Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 26, 2021; 9(36): 11311-11319
Published online Dec 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i36.11311
Table 1 Demographics of the enrolled patients (n = 8, mean ± SD)
Case No.
Side of the affected ear
Gender
Age (yr)
Hearing loss
Tinnitus
Curve type
Left
Right
Male
Female
Yes
No
No
Light
Middle
Severe
A
B
C
137
238
347
463
559
667
734
864
Total622651.1 ± 13.60806020170
Table 2 Comparison of bone conduction and air conduction thresholds between the affected and contralateral heathy ears (dB HL, mean ± SD)
Group
No.
0.25 kHz, BC
0.5 kHz, BC
1 kHz, BC
2 kHz, BC
4 kHz, BC
Affected ears89.38 ± 5.6017.50 ± 9.6318.75 ± 9.1633.12 ± 12.5139.38 ± 17.41
Healthy ears88.13 ± 5.3013.13 ± 5.3011.25 ± 6.4017.50 ± 8.8622.50 ± 11.34
Z-0.220-1.282-1.973-2.570-2.161
P0.8260.2000.0480.0100.031
GroupNo.0.25 kHz, AC0.5 kHz, AC1 kHz, AC2 kHz, AC4 kHz, AC
Affected ears828.13 ± 11.6331.88 ± 15.3438.75 ± 18.2738.75 ± 16.4256.25 ± 22.16
Healthy ears88.13 ± 5.3013.13 ± 5.3011.25 ± 6.4017.50 ± 8.8622.50 ± 11.34
Z-2.965-2.971-3.242-2.797-2.905
P value0.0030.0030.0010.0050.004
Table 3 Comparison of average bone conduction thresholds and air-bone gap at low and high frequency
Group
0.25-1 kHz
2-4 kHz
Z
P value
Average BC threshold15.25 ± 6.5236.25 ± 6.52-2.8970.004
Air-bone gap16.25 ± 11.6411.56 ± 6.80-0.5270.598
Table 4 Comparison of the average hearing threshold at affected frequencies pre- and post-treatment with healthy ears
Group
Mean hearing threshold at affected frequencies (dB HL)
Z
P value
Pre-treatment37.19 ± 9.49-2.8040.005
Healthy ears19.69 ± 7.95
Post-treatment21.66 ± 9.14-0.3700.712
Table 5 Comparison of the pre-treatment air-bone gap with post-treatment values
Group
Air-bone gap (dB HL)
Z
P value
Pre-treatment14.38 ± 9.40-3.1650.002
Post-treatment3.25 ± 2.71