Hao YJ, Sun HB, Li HW, Chen BJ, Chen XL, Ma L, Li YL. Application of positive behavior management in patients after breast cancer surgery. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(4): 689-699 [PMID: 32149053 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i4.689]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Ying-Li Li, BMed, Chief Nurse, Department of Otolaryngology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical University, 27 Taishun Street, Qiqihar 161000, Heilongjiang Province, China. haoyingjie816@126.com
Research Domain of This Article
Oncology
Article-Type of This Article
Case Control Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Feb 26, 2020; 8(4): 689-699 Published online Feb 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i4.689
Table 1 Basic patient data
Item
Experimental group
Control group
Statistics
P value
Gender
Male
20
19
0.368
> 0.05
Female
22
23
Age (yr)
63.5 ± 4.1
63.8 ± 4.2
0.987
> 0.05
Education
Junior high and below
10
11
0.785
> 0.05
High school
8
7
College
13
12
Bachelor and above
11
12
Pathology
Noninvasive
12
10
1.236
> 0.05
Early invasive
8
10
Invasive special
22
22
Clinical stage
Phase I
8
10
0.910
> 0.05
Phase II
12
11
Phase III
10
10
Phase IV
12
11
Income (RMB Yuan)
< 3000
12
11
0.368
> 0.05
3000–5000
10
9
> 5001
20
22
Table 2 Self-efficacy before and after intervention in the two groups of patients (cases)
Group
Cases
Self confidence before intervention
Self confidence after intervention
Low
Relatively low
Relatively high
Very high
Low
Relatively low
Relatively high
Very high
Experiment
42
15
13
8
6
3
8
17
14
Control
42
17
12
8
5
7
18
10
7
Statistics
-
0.672
17.821
P value
-
> 0.05
< 0.05
Table 3 Level of hope before and after intervention in the two groups of patients (points)
Group
Cases
Before intervention
After intervention
A
B
C
A
B
C
Experiment
42
7.3 ± 1.8
8.1 ± 2.0
7.6 ± 1.9
15.0 ± 2.4
14.5 ± 2.9
14.8 ± 2.2
Control
42
7.4 ± 1.9
8.0 ± 1.9
7.4 ± 1.8
8.7 ± 2.3
10.4 ± 2.6
9.5 ± 2.0
Statistics
-
0.901
1.027
0.674
15.272
16.268
13.232
P value
-
> 0.05
> 0.05
> 0.05
< 0.05
< 0.05
< 0.05
Table 4 Negative emotion scores before and after intervention in the two groups (points)
Group
Cases
Before intervention
After intervention
SAS
SDS
SAS
SDS
Experiment
42
63.5 ± 4.1
62.7 ± 3.8
51.7 ± 2.2
52.8 ± 2.4
Control
42
63.7 ± 4.2
62.9 ± 3.9
59.8 ± 3.7
58.6 ± 3.7
Statistics
-
0.784
1.209
14.324
17.263
P value
-
> 0.05
> 0.05
< 0.05
< 0.05
Table 5 Quality of life before intervention in the two groups of patients (cases)
Group
Cases
Physical function
Role function
Social function
Emotional function
Cognitive function
Experiment
42
68.3 ± 3.2
62.1 ± 2.9
64.5 ± 3.3
57.4 ± 2.7
60.2 ± 3.0
Control
42
68.5 ± 3.3
62.4 ± 3.0
64.7 ± 3.5
58.0 ± 3.0
60.4 ± 3.1
Statistics
-
0.899
1.027
0.931
0.764
0.883
P value
-
> 0.05
> 0.05
> 0.05
> 0.05
> 0.05
Table 6 Quality of life after intervention in two groups of patients (cases)
Group
Cases
Physical function
Role function
Social function
Emotional function
Cognitive function
Experiment
42
85.1 ± 4.4
88.4 ± 4.8
87.5 ± 4.9
83.2 ± 3.9
83.5 ± 4.5
Control
42
72.4 ± 3.6
73.2 ± 3.5
71.3 ± 4.0
68.7 ± 3.3
71.3 ± 3.4
Statistics
-
17.872
13.290
16.534
12.381
16.788
P value
-
< 0.05
< 0.05
< 0.05
< 0.05
< 0.05
Citation: Hao YJ, Sun HB, Li HW, Chen BJ, Chen XL, Ma L, Li YL. Application of positive behavior management in patients after breast cancer surgery. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(4): 689-699