Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 6, 2020; 8(17): 3751-3762
Published online Sep 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i17.3751
Table 1 Clinicopathological characteristics of patients with liver metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, n (%)
Number
Age (range, yr)51 (18-69)
Gender
Male41 (53.9)
Female35 (46.1)
T stage
T15 (6.5)
T224 (31.2)
T325 (32.9)
T411 (14.4)
N stage
N036 (47.4)
N140 (52.6)
M stage at diagnosis
M031 (40.8)
M145 (59.2)
Grade of primary tumor
G113 (17.1)
G263 (82.9)
Grade of liver metastasis tumor
G112 (19.4)
G250 (80.6)
Surgery
Resection of primary tumor51 (67.1)
Non-resection of primary tumor25 (32.9)
Local treatment of liver metastasis
Yes (resection, TACE, ablation)33 (43.4)
No local treatment43 (56.6)
Max diameter of liver metastasis
< 5 mm27 (35.5)
> 5 mm49 (64.5)
Mean tumor burden of liver metastasis (range)0.5% (0.03%-80%)
Table 2 Univariate analysis of risk factors for time to progression in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
95% Confidence interval
Univariate analysisHazard ratioLowerUpper
Largest axis of liver metastasis2.7181.3755.372
Tumor burden of liver metastasis2.2621.0644.81
Resection of primary tumor2.1121.0154.394
T stage1.8881.2082.952
Table 3 Multivariate analysis of risk factors for time to progression in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
95% Confidence interval
Multivariate analysis
B
Standard error
Wald
Significant
Exp(B)
Lower
Upper
Largest axis of liver metastasis0.8100.3954.2060.0402.2471.0374.872
Grade0.6140.3842.5590.1101.8480.8713.924
T stage0.7930.3624.8100.0282.2111.0884.492
Resection of primary tumor0.8880.3945.0760.0242.4311.1235.266
Age-0.2840.3640.6080.4360.7530.3691.536