Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Clin Cases. Mar 16, 2018; 6(3): 27-34
Published online Mar 16, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i3.27
Published online Mar 16, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i3.27
Table 1 Periapical lesions on teeth treated with polyethylene fibre posts (n = 31), Zirconia-rich glass fibre posts (n = 31), and direct resin composite restorations n (%)
Time (mo) | 6 | 12 | 24 | 36 | |||||
Materials | Polyethylene | Zirconia | Polyethylene | Zirconia | Polyethylene | Zirconia | Polyethylene | Zirconia | |
Periapical lesion | A | 31 (100) | 30 (96.8) | 27 (87.1) | 27 (87.1) | 22 (71.0) | 23 (74.2) | 22 (71.0) | 23 (74.2) |
B | 0 (0) | 1 (3.2) | 4 (12.9) | 3 (9.7) | 5 (16.1) | 5 (16.1) | 5 (16.1) | 5 (16.1) | |
C | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.2) | 4 (12.9) | 3 (9.7) | 4 (12.9) | 3 (9.7) | |
NS | NS | NS | NS |
Table 2 Marginal leakage on teeth treated with polyethylene fibre posts (n = 31) and zirconia-rich glass fibre posts (n = 31) and direct resin composite restorations n (%)
Time (mo) | 6 | 12 | 24 | 36 | |||||
Materials | Polyethylene | Zirconia | Polyethylene | Zirconia | Polyethylene | Zirconia | Polyethylene | Zirconia | |
Marginal leakage | A | 28 (90.3) | 29 (93.5) | 27 (87.1) | 27 (87.1) | 26 (83.9) | 25 (80.6) | 26 (83.9) | 23 (74.2) |
B | 3 (9.7) | 2 (6.5) | 4 (12.9) | 4 (12.9) | 5 (16.1) | 6 (19.4) | 5 (16.1) | 8 (25.8) | |
C | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
NS | NS | NS | NS |
Table 3 Surface staining on teeth treated with polyethylene fibre posts (n = 31) and zirconia-rich glass fibre posts (n = 31) and direct resin composite restorations n (%)
Time (mo) | 6 | 12 | 24 | 36 | |||||
Materials | Polyethylene | Zirconia | Polyethylene | Zirconia | Polyethylene | Zirconia | Polyethylene | Zirconia | |
Surface staining | A | 31 (100) | 31 (100) | 29 (93.5) | 28 (90.3) | 27 (87.1) | 27 (87.1) | 26 (83.9) | 26 (83.9) |
B | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (6.5) | 3 (9.7) | 4 (12.9) | 4 (12.9) | 5 (16.1) | 5 (16.1) | |
NS | NS | NS | NS |
Table 4 Loss of composite crown retention on teeth treated with polyethylene fibre posts (n = 31) and zirconia-rich glass fibre posts (n = 31) and direct resin composite restorations n (%)
Time (mo) | 6 | 12 | 24 | 36 | |||||
Materials | Polyethylene | Zirconia | Polyethylene | Zirconia | Polyethylene | Zirconia | Polyethylene | Zirconia | |
Loss of retention | A | 29 (93.5) | 30 (96.8) | 27 (87.1) | 28 (90.3) | 27 (87.1) | 27 (87.1) | 27 (87.1) | 27 (87.1) |
B | 2 (6.5) | 1 (3.2) | 4 (12.9) | 3 (9.7) | 4 (12.9) | 4 (12.9) | 4 (12.9) | 4 (12.9) | |
C | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
NS | NS | NS | NS |
Table 5 Colour stability on teeth treated with polyethylene fibre posts (n = 31) and zirconia-rich glass fibre posts (n = 31) and direct resin composite restorations n (%)
Time (mo) | 6 | 12 | 24 | 36 | |||||
Materials | Polyethylene | Zirconia | Polyethylene | Zirconia | Polyethylene | Zirconia | Polyethylene | Zirconia | |
Colour stability | A | 31 (100) | 31 (100) | 28 (90.3) | 29 (93.5) | 27 (87.1) | 28 (90.3) | 26 (83.9) | 27 (87.1) |
B | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3 (9.7) | 2 (6.5) | 4 (12.9) | 3 (9.7) | 5 (16.1) | 4 (12.9) | |
C | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
NS | NS | NS | NS |
- Citation: Ayna B, Ayna E, Çelenk S, Başaran EG, Yılmaz BD, Tacir İH, Tuncer MC. Comparison of the clinical efficacy of two different types of post systems which were restored with composite restorations. World J Clin Cases 2018; 6(3): 27-34
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v6/i3/27.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v6.i3.27