Tang F, Yi JM, Gong HY, Lu ZY, Chen J, Fang B, Chen C, Liu ZY. Remimazolam benzenesulfonate anesthesia effectiveness in cardiac surgery patients under general anesthesia. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(34): 10595-10603 [PMID: 35004991 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i34.10595]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Zhi-Yi Liu, MD, Associate Chief Physician, Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, No. 17 Yongwai Road, Donghu District, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China. xiaoniuniu202107@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Anesthesiology
Article-Type of This Article
Prospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Dec 6, 2021; 9(34): 10595-10603 Published online Dec 6, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i34.10595
Table 1 Comparison of the baseline conditions between the two groups
Baseline
Remimazolam group (n = 40)
Propofol group (n = 40)
t/χ2 value
P value
Age (yr)
54.9 ± 8.5
52.7 ± 7.0
1.264
0.210
BMI (kg/m2)
24.1 ± 2.4
23.9 ± 2.2
0.389
0.699
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)
126.3 ± 6.3
124.8 ± 8.1
0.925
0.358
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)
75.7 ± 6.0
76.5 ± 7.3
-0.535
0.594
Heart rate (times/min)
76.7 ± 7.1
78.2 ± 7.7
-0.906
0.368
Blood glucose (mmol/L)
5.39 ± 0.51
5.50 ± 0.48
-0.993
0.324
Gender, n (%)
1.270
0.260
Male
25 (62.50)
20 (50.00)
Female
15 (37.50)
20 (50.00)
ASA grades, n (%)
1.868
0.393
Grade I
8 (20.00)
6 (15.00)
Grade II
20 (50.00)
26 (65.00)
Grade III
12 (30.00)
8 (20.00)
Table 2 Comparison of the hemodynamic parameter between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Indicators
T0
T1
T2
T3
HR (times/min)
Remimazolam group (n = 40)
76.7 ± 7.1
68.3 ± 6.5
66.8 ± 5.9
78.8 ± 6.6
Propofol group (n = 40)
78.2 ± 7.7
66.7 ± 6.7
65.1 ± 6.0
80.5 ± 7.3
t value
-0.906
1.091
1.278
-1.093
P value
0.368
0.279
0.205
0.278
MAP (mmHg)
Remimazolam group (n = 40)
98.4 ± 5.3
88.3 ± 4.7
86.7 ± 4.2
102.1 ± 4.8
Propofol group (n = 40)
99.6 ± 4.7
86.0 ± 4.4
83.8 ± 4.5
103.8 ± 4.2
t value
-1.071
2.259
2.980
-1.686
P value
0.287
0.027
0.004
0.096
CI (L/min·m2)
Remimazolam group (n = 40)
3.67 ± 0.62
3.52 ± 0.52
3.58 ± 0.48
3.57 ± 0.53
Propofol group (n = 40)
3.80 ± 0.60
3.40 ± 0.48
3.51 ± 0.50
3.65 ± 0.49
t value
-0.953
1.072
0.639
-0.701
P value
0.344
0.287
0.525
0.485
SVI (mL/m2·bpm)
Remimazolam group (n = 40)
47.83 ± 5.81
43.80 ± 5.26
41.94 ± 5.57
45.80 ± 5.16
Propofol group (n = 40)
49.20 ± 5.63
40.38 ± 4.95
38.53 ± 4.86
43.73 ± 5.57
t value
-1.071
2.995
2.918
1.724
P value
0.287
0.004
0.005
0.089
Table 3 Comparison of oxygenation index and respiratory index between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Indicators
T1
T2
T3
OI (mmHg)
Remimazolam group (n = 40)
398.6 ± 24.7
357.6 ± 28.0
381.8 ± 30.0
Propofol group (n = 40)
390.1 ± 26.3
338.1 ± 30.5
359.4 ± 33.8
t value
1.490
2.979
3.135
P value
0.140
0.004
0.002
RI
Remimazolam group (n = 40)
0.59 ± 0.17
0.90 ± 0.23
0.50 ± 0.18
Propofol group (n = 40)
0.62 ± 0.17
0.94 ± 0.21
0.56 ± 0.20
t value
-0.789
-0.812
-1.410
P value
0.432
0.419
0.162
Table 4 Comparison of the serum levels of inflammatory factors between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Groups
Remimazolam group (n = 40)
Propofol group (n = 40)
t value
P value
TNF-α (pg/mL)
Before surgery
1.63 ± 0.46
1.80 ± 0.50
-1.583
0.118
12 h after surgery
3.74 ± 0.95
3.98 ± 1.03
-1.083
0.282
IL-6 (pg/mL)
Before surgery
54.83 ± 12.30
50.11 ± 10.86
1.819
0.073
12 h after surgery
87.55 ± 15.40
93.28 ± 14.81
-1.696
0.094
E (pg/μL)
Before surgery
1.58 ± 0.38
1.49 ± 0.40
1.032
0.305
12 h after surgery
2.52 ± 0.70
2.86 ± 0.76
-2.081
0.041
NE (pg/μL)
Before surgery
2.66 ± 0.48
2.48 ± 0.51
1.625
0.108
12 h after surgery
3.38 ± 0.75
3.73 ± 0.88
-1.914
0.059
COR (ng/mL)
Before surgery
22.73 ± 4.81
21.40 ± 4.36
1.296
0.199
12 h after surgery
34.20 ± 6.85
31.06 ± 5.72
2.225
0.029
GLU (mmol/L)
Before surgery
5.39 ± 0.51
5.50 ± 0.48
-0.993
0.324
12 h after surgery
6.18 ± 0.62
6.54 ± 0.75
-2.34
0.022
Table 5 Comparison of the perioperative indicators between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Indicators
Remimazolam group (n = 40)
Propofol group (n = 40)
t value
P value
Operative time (min)
249.6 ± 18.5
245.8 ± 17.0
0.957
0.342
Operative blood loss (mL)
308.4 ± 20.7
304.1 ± 18.6
0.977
0.331
Intraoperative urine volume (mL)
488.3 ± 81.0
502.7 ± 86.5
-0.769
0.444
CPB transit time (min)
115.8 ± 9.8
113.5 ± 10.6
1.008
0.317
Ascending aorta occlusion time (min)
76.4 ± 5.1
78.1 ± 6.3
-1.326
0.189
Recovery time (min)
121.1 ± 18.0
140.2 ± 21.5
-4.308
0.000
Extubation time (min)
158.3 ± 24.7
174.9 ± 28.6
-2.778
0.007
Fluid volume (mL)
1985.6 ± 223.1
2056.7 ± 245.7
-1.355
0.179
Fentanyl dosage (mg)
122.8 ± 21.6
126.4 ± 34.2
-0.563
0.575
Table 6 Comparison of the adverse reactions between the two groups, n (%)
Groups
n
Nausea
Emesis
Hypotension
Drowsiness
Uroschesis
Incidence of adverse reactions
Remimazolam group
40
1
0
1
1
1
4 (10.00)
Propofol group
40
3
1
3
3
2
12 (30.00)
χ2 value
5.000
P value
0.025
Citation: Tang F, Yi JM, Gong HY, Lu ZY, Chen J, Fang B, Chen C, Liu ZY. Remimazolam benzenesulfonate anesthesia effectiveness in cardiac surgery patients under general anesthesia. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(34): 10595-10603