Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. May 6, 2021; 9(13): 3014-3023
Published online May 6, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i13.3014
Table 1 Sensitivity and specificity of the Updated Sydney system
Measure
Atrophy class
Mild
Moderate
Severe
Sensitivity25%36%42%
Specificity100%100%100%
Patients with atrophy by the reference method, n836121
Patients with atrophy by the Updated Sydney system, n21351
Pseudo-negative results by the Updated Sydney system, n62370
Table 2 Structure of atrophic gastritis according to the Updated Sydney system, n (%)
Atrophy class, patients
Biopsy count
1
2
Mild, n = 21 (0.6)2 (1.2)
Moderate, n = 13 9 (5.5)13 (7.9)
Severe, n = 51 28 (17.0)51 (31.0)
Table 3 Structure of atrophic gastritis according to the Updated Kimura-Takemoto classification system, n (%)

Biopsy count
Atrophy class, patients
1
≤ 2
≤ 3
≤ 4
≤ 5
Mild, n = 82 (1.2)5 (3.0)6 (3.6)7 (4.2)8 (4.8)
Moderate, n = 3621 (12.7)27 (16.4)30 (18.2)34 (20.6)36 (21.8)
Severe, n = 12140 (24.0)79 (48.0)96 (58.0)109 (66.0)121 (73.4)
Table 4 Structure of the atrophy types according to the Updated Kimura-Takemoto classification system
Type of gastric atrophy
Patients, n
Patients (%)
Sequential uniform type4628
Sequential non-uniform type117
Diffuse uniform type3823
Diffuse non-uniform type4024
"Alternating atrophic – non-atrophic"3018
Total165100