Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 26, 2020; 8(18): 4059-4066
Published online Sep 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i18.4059
Published online Sep 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i18.4059
Table 1 Comparison of the general characteristics of the 2 groups, n (%)
Information | Study group (n = 46) | Control group (n = 46) | t/χ2/U value | P value |
Age (yr) | 39-66 (52.51 ± 6.04) | 40-69 (53.02 ± 5.96) | 0.408 | 0.685 |
Sex | 0.177 | 0.674 | ||
Male | 25 (54.35) | 27 (58.70) | ||
Female | 21(45.65) | 19(41.30) | ||
Stage of disease | 0.436 | 0.663 | ||
Stage I | 7 (15.22) | 9 (19.57) | ||
Stage II | 29 (63.04) | 28 (60.87) | ||
Stage III | 10 (21.74) | 9 (19.57) | ||
Education level | 0.194 | 0.908 | ||
Primary school | 11 (23.91) | 10 (21.74) | ||
Secondary school | 28 (60.87) | 30 (65.22) | ||
College and above | 7 (15.22) | 6 (13.04) | ||
Type of pathology | 0.492 | 0.782 | ||
Squamous carcinoma | 21 (45.65) | 19 (41.30) | ||
Adenocarcinoma | 22 (47.83) | 25 (54.35) | ||
Adenosquamous carcinoma | 3 (6.52) | 2 (4.35) |
Table 2 Comparison of self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale scores between the two groups (mean ± SD, scores)
Group | Number of cases | SAS | SDS |
Before the intervention | |||
Study group | 46 | 59.71 ± 5.04 | 60.56 ± 6.29 |
Control group | 46 | 60.69 ± 5.63 | 62.08 ± 6.40 |
t value | 0.880 | 1.149 | |
P value | 0.381 | 0.254 | |
After the intervention | |||
Study group | 46 | 45.45 ± 4.70 | 46.69 ± 5.23 |
Control group | 46 | 51.55 ± 5.01 | 53.04 ± 5.71 |
t value | 6.023 | 5.562 | |
P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of self-care ability measurement table scores between the two groups (mean ± SD, scores)
Group | Number of cases | Health knowledge | Self-concept | Self-responsibility | Self-care skills |
Before the intervention | |||||
Study group | 46 | 30.11 ± 5.19 | 19.63 ± 3.08 | 18.23 ± 4.06 | 21.79 ± 4.56 |
Control group | 46 | 29.56 ± 5.02 | 20.04 ± 2.83 | 17.88 ± 3.78 | 22.01 ± 5.04 |
t value | 0.517 | 0.665 | 0.428 | 0.220 | |
P value | 0.607 | 0.508 | 0.670 | 0.827 | |
After the intervention | |||||
Study group | 46 | 41.38 ± 4.56 | 26.02 ± 3.18 | 28.03 ± 3.12 | 34.56 ± 3.14 |
Control group | 46 | 33.41 ± 6.00 | 21.69 ± 3.06 | 22.56 ± 2.56 | 26.77 ± 3.48 |
t value | 7.173 | 6.655 | 9.193 | 11.272 | |
P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of Zarit Caregiver Burden scale scores between the two groups (mean ± SD, scores)
Group | Number of cases | Personal burden | Responsibility burden |
Before the intervention | |||
Study group | 46 | 32.38 ± 3.15 | 19.56 ± 5.11 |
Control group | 46 | 31.15 ± 4.11 | 20.33 ± 4.46 |
After the intervention | |||
Study group | 46 | 17.67 ± 3.32 | 9.53 ± 2.51 |
Control group | 46 | 21.04 ± 3.17 | 11.87 ± 3.06 |
Table 5 Comparison of nursing satisfaction between the two groups, n (%)
Group | Number of cases | Very satisfied | Satisfied | General satisfaction | Dissatisfied | Very dissatisfied | Satisfaction |
Study group | 46 | 18 (39.13) | 23 (50.00) | 2 (4.35) | 3 (6.52) | 0 (0.00) | 43 (93.48) |
Control group | 46 | 13 (28.26) | 19 (41.30) | 4 (8.70) | 8 (17.39) | 2 (4.35) | 36 (78.26) |
χ2 value | 4.390 | ||||||
P value | 0.036 |
- Citation: Long FJ, Chen H, Wang YF, He LM, Chen L, Liang ZB, Chen YN, Gong XH. Research on the effect of health care integration on patients’ negative emotions and satisfaction with lung cancer nursing activities. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(18): 4059-4066
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i18/4059.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i18.4059