Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 26, 2020; 8(18): 4010-4016
Published online Sep 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i18.4010
Table 1 Comparison of efficacy between the two groups, n (%)
GroupsWell-controlledEffectively-controlledIneffectiveOverall efficacy
Control group3819357 (95.00)
Experimental group4018258 (96.67)
χ20.349
P value> 0.05
Table 2 Comparison of levels of bone mineral density and bone metabolic markers between the two groups
GroupsnBMD, g/cm2
N-MID, ng/mLβ-CTx, pg/mL25(OH)D, ng/mL
Lumbar L1-4Hip
Control group
Before the treatment600.71 ± 0.130.62 ± 0.0919.35 ± 8.14498.57 ± 210.029.54 ± 3.67
After the treatment600.88 ± 0.17a0.76 ± 0.15a15.54 ± 5.23376.27 ± 157.4517.97 ± 5.74
Experimental group
Before the treatment600.73 ± 0.110.64 ± 0.0820.41 ± 8.13504.74 ± 237.419.23 ± 2.84
After the treatment601.04 ± 0.25ab0.93 ± 0.20ab10.68 ± 4.24ab310.64 ± 146.83ab25.96 ± 6.91ab