between arms in weight at 6 months (BW:2.0 kg, -4.2, 8.1, p = 0.50), however, at 12 months weight was significantly higher in the liraglutide arm (BW:8.2 kg, 1.6, 14.9, p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in adverse events between groups.

Our pilot data suggest no additional improvement in glycaemic control or BW with LAGB and liraglutide therapy. However, this trial was significantly underpowered to detect a significant change in the primary or secondary outcomes. Further trials are needed to investigate whether GLP-1 agonists, and particularly with more effective weekly agents (i.e. semaglutide or tirzepatide), are of benefit following metabolic surgery.

EudraCT number 2015-005402-11.

Liraglutide effectively controls blood glucose level and reduces body weight. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a biosimilar liraglutide (Melitide®; CinnaGen, Tehran, Iran) to the reference liraglutide (Victoza®; Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

In this phase 3 clinical noninferiority trial, adult patients with inadequately controlled T2DM and with hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) levels of 7-10.5% on at least two oral glucose-lowering drugs with stable doses for at least 3 months were randomized to receive Melitide® (n = 150) or Victoza® (n = 150) 1.8 mg/day for 26 weeks. The primary outcome was assessment of the noninferiority of Melitide® to Victoza® in terms of change in HbA1C level with a prespecified margin of 0.4%. The secondary outcomes were the assessment of additional efficacy parameters (including the proportion of patients achieving HbA1C levels of < 7%), the incidence of adverse events, and immunogenicity.

Of the 300 participants enrolled in this study, 235 were included in the per-protocol analysis (112 in the Melitide® group and 123 in the Victoza® group). The mean (standard deviation) changes in HbA1C were - 1.76% (1.22) in the Melitide® group and - 1.59% (1.31) in the Victoza® group. The upper limit of the 95% one-sided confidence interval (CI) of the mean difference between Melitide® and Victoza® in lowering HbA1C was lower than the predefined margin (mean difference - 0.18, 95% CI - 0.5 to 0.15). Similar findings were obtained with the intention-to-treat analysis. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two study arms regarding the proportion of patients achieving HbA1C < 7% (p = 0.210), other efficacy parameters (p > 0.05), and reported adverse events (p = 0.916). Furthermore, none of the patients developed anti-liraglutide antibodies.

The biosimilar liraglutide (Melitide®) was noninferior in efficacy and comparable in safety when compared with the reference liraglutide.

NCT03421119.

(1) Background: Oral semaglutide represents the first oral GLP-1 RA approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This real-world retrospective study aimed at evaluating its effectiveness and tolerability in the treatment of patients with T2DM when patients switched from a glucose-lowering agent to it and when it was added to the usual therapy. (2) Methods: Adult patients with T2DM taking oral semaglutide and followed in the ASUGI Diabetes Center were identified with the use of electronic medical records between October 2022 and May 2023. (3) Results: A total of 129 patients were recruited. The median follow-up was 6 months. Be it as a switchover or as an add-on therapy, oral semaglutide significantly reduced HbA1c and BMI. Switching from DPPIV inhibitors to oral semaglutide was associated with a significant reduction in HbA1c and BMI, switching from SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with a significant reduction in HbA1c, and switching from sulphonylureas was associated with a significant reduction in BMI. The median HbA1c change was associated with baseline HbA1c. SBP significantly decreased in the add-on group. Oral semaglutide was well tolerated. (4) Conclusions: This study shows that in the real-world setting, oral semaglutide is effective and safe as a switchover or as an add-on therapy for the treatment of T2DM.

