Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. May 26, 2021; 9(15): 3586-3596
Published online May 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i15.3586
Table 1 The Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale (by colon segment)
ScoreDescription
0Excellent: Clearly visible mucosal detail with almost no stool residue; any fluid present is clear with hardly any stool residue
1Good: Some turbid fluid or stool residue, but mucosal detail still visible without the need for washing/suctioning
2Fair: Some turbid fluid of stool residue obscuring mucosal detail; however, mucosal detail becomes visible with suctioning; washing not needed
3Poor: Stool present obscuring mucosal detail and contour; a reasonable view is obtained by suctioning and washing
4Inadequate: Solid stool obscuring mucosal detail, which cannot be cleared by washing and suctioning
Table 2 The Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale (total colon fluid)
Score
Description
0Small volume of fluid
1Moderate volume of fluid
2Large volume of fluid
Table 3 Baseline characteristics of the study group, n (%)
Characteristics
Study population, n = 64
Gender
Male42 (65.63)
Female22 (34.38)
BMI, mean, kg/m225.1
BMI > 2532 (50.00)
BMI ≤ 2532 (50.00)
Constipation6 (9.38)
History of abdominal surgery9 (14.06)
Indication
Screening47 (73.44)
History of colon polyp12 (18.75)
Chronic constipation3 (4.69)
Diarrhea0 (0.00)
Other2 (3.13)
History of past colonoscopy42 (65.63)
Table 4 Efficacy, acceptability and tolerability of bowel preparation
Variables
Score
OBPS (mean)
Ascending1.4
Mid0.9
Rectosigmoid0.8
Total colon fluid0.5
Overall (mean ± SD)3.6 ± 0.312
Quality of bowel preparation, n (%)
Success rate (OBPS ≤ 7)58 (93.55)
Excellence rate (OBPS ≤ 4)42 (67.74)
Polyp detection rate (%)36.9
Supplementary water intake (mL)3000 (2250, 3800)
Sleep quality-VAS0 (0, 6)
Anal pain-VAS0 (0, 6)
Ease of drinking-VAS10 (4, 10)
Taste-VAS10 (5, 10)
Table 5 Univariate analysis
Variables
Overall
OBPS ≤ 4, n = 42
OBPS > 4, n = 20
Statistics
P value
Age (mean ± SD) 50.20 ± 10.3647.90 ± 8.9055.50 ± 11.902.810.0066
Male41 (65.63)30 (71.40)11 (55.00)1.63 0.255
BMI25.1 ± 4.025.4 ± 4.124.6 ± 3.9-0.680.4963
≤ 25 31 (50.00)19 (45.20)12 (60.00)
> 25 31 (50.00)23 (54.80)8 (40.00)
Constipation6 (9.38)1 (2.40)5 (25.00)7.93010.0112
History of abdominal surgery9 (14.06)4 (9.50)5 (25.00)2.61510.133
Taking drugs10 (15.63)5 (11.90)5 (25.00)1.71750.269
Indications2.3480.141
Screening45 (72.58)33 (78.60)12 (60.00)
Other17 (27.42)9 (21.40)8 (40.00)
No history of past colonoscopy40 (65.63)29 (69.00)11 (55.00)1.16790.395
Minutes from 1st dose of Picolax
First stool73.0 (8, 243)86.7 (8, 243)98.2 (15, 230)0.72340.4694
Last stool169.3 ± 96.8175.0 ± 104.8158.1 ± 79.4-0.640.5246
Minutes from 2nd dose of Picolax
First stool38.9 ± 28.137.8 ± 28.542.8 ± 28.50.650.5212
Last stool139.5 ± 63.1140.9 ± 56.0137.9-0.180.8602
Water intake (mL)3000.0 (2250, 3800)2989.3 (2250, 3000)2877.5 (2250, 3800)3.62450.0569
Total frequency of defecation9.0 (5, 21)8.5 (5, 17)9.0 (5, 21)0.28190.779
Sleep disturbances (VAS > 1)2.8240.7271
Yes2015 (35.7)5 (25.0)
No4227 (64.3)15 (75.0)
Ease of drinking0.011
Easy (VAS ≥ 9)4631 (73.8)15 (75.0)
Hard (VAS < 9)1611 (26.2)5 (25.0)
Taste0.22141
Satisfied (VAS ≥ 9)5436 (85.7)18 (90.0)
Dissatisfied (VAS < 9)86 (14.3)2 (10.0)
Table 6 Univariate logistic regression analysis for the group with Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale > 4
Variable
Regression coefficient
SEM
Statistics
P value
OR
95%CI
Age0.07420.02996.17320.0131.0771.0160-1.1420
Male (n, %)0.71560.56451.60710.20492.0460.2677-6.1850
Constipation2.61491.13625.29620.021413.6651.4740-126.6990