Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 6, 2021; 9(34): 10595-10603
Published online Dec 6, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i34.10595
Published online Dec 6, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i34.10595
Table 1 Comparison of the baseline conditions between the two groups
Baseline | Remimazolam group (n = 40) | Propofol group (n = 40) | t/χ2 value | P value |
Age (yr) | 54.9 ± 8.5 | 52.7 ± 7.0 | 1.264 | 0.210 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 24.1 ± 2.4 | 23.9 ± 2.2 | 0.389 | 0.699 |
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 126.3 ± 6.3 | 124.8 ± 8.1 | 0.925 | 0.358 |
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 75.7 ± 6.0 | 76.5 ± 7.3 | -0.535 | 0.594 |
Heart rate (times/min) | 76.7 ± 7.1 | 78.2 ± 7.7 | -0.906 | 0.368 |
Blood glucose (mmol/L) | 5.39 ± 0.51 | 5.50 ± 0.48 | -0.993 | 0.324 |
Gender, n (%) | 1.270 | 0.260 | ||
Male | 25 (62.50) | 20 (50.00) | ||
Female | 15 (37.50) | 20 (50.00) | ||
ASA grades, n (%) | 1.868 | 0.393 | ||
Grade I | 8 (20.00) | 6 (15.00) | ||
Grade II | 20 (50.00) | 26 (65.00) | ||
Grade III | 12 (30.00) | 8 (20.00) |
Table 2 Comparison of the hemodynamic parameter between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Indicators | T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 |
HR (times/min) | ||||
Remimazolam group (n = 40) | 76.7 ± 7.1 | 68.3 ± 6.5 | 66.8 ± 5.9 | 78.8 ± 6.6 |
Propofol group (n = 40) | 78.2 ± 7.7 | 66.7 ± 6.7 | 65.1 ± 6.0 | 80.5 ± 7.3 |
t value | -0.906 | 1.091 | 1.278 | -1.093 |
P value | 0.368 | 0.279 | 0.205 | 0.278 |
MAP (mmHg) | ||||
Remimazolam group (n = 40) | 98.4 ± 5.3 | 88.3 ± 4.7 | 86.7 ± 4.2 | 102.1 ± 4.8 |
Propofol group (n = 40) | 99.6 ± 4.7 | 86.0 ± 4.4 | 83.8 ± 4.5 | 103.8 ± 4.2 |
t value | -1.071 | 2.259 | 2.980 | -1.686 |
P value | 0.287 | 0.027 | 0.004 | 0.096 |
CI (L/min·m2) | ||||
Remimazolam group (n = 40) | 3.67 ± 0.62 | 3.52 ± 0.52 | 3.58 ± 0.48 | 3.57 ± 0.53 |
Propofol group (n = 40) | 3.80 ± 0.60 | 3.40 ± 0.48 | 3.51 ± 0.50 | 3.65 ± 0.49 |
t value | -0.953 | 1.072 | 0.639 | -0.701 |
P value | 0.344 | 0.287 | 0.525 | 0.485 |
SVI (mL/m2·bpm) | ||||
Remimazolam group (n = 40) | 47.83 ± 5.81 | 43.80 ± 5.26 | 41.94 ± 5.57 | 45.80 ± 5.16 |
Propofol group (n = 40) | 49.20 ± 5.63 | 40.38 ± 4.95 | 38.53 ± 4.86 | 43.73 ± 5.57 |
t value | -1.071 | 2.995 | 2.918 | 1.724 |
P value | 0.287 | 0.004 | 0.005 | 0.089 |
Table 3 Comparison of oxygenation index and respiratory index between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Indicators | T1 | T2 | T3 |
OI (mmHg) | |||
Remimazolam group (n = 40) | 398.6 ± 24.7 | 357.6 ± 28.0 | 381.8 ± 30.0 |
Propofol group (n = 40) | 390.1 ± 26.3 | 338.1 ± 30.5 | 359.4 ± 33.8 |
t value | 1.490 | 2.979 | 3.135 |
P value | 0.140 | 0.004 | 0.002 |
RI | |||
Remimazolam group (n = 40) | 0.59 ± 0.17 | 0.90 ± 0.23 | 0.50 ± 0.18 |