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) is a potent modulator of cholesterol metabolism and plays a crucial role in the normal functioning of pancreatic islets and the progression of diabetes. Islet autocrine PCSK9 deficiency can lead to the enrichment of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor (LDLR) and excessive LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) uptake, subsequently impairing the insulin secretion in β-cells. Circulatory PCSK9 levels are primarily attributed to hepatocyte secretion. Notably, anti-PCSK9 strategies proposed for individuals with hypercholesterolemia chiefly target liver-derived PCSK9; however, these anti-PCSK9 strategies have been associated with the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM). In the current review, we highlight a new direction in PCSK9 inhibition therapy strategies: screening candidates for anti-PCSK9 from the drugs used in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treatment. We explored the association between circulating, local pancreatic PCSK9 and T2DM, as well as the relationship between PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies and NODM. We discussed the emergence of artificial and natural drugs in recent years, exhibiting dual benefits of antidiabetic activity and PCSK9 reduction, confirming that the diverse effects of these drugs may potentially impact the progression of diabetes and associated disorders, thereby introducing novel avenues and methodologies to enhance disease prognosis.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic metabolic disorder, with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) significantly impacting the cardiovascular (CV) system. Our comprehensive study on the cardiovascular effects of liraglutide, conducted concurrently with the formulation of diabetes treatment guidelines, aims to provide healthcare providers and patients with reassurance regarding the safety and effectiveness of liraglutide. From the beginning until August 20, 2023, we conducted searches in databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Google Scholar. These searches aimed to identify studies comparing liraglutide to control in terms of symptom resolution among patients with T2DM. For all relevant outcomes, we calculated risk ratios along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Thirteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this analysis. The results demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction, CV mortality, and all-cause mortality. No significant difference was found between the liraglutide and control groups for the outcome of stroke. However, sensitivity analysis revealed a significant reduction in the risk of stroke among patients taking liraglutide. Our comprehensive meta-analysis strongly supports the use of liraglutide for managing cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to its established safety and effectiveness. Further RCTs and meta-analyses are needed to more thoroughly evaluate liraglutide's therapeutic potential, with the aim of enhancing the quality of life for those with CVD.

This study aimed to perform a network meta-analysis to objectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of 10 Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in combination with metformin that is approved for use worldwide in patients with type 2 diabetes and to provide evidence-based support and reference for the selection of clinical treatment.

Three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were searched from their respective inception until September 30, 2022. Only randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy and safety of GLP-1RAs for treating type 2 diabetes (T2D) were included. The 10 GLP-1RAs are exenatide (including exenatide twice daily and once weekly), liraglutide, lixisenatide, dulaglutide, PEX168, semaglutide (subcutaneous and oral semaglutide), tirzepatide and albiglutide.

34 RCTs with 10 GLP-1RAs and 12993 patients were included in the Network Meta-Analysis (NMA). According to the NMA, tirzepatide 15 mg, semaglutide 1.0 mg, PEX168-200μg, oral semaglutide 14 and dulaglutide 1.5 mg reduced HbA1c by -2.23%, -1.57%, -1.12%, -1.10%, -1.09% and body weight by -11.33 kg, -5.99 kg, +0.40 kg, -3.95 kg, -1.87 kg, respectively. There was no significant difference in the rate of adverse events for tirzepatide 15 mg, oral-semaglutide 14 mg, and semaglutide 1.0 mg. PEX168-200μg, tirzepatide 15mg, and oral semaglutide 14mg had Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking (SUCRA) values greater than placebo, and only tirzepatide 15mg and oral semaglutide 14mg were significantly different from placebo in the rate of serious adverse events. All GLP-1RA did not lead to increased incidence of hypoglycemia. Albiglutide 30mg and semaglutide 1.0mg significantly differed from placebo in Adverse Event (AE) withdrawal. Finally, the sensitivity analysis and publication bias analysis results indicate that the study results are reliable.

This study's results showed that GLP-1RAs were effective in lowering HbA1c and reducing body weight without increased incidence of hypoglycemic reactions. In addition, this study may provide reference and evidence-based medical evidence for clinicians to select GLP-1RAs in patients with T2D and high body mass index (BMI). Based on the NMA results, tirzepatide 15mg and semaglutide 1.0mg may be preferred.

The gastrointestinal tract hosts the largest ecosystem of microorganisms in the body. The metabolism of ingested nutrients by gut bacteria produces novel chemical mediators that can influence chemosensory cells lining the gastrointestinal tract. Specifically, hormone-releasing enteroendocrine cells which express a host of receptors activated by these bacterial metabolites. This review will focus on the activation mechanisms of glucagon-like peptide-1 releasing enteroendocrine cells by the three main bacterial metabolites produced in the gut: short-chain fatty acids, secondary bile acids and indoles. Given the importance of enteroendocrine cells in regulating glucose homeostasis and food intake, we will also discuss therapies based on these bacterial metabolites used in the treatment of metabolic diseases such as diabetes and obesity. Elucidating the mechanisms gut bacteria can influence cellular function in the host will advance our understanding of this fundamental symbiotic relationship and unlock the potential of harnessing these pathways to improve human health.

