Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 6, 2021; 9(28): 8366-8373
Published online Oct 6, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i28.8366
Published online Oct 6, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i28.8366
Table 1 Comparison of ultrasonic parameters between two groups (mean ± SD)
Group | n | E/A | LVDd (mm) | LAD (mm) |
Research group | 106 | 1.46 ± 0.34 | 58.24 ± 5.05 | 43.31 ± 4.38 |
Control group | 106 | 1.88 ± 0.44 | 48.15 ± 3.93 | 34.94 ± 2.81 |
t | 7.776 | 16.234 | 16.560 | |
P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Table 2 Comparison of ultrasonic parameters in patients with coronary heart disease with different cardiac function grades (mean ± SD)
Group | n | E/A | LVDd (mm) | LAD (mm) |
Grade II | 45 | 1.71 ± 0.48 | 52.18 ± 3.67 | 39.68 ± 2.37 |
Grade III | 37 | 1.41 ± 0.43 | 60.04 ± 4.21 | 44.16 ± 2.79 |
Grade IV | 24 | 1.08 ± 0.39 | 66.81 ± 5.39 | 48.81 ± 3.95 |
t/P value (Grade II vs III) | 2.950/0.004 | 8.995/0.000 | 7.863/0.000 | |
t/P value (Grade III vs IV) | 3.035/0.004 | 5.490/0.000 | 5.391/0.000 |
Table 3 Comparison of ultrasonic parameters in patients with different degrees of coronary heart disease (mean ± SD)
Group | Number | E/A | LVDd (mm) | LAD (mm) |
Mild | 43 | 1.69 ± 0.50 | 51.97 ± 3.88 | 38.81 ± 2.56 |
Moderate | 38 | 1.44 ± 0.41 | 59.95 ± 4.14 | 45.15 ± 2.97 |
Severe | 25 | 1.13 ± 0.36 | 67.70 ± 6.11 | 49.09 ± 4.05 |
t/P value (Grade II vs III) | 2.441/0.017 | 8.952/0.000 | 10.319/0.000 | |
t/P value (Grade III vs IV) | 3.078/0.003 | 6.009/0.000 | 4.453/0.000 |
Table 4 Correlation between ultrasonic parameters and cardiac function grade and lesion degree of coronary heart disease (n = 106)
Project | E/A | LVDd | LA |
Cardiac function classification | |||
r | 0.606 | 0.589 | 0.577 |
P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Degree of lesion | |||
r | 0.631 | 0.597 | 0.561 |
P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of ultrasonic parameters in patients with coronary heart disease with different prognosis (mean ± SD)
Group | n | E/A | LVDd (mm) | LAD (mm) |
Good prognosis group | 95 | 1.83 ± 0.51 | 49.60 ± 4.39 | 36.13 ± 3.05 |
Poor prognosis group | 11 | 1.39 ± 0.32 | 59.09 ± 5.67 | 45.10 ± 5.60 |
t | 2.791 | 6.579 | 8.333 | |
P value | 0.006 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Zhang JF, Du YH, Hu HY, Han XQ. Ultrasonographic assessment of cardiac function and disease severity in coronary heart disease. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(28): 8366-8373
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i28/8366.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i28.8366