Propofol group (n = 40) | 0.62 ± 0.17 | 0.94 ± 0.21 | 0.56 ± 0.20 |
t value | -0.789 | -0.812 | -1.410 |
P value | 0.432 | 0.419 | 0.162 |
Table 4 Comparison of the serum levels of inflammatory factors between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Groups | Remimazolam group (n = 40) | Propofol group (n = 40) | t value | P value |
TNF-α (pg/mL) | ||||
Before surgery | 1.63 ± 0.46 | 1.80 ± 0.50 | -1.583 | 0.118 |
12 h after surgery | 3.74 ± 0.95 | 3.98 ± 1.03 | -1.083 | 0.282 |
IL-6 (pg/mL) | ||||
Before surgery | 54.83 ± 12.30 | 50.11 ± 10.86 | 1.819 | 0.073 |
12 h after surgery | 87.55 ± 15.40 | 93.28 ± 14.81 | -1.696 | 0.094 |
E (pg/μL) | ||||
Before surgery | 1.58 ± 0.38 | 1.49 ± 0.40 | 1.032 | 0.305 |
12 h after surgery | 2.52 ± 0.70 | 2.86 ± 0.76 | -2.081 | 0.041 |
NE (pg/μL) | ||||
Before surgery | 2.66 ± 0.48 | 2.48 ± 0.51 | 1.625 | 0.108 |
12 h after surgery | 3.38 ± 0.75 | 3.73 ± 0.88 | -1.914 | 0.059 |
COR (ng/mL) | ||||
Before surgery | 22.73 ± 4.81 | 21.40 ± 4.36 | 1.296 | 0.199 |
12 h after surgery | 34.20 ± 6.85 | 31.06 ± 5.72 | 2.225 | 0.029 |
GLU (mmol/L) | ||||
Before surgery | 5.39 ± 0.51 | 5.50 ± 0.48 | -0.993 | 0.324 |
12 h after surgery | 6.18 ± 0.62 | 6.54 ± 0.75 | -2.34 | 0.022 |
Table 5 Comparison of the perioperative indicators between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Indicators | Remimazolam group (n = 40) | Propofol group (n = 40) | t value | P value |
Operative time (min) | 249.6 ± 18.5 | 245.8 ± 17.0 | 0.957 | 0.342 |
Operative blood loss (mL) | 308.4 ± 20.7 | 304.1 ± 18.6 | 0.977 | 0.331 |
Intraoperative urine volume (mL) | 488.3 ± 81.0 | 502.7 ± 86.5 | -0.769 | 0.444 |
CPB transit time (min) | 115.8 ± 9.8 | 113.5 ± 10.6 | 1.008 | 0.317 |
Ascending aorta occlusion time (min) | 76.4 ± 5.1 | 78.1 ± 6.3 | -1.326 | 0.189 |
Recovery time (min) | 121.1 ± 18.0 | 140.2 ± 21.5 | -4.308 | 0.000 |
Extubation time (min) | 158.3 ± 24.7 | 174.9 ± 28.6 | -2.778 | 0.007 |
Fluid volume (mL) | 1985.6 ± 223.1 | 2056.7 ± 245.7 | -1.355 | 0.179 |
Fentanyl dosage (mg) | 122.8 ± 21.6 | 126.4 ± 34.2 | -0.563 | 0.575 |
Table 6 Comparison of the adverse reactions between the two groups, n (%)
Groups | n | Nausea | Emesis | Hypotension | Drowsiness | Uroschesis | Incidence of adverse reactions |
Remimazolam group | 40 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 (10.00) |
Propofol group | 40 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 12 (30.00) |
χ2 value | 5.000 | ||||||
P value | 0.025 |
- Citation: Tang F, Yi JM, Gong HY, Lu ZY, Chen J, Fang B, Chen C, Liu ZY. Remimazolam benzenesulfonate anesthesia effectiveness in cardiac surgery patients under general anesthesia. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(34): 10595-10603
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i34/10595.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i34.10595