Obesity is a chronic disease with high prevalence and associated comorbidities, making it a growing global concern. These comorbidities include type 2 diabetes, hypertension, ventilatory dysfunction, arthrosis, venous and lymphatic circulation diseases, depression, and others, which have a negative impact on health and increase morbidity and mortality. GLP-1 agonists, used to treat type 2 diabetes, have been shown to be effective in promoting weight loss in preclinical and clinical studies. This review summarizes numerous studies conducted on the main drugs in the GLP-1 agonists class, outlining the maximum achievable weight loss. Our aim is to emphasize the active role and main outcomes of GLP-1 agonists in promoting weight loss, as well as in improving hyperglycemia, insulin sensitivity, blood pressure, cardio-metabolic, and renal protection. We highlight the pleiotropic effects of these medications, along with their indications, contraindications, and precautions for both diabetic and non-diabetic patients, based on long-term follow-up studies.

Emerging evidence supports that dihydroceramides (DhCer) and ceramides (Cer) contribute to the pathophysiology of insulin resistance and liver steatosis, and that their circulating concentrations are independently associated with cardiovascular outcomes. Circulating DhCer levels are increased in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). On the other hand, the GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide reduces major adverse cardiac events, insulin resistance and liver steatosis in T2D patients. The main purpose of the present study was therefore to investigate whether liraglutide decreases circulating levels of DhCer and Cer in T2D patients, which could be a mechanism involved in its cardiometabolic benefits. The secondary purpose was to assess the relationship between liraglutide-induced changes in DhCer/Cer levels and insulin resistance and liver steatosis.

Plasma concentrations of 11 DhCer and 15 Cer species were measured by a highly-sensitive mass spectrometry system in 35 controls and 86 T2D patients before and after 6 months of liraglutide (1.2 mg/day). Insulin resistance was estimated by the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index. Liver fat content (LFC) was assessed in 53 patients by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Plasma levels of total DhCer, 7 DhCer and 7 Cer species were increased in T2D patients compared to controls. Liraglutide decreased total DhCer by 15.1% (p = 0.005), affecting 16:0 (p = 0.037), 18:0 (p < 0.0001), 18:1 (p = 0.0005), 20:0 (p = 0.0003), 23:0 (p = 0.005) and 24:1 (p = 0.04) species. Total plasma Cer did not significantly change after liraglutide (p = 0.18), but 5 Cer species decreased significantly, i.e. 18:0 and 18:1 (both p < 0.0001), 19:0 and 24:1 (both p < 0.01) and 26:1 (p = 0.04). In multivariate analysis, the reduction in DhCer after liraglutide was independently associated with the reduction in LFC (p = 0.0005) and in TyG index (p = 0.05).

Liraglutide reduces plasma levels of numerous DhCer and Cer species in T2D patients, which may contribute to the cardiovascular benefit observed in the LEADER trial. The independent association between the decrease in plasma DhCer level with the reduction in LFC and TyG index adds new insights regarding the relationship between DhCer, liver steatosis and insulin resistance. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02721888.

Obesity is a complex metabolic condition that can have a negative impact on one's health and even result in mortality. The management of obesity has been addressed in a number of ways, including lifestyle changes, medication using appetite suppressants and thermogenics, and bariatric surgery for individuals who are severely obese. Liraglutide and semaglutide are two of the five Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved anti-obesity drugs that are FDA-approved agents for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. In order to highlight the positive effects of these drugs as anti-obesity treatments, we analyzed the weight loss effects of T2DM agents that have demonstrated weight loss effects in this study by evaluating clinical studies that were published for each agent. Many clinical studies have revealed that some antihyperglycemic medications can help people lose weight, while others either cause weight gain or neutral results. Acarbose has mild weight loss effects and metformin and sodium-dependent glucose cotransporter proteins-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have modest weight loss effects; however, some glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists had the greatest impact on weight loss. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors showed a neutral or mild weight loss effect. To sum up, some of the GLP-1 agonist drugs show promise as weight-loss treatments.

