Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 16, 2021; 9(17): 4166-4177
Published online Jun 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i17.4166
Published online Jun 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i17.4166
Table 1 Baseline characteristics between the experienced and less experienced endoscopists
Total, n = 542, (%) | Experienced, n = 237, (%) | Less-experienced, n = 305, (%) | P value | |
Age (yr) | 67.8 ± 13.4 | 66.6 ± 14.2 | 68.7 ± 12.6 | 0.070 |
Male (%) | 307 (56.6) | 129 (54.4) | 178 (58.4) | 0.361 |
Periampullary diverticulum | 163 (30.1) | 81 (34.2) | 82 (26.9) | 0.067 |
Ampulla configurations | 0.224 | |||
Non-prominent | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Prominent | 455 (83.9) | 205 (86.5) | 250 (82.0) | |
Bulging | 65 (12.0) | 25 (10.5) | 0 (13.1) | |
Distorted | 15 (2.8) | 3 (1.3) | 12 (3.9) | |
Hook-nose shape | 7 (1.3) | 4 (1.7) | 3 (1.0) | |
Malignancy | 200 (36.9) | 91 (38.4) | 109 (35.7) | 0.525 |
Benign diseases | 342 (63.1) | 146 (61.6) | 196 (64.3) |
Table 2 Baseline characteristics between the conventional technique with sphincterotomy and needle-knife fistulotomy groups
Conventional technique with sphincterotomy, n = 375, (%) | Primary NKF less-experienced, n = 167, (%) | |||||
Experienced, n = 147, (%) | Less-experienced, n = 228, (%) | P value | Experienced, n = 90, (%) | Less-experienced, n = 77, (%) | P value | |
Age (yr) | 68.8 ± 12.9 | 68.7 ± 12.1 | 0.964 | 63.1 ± 15.6 | 68.7 ± 14.3 | |
Male | 75 (51.0) | 130 (57.0) | 0.256 | 54 (60.0) | 48 (62.3) | 0.759 |
Periampullary diverticulum | 52 (35.4) | 68 (29.8) | 0.262 | 29 (32.2) | 14 (18.2) | 0.039a |
Ampulla configurations | 0.625 | 0.265 | ||||
Non-prominent | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
Prominent | 136 (92.5) | 205 (89.9) | 69 (76.7) | 54 (70.1) | ||
Bulging | 8 (5.4) | 19 (8.3) | 17 (18.9) | 16 (20.8) | ||
Distorted | 2 (1.4) | 3 (1.3) | 1 (1.1) | 5 (6.50) | ||
Hook-nose shape | 1 (0.7) | 1 (0.4) | 3 (3.3) | 2 (2.6) | ||
Malignancy | 58 (39.5) | 80 (35.1) | 0.393 | 33 (36.7) | 29 (37.7) | 0.895 |
Benign diseases | 89 (60.5) | 148 (64.9) | 57 (63.3) | 48 (62.3) |
Table 3 Compared results between the experienced and less-experienced endoscopists in each primary cannulation technique
Conventional technique with sphincterotomy | NKF | |||||
Experienced (n = 147) (%) | Less-experienced (n = 228) (%) | P value | Experienced (n = 90) (%) | Less-experienced (n = 77) (%) | P value | |
Success rate | 361/375 (96.3) | 161/167 (96.4) | 0.936 | |||
144/147 (98.0) | 217/228 (95.2) | 0.166 | 88/90 (97.8) | 73/77 (94.8) | 0.306 | |
Cannulation time (min) | 4.8 ± 3.5 | 4.8 ± 3.2 | 0.951 | |||
5.1 ± 3.5 | 4.6 ± 3.6 | 0.200 | 4.2 ± 3.1 | 5.5 ± 3.1 | 0.010a | |
