Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Feb 16, 2021; 9(5): 1026-1036
Published online Feb 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i5.1026
Published online Feb 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i5.1026
BCR group, n = 25 (52%) | Non-BCR group, n = 23 (48%) | P value | |
Age (yr) (mean ± SD) | 66.5 (SD: 4.7) | 69 (SD: 5.4) | 0.102 |
Body weight (kg) (mean ± SD) | 70.8 (SD: 7.5) | 71.1 (SD: 6.8) | 0.711 |
Body height (cm) (mean ± SD) | 167.5 (SD: 3.6) | 166.9 (SD: 3.3) | 0.718 |
ASA grade (n) | 0.818 | ||
I | 5 (20%) | 4 (17.4%) | |
II | 20 (80%) | 19 (82.6%) | |
Surgical method: RARP with: | |||
BPLND | 24 (96%) | 22 (96%) | 0.954 |
Bilateral NVB preservation | 20 (80%) | 19 (82.6%) | 0.818 |
DVC ligation | 9 (36%) | 7 (30.4%) | 0.681 |
Bladder neck sparing | 25 (100%) | 23 (100%) | |
Puboprostatic ligament preservation | 0.705 | ||
1 | 3 (12%) | 2 (8.7%) | |
2 | 22 (88%) | 21 (91.3%) | |
Lymph node yield number (n) (mean ± SD) | 11.6 (SD: 6.3) | 9.8 (SD: 4.5) | 0.143 |
Vesicourethral anastomosis | 17.2 (SD: 4.0) | 17.4 (SD: 5.9) | 0.447 |
Time (min) (mean ± SD) | 109.2 (SD: 24.7) | 111.4 (SD: 24.5) | 0.386 |
Operation time (min) (mean ± SD) | 82.7 (SD: 66.2) | 102.17 (SD: 112.0) | 0.242 |
Blood loss (mL) (mean ± SD) | 51.0 (SD: 36.3) | 41.7 (SD: 11.5) | 0.116 |
Specimen volume (g) (mean ± SD) | 7.0 (SD: 5.7) | 4.9 (SD: 3.4) | 0.074 |
Tumor volume (cm3) (mean ± SD) | 15.1 (SD: 9.8) | 12.8 (SD: 9.5) | 0.203 |
Tumor percentage (%) (mean ± SD) | |||
PSM location: | 13 (52%) | 10 (43.5%) | 0.848 |
Anterior | 3 (12%) | 3 (13.0%) | |
Lateral | 1 (4%) | 3 (13.0%) | |
Posterolateral | 7 (28%)1 | 6 (26.1%)2 | |
Apex | 1 (4%) | 1 (4.4%) | |
Posterior | 3.6 (SD: 0.9) | 4.3 (SD: 2.0) | 0.080 |
Postoperative stay (d) (mean ± SD) | 7.0 (SD: 0.2) | 7.2 (SD: 0.7) | 0.119 |
Foley catheter (d) (mean ± SD) | 28.6 (SD: 19.9) | 17.0 (SD: 11.3) | < 0.001 |
Preoperative PSA (ng/mL) (mean ± SD) | |||
Preoperative PSA distribution (n) | 3 (12%) | 6 (26.1%) | |
< 10 ng/mL | 9 (3%) | 11 (47.8%) | 0.157 |
≥ 10 ng/mL, < 20 ng/mL | 13 (52%) | 6 (26.1%) | |
≥ 20 ng/mL | 4.3 (SD: 2.8)/10.1 (SD: 2.0) | 4.1 (SD: 2.5)/10.5 (SD: 1.9) | |
Positive biopsy cores (mean ± SD) | 0.832 | ||
Biopsy tumor percentage (%) (mean ± SD) | 26.5 (SD: 21.2) | 24.0 (SD: 20.3) | 0.686 |
Biopsy core | 0.839 | ||
< 3 fragments | 7 (31.8%) | 5 (23.8%) | |
≥ 3 fragments, < 50% | 12 (54.6%) | 13 (61.9%) | |
≥ 50% | 3 (13.6%) | 3 (14.3%) | |
Biopsy Gleason group | 0.626 | ||
1 | 12 (48.0%) | 10 (43.5%) | |