To assess the in-market use of Saxenda (liraglutide 3.0 mg) and Victoza (liraglutide 1.2 mg/1.8 mg) according to approved indications and posology.

This retrospective, non-interventional study was conducted at 41 sites from December 2016 to May 2019. Via medical record review, physicians at each site identified patients who had been prescribed Saxenda (Italy) or Victoza (Italy/Germany) within the 24 months following launch in each country. Pseudonymized data were abstracted on patient and site characteristics, indication for the prescription, posology and duration of usage. Adherence to the approved indications and posology, and to the Saxenda stopping rule, were assessed. No formal statistical analysis was performed.

A total of 440 patients were prescreened and 225 (51.1%) were enrolled (Saxenda: N = 75, all in Italy; Victoza: N = 75 in Italy and N = 75 in Germany). In all, 96% (72/75) of Saxenda prescriptions, and 98.7% (148/150) of Victoza, were in accordance with the approved indications. Among the 40 patients treated with Saxenda for 16 weeks or longer, only two (5.0%) were confirmed as non-adherent to the stopping rule. Adherence could not be assessed in 23 (57.5%) patients because of missing body weight measurements.

This retrospective, real-world post-authorization safety study provides reassurance that Saxenda and Victoza are primarily used according to the approved European label, thus their real-world utilization did not raise safety concerns.

Our work is aimed at unraveling the role of the first-phase insulin secretion in the natural history of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its interrelationship with insulin resistance and with β cell function and mass. Starting from pathophysiology, we investigate the impact of impaired secretion on glucose homeostasis and explore postmeal hyperglycemia as the main clinical feature, underlining its relevance in the management of the disease. We also review dietary and pharmacological approaches aimed at improving early secretory defects and restoring residual β cell function. Furthermore, we discuss possible approaches to detect early secretory defects in clinical practice. By providing a journey through human and animal data, we attempt a unification of the recent evidence in an effort to offer a new outlook on β cell secretion.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) is a critical therapeutic target for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The GLP-1R cellular signaling mechanism relevant to insulin secretion and blood glucose regulation has been extensively studied. Numerous drugs targeting GLP-1R have entered clinical treatment. However, novel functional molecules with reduced side effects and enhanced therapeutic efficacy are still in high demand. In this review, we summarize the basis of GLP-1R cellular signaling, and how it is involved in the treatment of T2DM. We review the functional molecules of incretin therapy in various stages of clinical trials. We also outline the current strategies and emerging techniques that are furthering the development of novel therapeutic drugs for T2DM and other metabolic diseases.

Liraglutide can effectively reduce the weight of patients with type 2 diabetes. Nonetheless, its weight loss effect was highly heterogeneous in different patients in the clinical practice.

To identify the factors most associated with the weight loss effect of liraglutide in obese or overweight patients with type 2 diabetes with poorly controlled oral medication in northeast China.

A prospective study.

A prospective study was performed in subjects with type 2 diabetes who were taking oral medication and had a body mass index (BMI) of ⩾24 kg/m². Liraglutide was administered for at least 12 weeks, while the original hypoglycemic regimen was kept unchanged (Phase I). Later, liraglutide treatment was continued or stopped as necessary or as subjects thought fit in the 13-52 weeks that followed (Phase II), and the potential factors affecting the effect of weight loss of liraglutide were analyzed.

Of the 127 recruited subjects, 90 had comprehensive follow-up data at week 12. In Phase I, the subjects' blood sugar levels and weight decreased significantly(P < 0.001). Among all the significant factors, the gastrointestinal adverse reactions score (GARS) was more correlated with BMI change (ΔBMI; r = 0.43) and waist circumference change (ΔWC; r = 0.32) than the baseline BMI (BMI₀) and WC (WC₀). At week 12, linear regression showed that BMI₀ independently affected ΔBMI and ΔWC, whereas WC₀ only affected ΔWC. The GARS was significantly associated with ΔBMI and ΔWC, and this association continued until week 52, even after most subjects had discontinued liraglutide treatment.

The degree of obesity and gastrointestinal adverse reactions were the most promising predictors of weight loss in liraglutide treatment.

