Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 26, 2019; 7(20): 3208-3216
Published online Oct 26, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i20.3208
Table 1 The Wicart grading system for assessing therapeutic efficacy for cavovarus foot
GradeSymptomsHeel axis and Meary’s angle (M°)
Very goodNoneValgus, 0° ≤ M < 15° or neutral/mild varus, 0° ≤ M < 5°
GoodNoneValgus, 15° ≤ M < 20° or neutral, 5° ≤ M < 20° or varus, 5° ≤ M < 15° or -15° ≤ M < 0° (mild overcorrection)
FairNoneValgus/neutral, M > 20° or varus, M > 15° or M < -15° (overcorrection)
PoorPain/sprainsRecurrence or need for triple arthrodesis
Table 2 Assessment results before surgery and at last follow-up
TimeMeary’s angle (°)Hibbs’ angle (°)
Before surgery24.11 ± 2.948135.86 ± 5.345
Last follow-up6.36 ± 1.810160.21 ± 4.167
t27.15119.017
P value< 0.001< 0.001