Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 26, 2021; 9(3): 632-638
Published online Jan 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i3.632
Published online Jan 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i3.632
Table 1 Scores of clinical assessments before and after intervention and at 4-wk follow-up
FMA-LE (total score) | BBS (total score) | TUGT (s) | |
Pre-treatment | 18 (34) | 39 (56) | 34.1 |
Post-treatment | 18 (34) | 43 (56) | 27.1 |
Follow-up | 18 (34) | 45 (56) | 27.5 |
Table 2 Plantar pressure distributions in percentage measured on days 1 (baseline/pretreatment), 4, 7, 11, 14 (posttreatment), and 28 (follow-up) on the affected side and unaffected side
Toes area | Metatarsal area | Midfoot area | Heel area | |||||
Affected | Unaffected | Affected | Unaffected | Affected | Unaffected | Affected | Unaffected | |
Day 01 | 0 | 6.92 | 16.93 | 40.63 | 6.47 | 11.43 | 76.1 | 40.77 |
Day 04 | 0 | 12.98 | 25.06 | 47.62 | 9.04 | 9.42 | 64.48 | 30.96 |
Day 07 | 6.15 | 7.67 | 36.55 | 49.74 | 3.82 | 11.76 | 53.66 | 32.35 |
Day 11 | 7.71 | 6.75 | 33.17 | 50.13 | 8.15 | 14.84 | 51.32 | 29.02 |
Day 14 | 12.9 | 4.92 | 30.8 | 42.43 | 6.87 | 9.23 | 48.59 | 42.46 |
Day 28 | 11.75 | 5.27 | 22.02 | 53.72 | 15.9 | 11.71 | 50.32 | 28.52 |
Table 3 Gait spatial-temporal parameters and symmetric index before and after intervention and at 4-wk follow-up
Mean velocity (%height/s) | Cadence (steps/min) | Symmetric index (SI, %) | ||
SIStride (%height) | SICadence | |||
Pre-treatment | 16.95 | 73.60 | 125.12 | 193.31 |
Post-treatment | 18.21 | 81.20 | 126.74 | 193.85 |
Follow-up | 18.39 | 76.40 | 122.40 | 193.69 |
Table 4 Mean root-mean-square values (μv) over the gait cycle computed for the tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius lateralis, and gastrocnemius medialis of the affected and unaffected lower limbs before and after intervention and at 4-wk
TA | GL | GM | Symmetric index (SI, %) | ||||||
Affected | Unaffected | Affected | Unaffected | Affected | Unaffected | SITA | SIGL | SIGM | |
Stance phase | |||||||||
Pre-treatment | 9.95 | 75.78 | 22.53 | 72.83 | 11.96 | 48.20 | 153.58 | 105.49 | 120.48 |
Post-treatment | 19.46 | 77.74 | 25.95 | 46.85 | 19.00 | 41.24 | 119.92 | 57.42 | 73.84 |
Follow-up | 25.54 | 55.85 | 23.05 | 58.38 | 20.41 | 43.24 | 74.48 | 86.77 | 71.74 |
Swing phase | |||||||||
Pre-treatment | 8.11 | 88.40 | 20.27 | 52.73 | 9.93 | 41.19 | 166.39 | 88.93 | 122.30 |
Post-treatment | 20.73 | 67.43 | 22.12 | 34.60 | 17.96 | 27.23 | 105.94 | 44.01 | 41.03 |
Follow-up | 36.38 | 73.66 | 21.74 | 33.18 | 18.97 | 30.26 | 67.76 | 41.66 | 45.87 |
- Citation: Tang HF, Yang B, Lin Q, Liang JJ, Mou ZW. Dynamic biomechanical effect of lower body positive pressure treadmill training for hemiplegic gait rehabilitation after stroke: A case report. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(3): 632-638
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i3/632.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i3.632