Shivanna MM, Ganesh S, Khanagar SB, Naik S, Divakar DD, Al-Kheraif AA, Jhugroo C. Twelve-month evaluation of the atraumatic restorative treatment approach for class III restorations: An interventional study. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(18): 3999-4009 [PMID: 33024756 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i18.3999]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Sachin Naik, MDS, Associate Professor, Dental Biomaterials Research Chair, Dental Health Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, PO Box 7805, Riyadh 11433, Saudi Arabia. sachinnaiksln@gmail.com
Research Domain of This Article
Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Article-Type of This Article
Clinical and Translational Research
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Sep 26, 2020; 8(18): 3999-4009 Published online Sep 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i18.3999
Table 1 Distribution of the study subjects by age
Age (yr)
No. of subjects
Percentage (%)
16-18
16
41.02
19-22
14
35.89
23-40
7
17.94
> 40
2
5.15
Total
39
100.0
Table 2 Distribution of time taken to perform ART
Time taken for restoration (min)
No. of restorations in subjects
Percentage (%)
9-15
22
40.7
16-19
32
59.3
Total
54
100.0
Table 3 Distribution of subjects according to acceptance of atraumatic restorative treatment using visual analogue scale
VAS score
No. of restorations in subjects
Percentage (%)
1-3 (mild)
38
70.4
4 -7 (moderate)
16
29.6
8-10 (severe)
0
0.0
Total
54
100.0
Table 4 Distribution of restorations according to atraumatic restorative treatment evaluation criteria (Frencken J) at six months and twelve months follow-up
Code
6 mo, n = 54
12 mo, n = 49
No. of restorations
Percentage (%)
No. of restorations
Percentage (%)
0
39
72.2
27
55.5
1
8
14.8
8
16.3
2
4
7.4
4
6.1
3
0
0
1
2.0
4
0
0
1
2.0
5
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
7
2
3.7
5
10.2
8
0
0
2
4.0
9
0
0
0
0
10
1
1.8
1
2.2
Table 5 Life table analysis of atraumatic restorative treatment at six months and 12 months follow-up
Interval (mo)
Evaluated restoration
Success
Failure
Success rate (95%CI)
Cumulative survival rate (95%CI)
6 mo
54
49
4
94.4% (88.2%–99.9%)
94.4% (88.2%-99.9%)
12 mo
49
40
7
85.7% (75.9%-95.5%)
80.9% (69.9%-91.9%)
Table 6 Calculation of direct cost for atraumatic restorative treatment
Input cost
Financial cost
Economic cost
Annualized cost
Amount
Expected use full life of the capital
Discount rate
Primary consumables
Space
0
1000 INR (14.10 USD)
-
-
400 INR (5.64 USD) (12 d)
Equipment (ART kit)
0
4500 INR (63.47 USD)
5 yr
3.7
1216.21 INR (17.15 USD)
Secondary consumables
Staff
0
5400 INR (76.17 USD)
-
-
5400 INR (76.17 USD)
Consumables
2457
2457 INR (33.43 USD)
-
-
2457 INR (34.65 USD)
Travel expenses
600
600 INR (8.46 USD)
-
-
600 INR (8.46 USD)
Total
2947
11857 INR (167.25 USD)
10073.2 INR (142.08 USD)
Citation: Shivanna MM, Ganesh S, Khanagar SB, Naik S, Divakar DD, Al-Kheraif AA, Jhugroo C. Twelve-month evaluation of the atraumatic restorative treatment approach for class III restorations: An interventional study. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(18): 3999-4009