To evaluate the treatment effect Fand pharmacoeconomic value of Dugaglutide in women with type 2 diabetes.

Women (n=96) with type 2 diabetes recruited from June 2019 to December 2021 were randomized into two equal groups. The control group was treated with Liraglutide, and the observation group was treated with Dulaglutide, both for 24 weeks. The blood glucose levels, biochemical index, insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR), cost-effect ratio (CER), and drug safety were determined and compared between the two groups.

Blood glucose levels, the biochemical index, and HOMA-IR were lower in both groups after the treatment (P < 0.05), and there was no statistical difference in the blood glucose levels, biochemical index and HOMA-IR between the two groups (P > 0.05). The CER levels did not differ statistically between the two groups (P > 0.05). Both the cost and the incidence of drug side effects during solution injection were lower in the observation group than in the control group after 24 weeks of treatment (P < 0.05).

Both Dulaglutide and Liraglutide can reduce blood glucose levels, improve biochemical index, and HOMA-IR levels in women with type 2 diabetes. Dulaglutide is more cost-effective and safe.

https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx, identifier ChiCTR1900026514.

Insulin resistance (IR) is one of the common pathological manifestations of metabolic-related diseases, and the prevalence of relevant diseases is high. Acupuncture is beneficial to IR patients, but the central mechanism underlying this treatment remains unclear. This study provides mechanistic insights into how electroacupuncture (EA) improves IR through the response of Pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) neurons to adiponectin (Adipo).

Glucose tolerance tests (GTT), Insulin tolerance tests (ITT) and fasting blood glucose (FBG) were detected by glucometer. Serum insulin, Adipo and skeletal muscle adiponectin receptor 1 (AdipoR1) protein levels were examined by ELISA. Homeostasis model assessment estimated insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated using the following formula: HOMA-IR = fasting insulin (FINS) (mU/L) × FBG (mmol/L)/22.5. The expression levels of AdipoR1 and Adipo mRNA in skeletal muscle were detected by real-time PCR quantification. The co-marking of c-Fos/AdipoR1 and POMC neurons were investigated using immunofluorescence. Spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents (sEPSCs) of POMC neurons and the response of POMC neurons to Adipo were detected via electrophysiology.

EA significantly ameliorated HFD-induced impairment of GTT, ITT, FBG, and HOMA-IR which was correlated with recovery of the expression level of AdipoR1 and Adipo in skeletal muscle. The improved response of POMC neurons to Adipo in the hypothalamus may be a key factor in correcting abnormal glucose tolerance and improving IR.

This study demonstrates that EA can ameliorate HFD-induced impaired glucose tolerance through improved response of POMC neurons to Adipo in the hypothalamus, providing insight into the central mechanism of improving IR through EA.

Liraglutide is a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist prescribed to diabetic patients for glycaemic control. To understand the impact of liraglutide in the real-world setting, this study analysed its effects in a Portuguese cohort of Type 2 diabetes patients. This was an observational, multicentric, and retrospective study that included 191 liraglutide-treated patients with at least 12 months of treatment. Patients’ data were collected and analysed during a 24-month follow-up period. Overall, liraglutide treatment effectively reduced HbA1c levels from 8.3% to around 7.5%, after 6, 12, and 24 months (p < 0.001). In fact, 38.2%, 37.2%, and 44.8% of patients at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively, experienced an HbA1c reduction of at least 1%. Moreover, a persistent reduction in anthropometric features was also observed, with 44.0%, 47.6%, and 54.4% of patients achieving a weight reduction of at least 3% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Finally, significant improvements were observed in the HDL-c and LDL-c levels. Our results demonstrate that liraglutide effectively promoted the reduction of HbA1c values during routine clinical practice, which was sustained throughout the study. In addition, there were significant improvements in anthropometric parameters and other cardiovascular risk factors.

The objective of this clinical practice guideline is to provide updated and new evidence-based recommendations for the comprehensive care of persons with diabetes mellitus to clinicians, diabetes-care teams, other health care professionals and stakeholders, and individuals with diabetes and their caregivers.