2 | 4 (16.0%) | 4 (17.4%) | |
3 | 1 (4.0%) | 4 (17.4%) | |
4 | 3 (12.0%) | 2 (8.7%) | |
5 | 5 (20.0%) | 3 (13.0%) | |
Clinical stage | 0.445 | ||
cT1 | 4 (16%) | 3 (13.0%) | |
cT2a | 2 (8.0%) | 1 (4.4%) | |
cT2b | 7 (28%) | 5 (21.7%) | |
cT2c | 8 (32%) | 13 (56.5%) | |
cT3 | 4 (16%) | 1 (4.4%) | |
Risk category | 0.493 | ||
Very low and low | 1 (4.0%) | 4 (17.4%) | |
Favored-intermediate | 8 (32.0%) | 6 (26.1%) | |
Unfavored-intermediate | 2 (8.0%) | 4 (17.4%) | |
High | 10 (40.0%) | 7 (30.4%) | |
Very high | 4 (16.0%) | 2 (8.7%) | |
PNI | 0.061 | ||
Positive | 22 (88.0%) | 15 (65.2%) | |
Negative | 3 (12.0%) | 8 (34.8%) | |
ALI | N/A | ||
Positive | 2 (8.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
Negative | 23 (92.0%) | 23 (100%) | |
Pathological Gleason group | 0.265 | ||
< 3 | 17 (73.9%) | 20 (87%) | |
≥ 3 | 6 (26.1%) | 3 (13.0%) | |
Pathological primary Gleason score | 0.265 | ||
< 3 | 17 (73.9%) | 20 (87%) | |
≥ 3 | 6 (26.1%) | 3 (13.0%) | |
Change of Gleason group | 0.943 | ||
Upgrade | 9 (39.1%) | 8 (34.8%) | |
Same | 6 (26.1) | 6 (26.1%) | |
Downgrade | 8 (34.8%) | 9 (39.1%) |
Year | Sample size | Surgical method | PSA level (ng/mL) | Clinical TNM stage | Pathology Gleason group | BCR rate | |
Freedland et al[1] | 2003 | Retrospective, 214 men, SEARCH Database | RP (no mention of open RP or RARP) | Mean: 10.5 ± 8.6, median: 8.0 | T1: 97 (46%); T2: 110 (53%); T3: 3 (1%) | 1: 105 (51%); 2 and 3: 89 (43%); 4 and 5: 14 (7%) | 6-yr BCR rate 50% |
Leite et al[19] | 2014 | Retrospective, 58 men | Open RP | N/M | N/M | N/M | Mean follow-up: 35.9 ± 23.1 mo; BCR rate: 31% |
Hashimoto et al[12] | 2015 | Retrospective, 837 men | RARP | 6.90, range: 3-47.4 | T1c: 634 (75.7%); T2a: 111 (13.3%); T2b: 46 (5.5%); T2c: 39 (4.7%); T3: 7 (0.8%) | 1: 65 (7.8%); 2: 377 (45%); 3: 230 (26.2%); 4 and 5: 165 (19.7%) | 5-yr BCR free-survival: 62.4% |
Karl et al[13] | 2015 | Retrospective, 956 men | Retropubic RP: 88%; Laparoscopic RP: 6%; RARP: 4%; Perineal RP: 3% | < 4: 13%; 4-9.9: 65%; 10-19.9: 18%; ≥ 20: 4% | N/M | 1: 39%; 2: 52%; 3: 7%; 4 and 5: 2% | Mean follow-up: 48 mo; BCR rate: 25.4% |
- Citation: Yang CH, Lin YS, Ou YC, Weng WC, Huang LH, Lu CH, Hsu CY, Tung MC. Biochemical recurrence of pathological T2+ localized prostate cancer after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A 10-year surveillance. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(5): 1026-1036
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i5/1026.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i5.1026