Case Report
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 6, 2021; 9(28): 8482-8491
Published online Oct 6, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i28.8482
Table 1 Biochemical parameters determined before and after surgery
Test (units/reference range)Case 1
Case 2
Case 3
Before surgery
After surgery
Before surgery
After surgery
Before surgery
After surgery
LH (mUI/mL) (11.3-40.0)9.9118.5816.9838.616.72ND
FSH (mUI/mL) (9.7-111.0)22.948.720.75107.9914.88ND
Total testosterone (ng/dL) (10.83-56.94)504.535.7258.0917.5326.0321.25
Oestradiol (pg/mL) (< 30)5111.873.211071.38ND
Progesterone (ng/mL)0.490.30.430.10.24ND
Androstenedione (ng/mL) (0.3-3.3)1.6ND2ND1.7ND
DHEA-S (mg/dL)42.1ND50.5ND44.3ND
17 OHP (ng/mL) (0.2–1.7)1.7NDNDNDNDND
17 OHP (ng/mL) 600 after ACTH stimulation test0.1NDNDNDNDND
Table 2 Radiological features

Case 1
Case 2
Case 3
Pelvic ultrasoundHyperechoic nodule of Ro (12.3 mm)Hyperechoic mass of Lo (34 mm× 22 mm)Hyperechoic mass of Lo (45 mm × 20 mm)
Pelvic CTNodular slightly dense shadow of Ro with visible enhancement after enhancementNDOval slightly lower density mass of left adnexal area uneven enhancement after enhancement, continuous enhancement in venous phase
Pelvic MRIRound-shaped abnormal signal range of Ro, T2W1 and DW1 are high signal, higher signal area can be seen in the centerA circular signal shadow of Lo, equal to T1 long and T2 signal, DWI high signal, and obviously enhanced after enhancementND