Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 6, 2018; 6(11): 441-446
Published online Oct 6, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i11.441
Table 1 Baseline data of patients
Observation group (n = 158)Control group (n = 569)χ2/t valueP value
Age (yr)54.31 ± 12.5451.65 ± 11.290.3360.752
Gender
Male692630.3240.569
Female89306
B-ultrasound
Diameter of CBD (mm)9.51 ± 2.149.85 ± 2.070.2430.851
Number of CBD
Single1073720.3020.583
Multiple51197
Complications
Diabetes mellitus321120.0250.874
Hypertensive disease361012.0490.152
Hyperlipidemia13410.1880.665
WBC count8.23 ± 1.828.68 ± 2.25-1.7020.092
Table 2 Comparisons of serum liver function indicators
Observation group (n = 158)Control group (n = 569)t valueP value
ALT127.51 ± 28.71125.34 ± 27.250.2350.867
AST130.29 ± 27.87132.37 ± 30.190.2290.871
TBiL101.06 ± 23.3895.49 ± 22.420.8240.206
DBiL60.62 ± 11.7355.31 ± 10.820.9260.179
GGT210.28 ± 43.75186.35 ± 41.081.0830.126
ALP237.84 ± 52.97218.47 ± 50.181.0240.145
Table 3 Comparisons of tumor markers
Observation group (n = 158)Control group (n = 569)t valueP value
CA19990.25 ± 21.1725.19 ± 7.0625.5970.000
CA12526.73 ± 6.9424.61 ± 6.450.5270.487
CA15310.07 ± 2.549.76 ± 2.240.3530.728
CEA2.67 ± 0.572.53 ± 0.150.3010.779
AFP3.18 ± 0.633.12 ± 0.610.2080.894
Table 4 Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of carbohydrate antigen 199
AreaStd. errorAsymptotic sig.Asymptotic 95%CICutoff valueSensitivitySpecificity
0.8850.0220.0000.841-0.92952.50.8680.816