Chen L, Liu LP, Wen N, Qiao X, Meng YG. Comparative analysis of robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7(20): 3185-3193 [PMID: 31667168 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i20.3185]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Yuan-Guang Meng, MD, PhD, Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28, Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100853, China. mengyg6512@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Medicine, Research & Experimental
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 4 Follow-up data in the robotic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy groups
RRH(n = 216)
LRH (n = 342)
P value
Average follow-up period (mo)
30.07 ± 15.67
29.48 ± 15.07
0.658
Median follow-up period (mo)
29.0 (1.0-58.0)
30.0 (3.0-58.0)
Recurrence
Total recurrence rate
15.7%
12.00%
0.206
Number of patients with recurrence
34
41
Median recurrence time (mo)
20.0 (7.0-49.0)
20.0 (3.0-48.0)
Survival
Progression-free survival rate
81.02%
85.67%
0.157
Progression-free survival time
28.91 ± 15.68
28.34 ± 15.13
0.669
Overall survival rate
92.13%
94.45%
0.292
Overall survival time
29.87 ± 15.92
29.41 ± 15.14
0.732
Citation: Chen L, Liu LP, Wen N, Qiao X, Meng YG. Comparative analysis of robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7(20): 3185-3193