Zhao X, Meng J, Dai J, Yin ZT. Effect of biofeedback combined with high-quality nursing in treatment of functional constipation. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(4): 784-791 [PMID: 33585624 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i4.784]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Zhi-Tao Yin, MSc, Chief Physician, Department of Anorectal Disease, Shenyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 23 Sanhao Street, Shenyang 110000, Liaoning Province, China. yinzitao@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Nursing
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Feb 6, 2021; 9(4): 784-791 Published online Feb 6, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i4.784
Table 1 General patient information
Items
Control group, n = 50
Experimental group, n = 50
t value
P value
Age in yr
55.3 ± 7.3
54.7 ± 3.6
0.521
> 0.05
Gender, F/M
28/22
29/21
Disease course in yr
6.34 ± 4.31
6.23 ± 4.35
0.127
> 0.05
Table 2 Scoring criteria for constipation symptoms
Score, points
Defecation frequency, times/d
Defecation time in min
Defecation exertion
Incomplete defection
Stool shape
0
1-2
< 5
Easy
No
B4-7
1
2-3
5-15
Force required
Mild (occasionally)
B3
2
3-5
15-30
Excessive force required
Moderate (often)
B2
3
≥ 5
≥ 30
Kaiserol or hand required to help defecate
Severe (frequently)
B1
Table 3 Bristol standard classification
B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
B7
Scattered and hard
Sausage-like clumps
Dry and cracked sausage-like
Smooth and soft sausage-like
Soft and lumpy
Mushy stool
Watery stool
Table 4 Scores of constipation symptoms before and after treatment
Control, n = 50
Experiment, n = 50
Defecation
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
t value
P value
Frequency
2.25 ± 0.71
0.92 ± 0.43
2.27 ± 0.52
0.67 ± 0.58
2.448
< 0.05
Time
2.33 ± 0.26
0.83 ± 0.27
2.31 ± 0.41
0.58 ± 0. 63
2.579
< 0.05
Exertion
2.30 ± 0.39
1.07 ± 0.15
2.28 ± 0.43
1.01 ± 0.12
2.209
< 0.05
Incomplete
2.01 ± 0.55
1.13 ± 0.21
2.02 ± 0.46
1.05 ± 0.17
2.094
< 0.05
Hand-assisted
2.35 ± 0.31
0.46 ± 0.52
2.37 ± 0.12
0.31 ± 0.10
2.003
< 0.05
Table 5 Anorectal pressure measurement before and after treatment
Items, mmHg
Control, n = 50
Experiment, n = 50
t value
P value
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Anal canal resting pressure
63.25 ± 13.86
46.92 ± 13.43
63.27 ± 12.52
41.37 ± 11.58
2.213
< 0.05
Maximum systolic pressure
104.93 ± 32.18
122.71 ± 33.15
105.1 ± 31.93
127.62 ± 32.87
-0.737
< 0.05
Initial defecation threshold
75.31 ± 24.42
58.89 ± 15.15
76.33 ± 25.06
53.28 ± 12.23
2.037
< 0.05
Table 6 Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and Self-Rating Depression Scale scores before and after treatment
Items
Control, n = 50
Experiment, n = 50
t value
P value
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
SAS
47.61 ± 10.37
37.22 ± 11.32
46.31 ± 11.72
32.61 ± 10.18
2.141
< 0.05
SDS
53.54 ± 9.76
46.18 ± 10.7
51.51 ± 10.57
40.82 ± 11.12
2.456
< 0.05
Table 7 Patient satisfaction score
Group (n)
Satisfaction score
t value
P value
Experiment (50)
98.21 ± 2.56
13.897
< 0.05
Control (50)
89.83 ± 3.41
Citation: Zhao X, Meng J, Dai J, Yin ZT. Effect of biofeedback combined with high-quality nursing in treatment of functional constipation. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(4): 784-791