Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 6, 2020; 8(1): 46-53
Published online Jan 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i1.46
Table 1 Comparing the two treatment groups for osteoarthritis
ItemCureEffectiveInvalidTotal effective rate, %
Eucommia-meloxicam group1250888.57
Meloxicam group7511282.85
X22.126
P value0.345
Table 2 Comparing the two treatment groups for osteonecrosis
ItemEffectiveInvalidTotal effective rate, %
Eucommia-meloxicam group67889.33
Meloxicam group552073.33
X26.323
P value0.012
Table 3 Comparison of the WOMAC score in the two groups of osteoarthritis patients
ItemTimePainStiffDysfunction
Eucommia-meloxicam groupBefore treatment13.32 ± 2.125.23 ± 1.1437.23 ± 3.21
After treatment6.23 ± 1.232.38 ± 1.0623.35 ± 2.31
t21.2665.54469.158
P0.0000.0000.000
Meloxicam groupBefore treatment14.42 ± 2.466.16±1.2736.32 ± 4.17
After treatment3.69 ± 0.371.85 ± 0.2618.37 ± 3.52
t30.90660.65545.852
P0.0000.0000.000
Comparison of the two groups before treatmentt9.1794.4184.876
P0.0000.0000.000
Comparison of the two groups after treatmentt21.5510.7411.508
P0.0000.4690.000
Table 4 Comparison of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index score in the two groups of osteonecrosis
ItemTimePainStiffDysfunction
Eucommia-meloxicam groupBefore treatment16.59 ± 2.136.84 ± 0.3636.63 ± 4.21
After treatment7.31 ± 3.141.69 ± 0.2317.42 ± 3.58
t27.14153.83052.858
P0.0000.0000.000
Meloxicam groupBefore treatment18.31 ± 3.257.82 ± 0.2635.86 ± 4.36
After treatment5.16 ± 1.592.42 ± 0.1920.16 ± 3.45
t25.42657.87629.644
P0.0000.0000.000
Comparison of the two groups before treatmentt8.64318.0940.751
P0.0000.0000.453
Comparison of the two groups after treatmentt11.00612.11412.379
P0.0000.0000.000
Table 5 Comparison of the two treatment groups for osteoarthritis
ItemBGPIL-17S100A12SIPCyscSCrHb
Eucommia and meloxicam groupBefore treatment2.12 ± 0.12152 ± 6.1343 ± 3.20.23 ± 0.050.83 ± 0.346 ± 4.2132 ± 8.9
After treatment1.88 ± 0.35136.44 ± 4.5836.37 ± 5.680.116 ± 0.051.12 ± 0.563 ± 3.6113 ± 12.1
t2.2286.44.0086.3343.89410.172.55
P0.0530.0000.0030.0000.0040.0000.031
Meloxicam groupBefore treatment0.87 ± 0.21125 ± 6.432 ± 6.30.11 ± 0.050.87 ± 0.4353 ± 4.9124 ± 3.6
After treatment0.64 ± 0.19104 ± 6.418 ± 3.40.057 ± 0.011.46 ± 0.4274 ± 5.7104.3 ± 6.8
t3.9157.8485.6095.3313.15515.37410.632
P0.0040.0000.0000.0000.0120.0000.000
Comparison of the two groups before treatmentt30.64412.7475.8276.3573.3997.232.215
P0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0080.0000.054
Comparing the two groups after treatmentt35.84514.5238.4093.1742.7744.972.456
P0.0000.0000.0000.0110.0220.0000.036
Table 6 Comparison of the two treatment groups for osteonecrosis
ItemBGPIL-17S100A12SIPCyscSCrHb
Eucommia and meloxicam groupBefore treatment1.95 ± 0.17142 ± 11.5665 ± 4.60.312 ± 0.062.45 ± 0.2135 ± 5.3145 ± 6.4
After treatment1.64 ± 0.15125.13 ± 13.8442.7 ± 4.80.124 ± 0.041.42 ± 0.1757 ± 3.5123 ± 4.6
t2.4191.4327.9249.1858.17512.5136.713
P0.0390.1860.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
Meloxicam groupBefore treatment0.85 ± 0.13123 ± 8.553 ± 4.70.132 ± 0.0042.13 ± 0.1168 ± 5.4132 ± 5.4
After treatment0.58 ± 0.2198.1 ± 12.916.38 ± 3.50.069 ± 0.0051.69 ± 0.1982 ± 3.5105 ± 4.7
t3.7233.51714.0935.5064.8565.23913.069
P0.0050.0070.0000.0000.0010.0010.000
Comparison of the two groups before treatmentt15.747.2923.178.954.84810.5485.745
P0.0000.0000.0110.0000.0010.0000.000
Comparison of the two groups after treatmentt11.95910.4099.8334.254.01312.4449.21
P0.0000.0000.0000.0020.0030.0000.000