Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 16, 2014; 2(10): 534-540
Published online Oct 16, 2014. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i10.534
Published online Oct 16, 2014. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i10.534
Table 1 Evaluation of clinical parameters from pre-operative to 6 mo post-operative period for group I-gingival massaging using a placebo (Clarified butter) (n = 30)
Clinical parameters | Baseline (mean ± SD) | 6 mo (mean ± SD) | P-value (significance) |
Recession height | 1.7 ± 0.65 | 1.5 ± 0.51 | 0.034 |
Recession width | 3.8 ± 0.66 | 3.57 ± 0.63 | 0.100 |
Probing pocket depth | 1.9 ± 0.40 | 1.5 ± 0.51 | 0.001b (S) |
Clinical attachment level | 3.5 ± 0.82 | 3 ± 0.87 | 0.002b (S) |
Thickness of keratinized tissue | 0.84 ± 0.18 | 0.97 ± 0.21 | < 0.001b (S) |
Width of attached gingiva | 2.53 ± 0.57 | 2.8 ± 0.55 | 0.011 |
Table 2 Evaluation of clinical parameters from pre-operative to 6 mo post-operative period for group-II gingival massaging using an ayurvedic oil (iremedadi taila) (n = 30)
Clinical parameters | Baseline (mean ± SD) | 6 mo (mean ± SD) | P-value (significance) |
Recession height | 1.77 ± 0.63 | 1.27 ± 0.58 | 0.003b (S) |
Recession width | 3.3 ± 0.46 | 2.23 ± 0.43 | < 0.001b (S) |
Probing pocket depth | 1.47 ± 0.50 | 1.63 ± 0.49 | 0.096 (NS) |
Clinical attachment level | 3.23 ± 0.82 | 2.9 ± 0.76 | 0.064 (NS) |
Thickness of keratinized tissue | 0.85 ± 0.17 | 1.07 ± 0.19 | < 0.001b (S) |
Width of attached gingiva | 2.37 ± 0.56 | 2.9 ± 0.66 | 0.001b (S) |
Table 3 Evaluation of clinical parameters from pre-operative to 6 mo post-operative period for Group-III semilunar coronally repositioned flap (n = 30)
Clinical parameters | Baseline | 6 mo | P-value |
(mean ± SD) | (mean ± SD) | (significance) | |
Recession height | 2.33 ± 0.55 | 0.57 ± 0.50 | < 0.001b (S) |
Recession width | 3.33 ± 0.76 | 1.1 ± 0.66 | < 0.001b (S) |
Probing pocket depth | 1.57 ± 0.50 | 1.33 ± 0.48 | 0.071 |
Clinical attachment level | 3.87 ± 0.73 | 1.9 ± 0.66 | < 0.001b (S) |
Thickness of keratinized tissue | 0.97 ± 0.19 | 1.38 ± 0.23 | < 0.001b (S) |
Width of attached gingiva | 2.63 ± 0.71 | 3.37 ± 0.56 | 0.001 (S) |
Table 4 Comparison of clinical parameters from pre-operative to 6 mo post-operative period between the three groups using Kruskal Wallis test1
Clinical parameter | Group I | Group II | Group III | χ2 | P-value (significance) |
Recession height | 0.2 ± 0.48 | 0.5 ± 0.78 | 1.77 ± 0.73 | 47.56 | < 0.001b (S) |
Recession width | 0.23 ± 0.77 | 1.07 ± 0.58 | 2.23 ± 0.82 | 51.28 | < 0.001b (S) |
Probing pocket depth | 0.4 ± 0.49 | -0.17 ± 0.53 | 0.23 ± 0.68 | 13.29 | < 0.001b (S) |
Clinical attachment level | 0.5 ± 0.73 | 0.33 ± 0.96 | 1.97 ± 0.81 | 42.01 | < 0.001b (S) |
Thickness of keratinized tissue | -0.13 ± 0.12 | -0.23 ± 0.15 | -0.41 ± 0.27 | 22.86 | < 0.001b (S) |
Width of attached gingiva | -0.27 ± 0.52 | - 0.53 ± 0.68 | -0.73 ± 0.98 | 7.03 | 0.03 (NS) |
Table 5 Comparison of clinical parameters between group 3 vs group 2 using Mann-Whitney U test
Table 6 Comparison of clinical parameters between group 3 vs group 1 using Mann-Whitney U test
Table 7 Comparison of clinical parameters between group 2 vs group 1 using Mann-Whitney U test
- Citation: Mishra AK, Kumathalli K, Sridhar R, Maru R, Mangal B, Kedia S, Shrihatti R. Comparison of semilunar coronally repositioned flap with gingival massaging using an Ayurvedic product (irimedadi taila) in the treatment of class-I gingival recession: A clinical study. World J Clin Cases 2014; 2(10): 534-540
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v2/i10/534.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v2.i10.534