Shen HC, Wang H, Sun B, Jiang LZ, Meng Q. Birthing ball on promoting cervical ripening and its influence on the labor process and the neonatal blood gas index. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(36): 11330-11337 [PMID: 35071563 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i36.11330]
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Dec 26, 2021; 9(36): 11330-11337 Published online Dec 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i36.11330
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data between the two groups of mothers
Group
n
Age (yr)
Pregnancy times (times)
Parity (times)
Average height (cm)
Prenatal BMI
Induced labor pregnancy week (wk)
Delivery ball group
100
27.7 ± 3.0
2.85 ± 1.30
0.89 ± 0.40
160.2 ± 4.4
28.9 ± 2.4
40.0 ± 1.1
Regular group
100
28.0 ± 2.9
3.01 ± 1.43
0.93 ± 0.38
159.8 ± 4.0
29.2 ± 2.0
39.9 ± 0.9
t
-0.719
-0.828
-0.725
0.673
-0.960
0.704
P value
0.473
0.409
0.469
0.502
0.338
0.483
Table 2 Comparison of cervical Bishop score between birthing ball group and conventional group (mean ± SD, points)
Group
n
Before intervention
After the intervention
t
P value
Delivery ball group
100
3.71 ± 1.10
7.84 ± 1.52
-22.012
0.000
Regular group
100
3.50 ± 1.25
7.32 ± 1.29
-21.266
0.000
t
1.261
2.608
P value
0.209
0.010
Table 3 Comparison of duration of labor between birthing ball group and conventional group (mean ± SD, min)
Group
n
First stage of labor
Second stage of labor
Third stage of labor
Total labor
Delivery ball group
100
510.9 ± 98.7
43.0 ± 8.5
6.1 ± 1.1
560.0 ± 120.9
Regular group
100
602.1 ± 133.2
48.4 ± 9.1
6.3 ± 1.3
656.8 ± 148.5
t
-5.501
-4.337
-1.174
-5.065
P value
0.000
0.000
0.242
0.000
Table 4 Comparison of neonatal blood gas indexes between birthing ball group and conventional group (mean ± SD)
Group
n
pH
PO2 (mmHg)
PCO2 (mmHg)
1-min Apgar (Scores)
Delivery ball group
100
7.34 ± 0.05
27.51 ± 3.61
42.70 ± 4.86
9.10 ± 0.38
Regular group
100
7.33 ± 0.05
26.83 ± 2.76
43.84 ± 4.40
8.94 ± 0.31
t
1.414
1.496
-1.739
3.263
P value
0.159
0.136
0.084
0.001
Table 5 Comparison of delivery methods between delivery ball group and routine group, n (%)
Group
n
Natural childbirth
Cesarean section
Delivery ball group
100
91 (91.00)
9 (9.00)
Regular group
100
78 (78.00)
22 (22.00)
χ2
6.452
P value
0.011
Table 6 Comparison of complication rate between birthing ball group and conventional group
Group
n
Soft birth canal laceration
Fetal distress
Amniotic fluid pollution
Contractions
Complication rate (%)
Delivery ball group
100
1
2
1
1
5 (5.00)
Regular group
100
4
4
3
0
11 (11.00)
χ2
2.446
P value
0.118
Citation: Shen HC, Wang H, Sun B, Jiang LZ, Meng Q. Birthing ball on promoting cervical ripening and its influence on the labor process and the neonatal blood gas index. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(36): 11330-11337