Total procedure time (min) | 17.2 ± 9.2 | 15.2 ± 8.2 | 0.019a | |||
17.6 ± 9.6 | 16.9 ± 8.9 | 0.490 | 14.9 ± 8.4 | 15.6 ± 8.0 | 0.598 | |
Post-ERCP pancreatitis | 25 (6.7) | 4 (2.4) | 0.040a | |||
5 (3.4) | 20 (8.9) | 0.039a | 1 (1.1) | 3 (3.9) | 0.243 | |
Hyperamylasemia | 52 (14.0) | 13 (7.8) | 0.041a | |||
15 (10.2) | 37 (16.4) | 0.090 | 5 (5.6) | 9 (11.7) | 0.156 | |
Bleeding | 10 (2.7) | 6 (3.6) | 0.568 | |||
2 (1.4) | 8 (3.6) | 0.202 | 2 (2.2) | 4 (5.2) | 0.306 | |
Perforation | 1 (0.3) | 0 (0) | 0.505 | |||
0 (0) | 1 (0.4) | 0.423 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | NA |
Table 4 Clinical factors associated with post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in conventional technique with sphincterotomy and needle-knife fistulotomy group
Conventional technique with sphincterotomy | NKF | |||||||||||
Total | With PEP | Without PEP | P value | Odd ratio (95%CI) | Total | With PEP | Without PEP | P value | Odd ratio (95%CI) | |||
n = 375, (%) | n = 25, (%) | n = 350, (%) | Uni- | Multi- | n = 167, (%) | n = 4, (%) | n = 163, (%) | Uni- | Multi- | |||
Age (yr) | 68.7 ± 12.4 | 65.6 ± 12.5 | 69.0 ± 12.4 | 0.194 | 0.126 | 0.98(0.94-1.01) | 65.7 ± 15.3 | 69.8 ± 11.9 | 65.6 ± 15.3 | 0.593 | - | |
Male (%) | 205 (54.7) | 12 (48.0) | 193 (55.1) | 0.490 | 102 (61.1) | 2 (50.0) | 100 (61.3) | 0.648 | - | |||
Periampullary diverticulum | 120 (32.0) | 8 (32.0) | 112 (32.0) | 0.999 | 43 (25.7) | 1 (25.0) | 42 (25.8) | 0.973 | - | |||
Malignancy | 138 (36.8) | 9 (36.0) | 129 (36.9) | 0.932 | 62 (37.1) | 3 (75.0) | 59 (36.2) | 0.114 | 0.165 | 4.74(0.41-54.8) | ||
Benign diseases | 237 (63.2) | 16 (64.0) | 221 (63.1) | - | 105 (62.9) | 1 (25.0) | 104 (63.8) | - | - | |||
Less-experienced endoscopist | 228 (60.8) | 20 (80.0) | 208 (59.4) | 0.044a | 0.037a | 2.94(1.07-8.10) | 77 (46.1) | 3 (75.0) | 74 (45.4) | 0.243 | 0.110 | 6.40 (0.45-90.6) |
Pancreatic duct stent | 72 (19.2) | 4 (16.0) | 68 (19.4) | 0.675 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | - | - | |||
Cannulation time (min) | 4.8 ± 3.5 | 5.3 ± 3.5 | 4.7 ± 3.5 | 0.431 | 4.8 ± 3.2 | 8.8 ± 1.7 | 4.7 ± 3.1 | 0.010a | 0.945 | 0.99 (0.75-1.31) | ||
Total procedure time (min) | 17.2 ± 9.2 | 21.0 ± 8.8 | 16.9 ± 9.2 | 0.031a | 0.026a | 1.04 (1.01-1.08) | 15.2 ± 8.2 | 30.0 ± 9.3 | 14.8 ± 7.9 | 0.000a | 0.004a | 1.14 (1.04-1.25) |
- Citation: Han SY, Baek DH, Kim DU, Park CJ, Park YJ, Lee MW, Song GA. Primary needle-knife fistulotomy for preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: Importance of the endoscopist’s expertise level. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(17): 4166-4177
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i17/4166.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i17.4166