Wang JY, Zhang L, Liu J, Yang W, Ma LN. Metabolic syndrome, ApoE genotype, and cognitive dysfunction in an elderly population: A single-center, case-control study. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(5): 1005-1015 [PMID: 33644164 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i5.1005]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Wei Yang, MD, Chief Doctor, Department of Geriatrics, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Medicine, No. 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100053, China. yangw_79@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Geriatrics & Gerontology
Article-Type of This Article
Case Control Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Feb 16, 2021; 9(5): 1005-1015 Published online Feb 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i5.1005
Table 1 Baseline study characteristics in elderly patients with vs without metabolic syndrome
Control, n = 102
MS, n = 100
t/χ2
P value
Mean age (years)
75.32 ± 7.55
76.45 ± 6.90
0.443
0.506
Male, n (%)
66 (64.7)
67 (67.0)
0.118
0.731
Educated, n (%)
95 (93.1)
89 (89.0)
1.065
0.302
Intelligent working, n (%)
90 (88.2)
80 (80.0)
2.569
0.109
Living alone, n (%)
10 (9.8)
14 (14.0)
0.849
0.357
Current smoking, n (%)
40 (39.2)
47 (47.0)
1.248
0.264
Alcohol drinking, n (%)
14 (13.7)
18 (18.0)
0.692
0.405
Systolic BP (mmHg)
121.00 ± 11.29
150.30 ± 14.50
8.032
0.005
Diastolic BP (mmHg)
71.68 ± 6.82
78.57 ± 8.42
5.304
0.022
Waist circumference (cm)
82.64 ± 6.87
93.44 ± 8.48
5.529
0.020
BMI (kg/m2)
22.88 ± 2.76
26.39 ± 2.37
3.583
0.060
FPG (mmoL/L)
6.09 ± 1.54
7.73 ± 2.03
5.581
0.019
FINS (mIU/L)
10.46 ± 5.34
14.46 ± 6.67
5.188
0.024
HOMA-IR
2.96 ± 2.02
5.17 ± 3.40
17.449
< 0.001
HbA1c (%)
3.71 ± 1.53
4.67 ± 1.91
5.749
0.017
ALT (IU/L)
19.98 ± 10.20
22.04 ± 11.51
1.119
0.292
ALB (g/L)
37.97 ± 4.98
38.49 ± 4.28
0.721
0.580
SCr (μmoL/L)
80.72 ± 20.31
79.94 ± 21.86
1.316
0.253
UA (μmoL/L)
327.64 ± 92.27
325.86 ± 90.06
0.014
0.907
TG (mmoL/L)
1.50 ± 0.74
2.20 ± 1.10
4.069
0.045
TC (mmoL/L)
3.86 ± 0.84
4.14 ± 1.14
4.471
0.031
LDL-C (mmoL/L)
2.10 ± 0.70
2.60 ± 0.84
3.632
0.058
HDL-C (mmoL/L)
1.55 ± 0.52
1.28 ± 0.38
-1.706
0.003
HCY (μmoL/L)
13.41 ± 4.90
13.95 ± 4.54
1.743
0.188
MMSE scale
25.93 ± 3.26
21.50 ± 4.51
11.268
0.001
ADL score
90.25 ± 14.20
82.30 ± 16.06
4.038
0.046
Cognitive dysfunction, n (%)
39 (38.2)
64 (64.0)
13.413
< 0.001
ApoEε4 allele, n (%)
12 (11.8)
21 (21.0)
3.151
0.076
Table 2 Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and ApoEε4 in patients with vs without cognitive dysfunction
Normal cognitive function, n = 99
Cognitive dysfunction, n = 103
χ2 value
P value
MetS, n (%)
36 (36.4)
64 (62.1)
13.413
< 0.001
ApoEε4, n (%)
10 (10.1)
23 (22.3)
5.523
0.019
Table 3 The association between clinical variables and cognitive dysfunction from the results of logistic regression analyses
Variables
β
SE
Wald
P value
OR
MetS
1.573
0.894
4.215
0.038
2.771
HOMA-IR
1.144
0.510
5.037
0.025
3.140
ApoE ε4
1.765
0.798
4.896
0.027
5.844
Systolic BP (mmHg)
0.068
0.030
4.935
0.026
1.070
Waist circumference (cm)
0.270
0.072
13.864
< 0.001
1.131
Table 4 Potential correlations between metabolic syndrome and ApoEε4 and temporal changes in cognitive dysfunction during 1-year follow-up: Results of the repeated-measure analysis of variance
Team
n
F/P values (time)
F/P values (time × team)
F/P values (team)
MetS
Yes; No
100, 102
324.15/< 0.001
96.57/< 0.001
86.43/< 0.001
ApoE ε4
Yes; No
33, 169
351.94/< 0.001
77.90/< 0.001
24.65/< 0.001
Citation: Wang JY, Zhang L, Liu J, Yang W, Ma LN. Metabolic syndrome, ApoE genotype, and cognitive dysfunction in an elderly population: A single-center, case-control study. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(5): 1005-1015