The American Association of Clinical Endocrinology selected a task force of medical experts and staff who updated and assessed clinical questions and recommendations from the prior 2015 version of this guideline and conducted literature searches for relevant scientific papers published from January 1, 2015, through May 15, 2022. Selected studies from results of literature searches composed the evidence base to update 2015 recommendations as well as to develop new recommendations based on review of clinical evidence, current practice, expertise, and consensus, according to established American Association of Clinical Endocrinology protocol for guideline development.

This guideline includes 170 updated and new evidence-based clinical practice recommendations for the comprehensive care of persons with diabetes. Recommendations are divided into four sections: (1) screening, diagnosis, glycemic targets, and glycemic monitoring; (2) comorbidities and complications, including obesity and management with lifestyle, nutrition, and bariatric surgery, hypertension, dyslipidemia, retinopathy, neuropathy, diabetic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease; (3) management of prediabetes, type 2 diabetes with antihyperglycemic pharmacotherapy and glycemic targets, type 1 diabetes with insulin therapy, hypoglycemia, hospitalized persons, and women with diabetes in pregnancy; (4) education and new topics regarding diabetes and infertility, nutritional supplements, secondary diabetes, social determinants of health, and virtual care, as well as updated recommendations on cancer risk, nonpharmacologic components of pediatric care plans, depression, education and team approach, occupational risk, role of sleep medicine, and vaccinations in persons with diabetes.

This updated clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations to assist with person-centered, team-based clinical decision-making to improve the care of persons with diabetes mellitus.

As obesity prevalence increases, more and more drugs that assist with weight loss have been developed. Numerous weight loss drugs had been approved, but many have also been withdrawn based on their lack of efficacy as well as safety concerns. Initial approaches in developing weight loss drugs was by increasing physiological energy expenditure and suppressing the appetite. Subsequently, as more physiological mechanisms for weight gain has been unearthed, drugs targeting newly discovered receptors and/or enzymes have been introduced with improved safety profiles and fewer psychological adverse events. Additionally, drugs targeting hunger or satiety signaling have been actively studied, and have shown increased adoption by physicians. Studies have also evaluated drugs that target metabolic tissues-such as adipose tissue or muscle-to promote weight loss, however to-date nothing has carried on into clinical practice. Starting with a brief history of early obesity treatments, this review evaluates current weight loss pharmaceutical options based on their duration of therapy status.

In this post-hoc analysis of data from a randomised clinical trial, we compared the effect of liraglutide to placebo on markers of insulin secretion in persons with type 2 diabetes treated with multiple daily insulin injections. Liraglutide increased insulin secretion, measured by C-peptide, by 19% after 24 weeks of treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT 2012-001941-42.

To compare (in the LIRA-PRIME [NCT02730377], a randomized open-label trial), the efficacy of liraglutide in controlling glycaemia versus an oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (T2D), despite metformin use in a primary care setting (n = 219 sites, n = 9 countries).

Adults (n = 1991) with T2D (HbA1c 7.5%-9.0%) receiving metformin were randomized 1:1 to liraglutide (≤1.8 mg/d) or one OAD, selected by the investigator, added to metformin, for up to 104 weeks. Primary endpoint: time to inadequate glycaemic control (HbA1c > 7.0%) at two scheduled consecutive visits after week 26. Outcomes were assessed for liraglutide versus a pooled OAD group, and (post hoc) liraglutide versus sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, and sulphonylureas individually.

Among randomized patients (liraglutide, n = 996; OAD, n = 995), 47.6% were female, mean age was 57.4 years and mean HbA1c was 8.2%. Median time to inadequate glycaemic control was 44 weeks longer with liraglutide versus OAD (109 weeks [25% percentile, 38; 75% percentile, not available] vs. 65 weeks [25% percentile, 35; 75% percentile, 107], P < .0001). Changes in HbA1c and body weight at week 104 or at premature treatment discontinuation significantly favoured liraglutide over OAD. Hypoglycaemia rates were comparable between groups and few patients discontinued because of adverse events (liraglutide, 7.9% [n = 79]; OAD, 4.1% [n = 41]). Similar results were observed in the post hoc analysis for liraglutide versus individual OAD classes.

Glycaemic control was better maintained with liraglutide versus OAD, supporting liraglutide use when intensifying therapy in primary care patients with T2D.