Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 26, 2021; 9(3): 736-747
Published online Jan 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i3.736
Published online Jan 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i3.736
Table 1 Laboratory examinations and history of past illness
Case No. | ALT, IU/L | AST, IU/L | TBIL, μmol/L | DBIL, μmol/L | Hb, g/L | WBC, 109/L | PT, s | History of past illness |
1 | 17.3 | 18 | 22.3 | 6.8 | 148 | 5.43 | 11.9 | Hypertension |
2 | 1025.4 | 594.9 | 92.4 | 63.7 | 140 | 8.24 | 10.9 | Normal |
3 | 129.6 | 72.6 | 12.9 | 2.8 | 129 | 4.18 | 10.8 | Normal |
4 | 115.8 | 58.7 | 35.3 | 10.8 | 151 | 5.08 | 10.2 | Right upper lung lobectomy |
5 | 184.1 | 71.9 | 13.6 | 3.4 | 129 | 4.65 | 10.8 | Normal |
6 | 28.4 | 21.8 | 12.6 | 2 | 135 | 8.89 | 11.6 | Duodenectomy and anastomosis |
Table 2 Follow-up results after removing gallstones and choledocholithiasis by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
No. | Follow-up period in mo | Residual stones | GBEF before surgery, % | GBEF after surgery, % | Biliary colic | Calculus recurrence | ||
3 mo | 6 mo | 9 mo | ||||||
1 | 11 | No | 53 | 95 | 82 | 83 | No | No |
2 | 6 | No | 60 | 73 | 80 | NA | No | No |
3 | 8 | No | 55 | 60 | NA | NA | No | No |
4 | 6 | No | NA | 52 | NA | NA | No | No |
5 | 6 | No | 54 | 62 | 68 | NA | No | No |
6 | 8 | No | NA | 56 | 72 | NA | No | No |
Table 3 Clinicopathological data of included patients
No. | Gender | Age in yr | Number of gallstones | Diameter of gallstones, mm | Thickness of gallbladder wall, mm | Cystic duct diameter, mm | Cystic duct length, mm | Cystic duct direction | Number of choledocholithiasis | Diameter of common bile duct, mm | Diameter of choledocholithiasis, mm | Dilating the cystic duct | |||
1 | Male | 66 | 3 | 13 | 5.6 | 6 | 2.9 | Right | 16 | 13 | 13 | Yes | |||
2 | Female | 28 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 3.5 | Right | 6 | 16.3 | 6 | No | |||
3 | Female | 31 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 2.5 | Right | 4 | 15 | 5 | Yes | |||
4 | Male | 43 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 | Dorsal | 3 | 12 | 5 | No | |||
5 | Female | 41 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 3 | Right | 1 | 10 | 7 | No | |||
6 | Male | 59 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 2.7 | Dorsal | 2 | 11 | 9 | Yes |
Table 4 Intraoperative parameters and information of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
No. | ERCP operation time, min | EPBD, cm | Biliary stent | ENBD | Secondary ERCP |
1 | 140 | 0.8 | No | Yes | Yes |
2 | 120 | 0.6 | No | Yes | No |
3 | 125 | 0.8 | No | Yes | No |
4 | 95 | 0.6 | No | Yes | No |
5 | 105 | 0.6 | No | Yes | No |
6 | 110 | 0.8 | No | Yes | No |
Table 5 Postoperative complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
No. | Hyperamylasemia | Cholecystitis | Hemorrhage | Cholangitis | Cystic duct injury | Duodenal injury |
1 | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
2 | No | No | No | No | No | No |
3 | No | Yes | No | No | No | No |
4 | No | No | No | No | No | No |
5 | No | No | No | No | No | No |
6 | No | No | No | No | No | No |
- Citation: He YG, Gao MF, Li J, Peng XH, Tang YC, Huang XB, Li YM. Cystic duct dilation through endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for treatment of gallstones and choledocholithiasis: Six case reports and review of literature. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(3): 736-747
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i3/736.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i3.736